Jump to content

Kamala Harris Shifts Position on Border Wall, Signaling Tougher Stance on Immigration


Social Media

Recommended Posts

image.png

 

Kamala Harris, once a vocal critic of the border wall during Donald Trump’s presidency, now pledges to allocate hundreds of millions of dollars to extend the barrier along the southern border if elected president. This shift comes as Harris embraces a more aggressive immigration policy, a significant departure from her previous liberal positions on issues such as Medicare for All and fracking, which her campaign now opposes.

 

Harris’ campaign appears to be adapting to the pressure of Trump’s repeated attacks on her stance on border security. While Harris now supports measures for the wall, she maintains key differences with Trump, particularly opposing family separation policies and mass deportation plans. In her recent speech at the Democratic National Convention, Harris voiced her intention to sign the bipartisan border security bill, a piece of legislation that Trump had previously blocked due to concerns it would politically benefit Democrats in the upcoming election.

 

The bill, negotiated by Senators James Lankford (R-Okla.) and Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), mandates that hundreds of millions of unspent funds be used to continue the construction of the border wall. Lankford remarked that the bill carries forward the standards set during the Trump administration regarding the structure’s height and location. "It requires the Trump border wall," Lankford told Axios, clarifying that the bill specifies where and how the wall must be built. The legislation’s estimated cost for continuing the wall stands at $650 million, a significant reduction from the $18 billion that Trump originally requested in 2018.

 

However, Harris’ camp argues that this legislation is not a full endorsement of Trump's wall and highlights that it involves much more than just wall funding. Her advisers pointed out that the bill does not allocate new money for the wall but merely extends the timeline for using funds appropriated during Trump's presidency, albeit with new restrictions to ensure these funds are used strictly for barriers. Additionally, the bill includes provisions to address the overloaded immigration system, such as increasing funding for asylum lawyers and judges, and grants the president the authority to close the border if more than 5,000 migrants cross in a single day.

 

This is a sharp contrast from Harris’ earlier stance. When she first ran for president in 2019, she condemned Trump’s wall as a "medieval vanity project" and consistently opposed any funding for its construction. In a 2020 Facebook post, Harris declared, "Trump's border wall is a complete waste of taxpayer money and won't make us any safer." Earlier, in 2017, shortly after joining the Senate, she called the wall a "stupid use of money" and vowed to block any efforts to fund it.

 

Harris' recent support of the bipartisan border security bill has raised eyebrows, even among some of her political colleagues. Senator Lankford expressed surprise at Harris' full embrace of the bill, noting that she had not participated in the negotiations. "We never saw any vice president staff here," Lankford remarked. "I know she's talking about it now, but she wasn't talking about it at all before." Meanwhile, Senator Murphy described the bill as "aggressive," noting that it introduces new tools to manage the border but also emphasized that it does not stray from the nation's core values.

 

Although President Biden had criticized Trump for killing the compromise bill, some Democrats, including Senator Alex Padilla of California, took issue with the conservative nature of the policies within it. Padilla opposed the bill, stating that it "fails to provide relief for a single Dreamer, a single farmworker, a single essential worker or long-term resident."

 

Harris has positioned herself as a hardliner on immigration in her campaign ads, showcasing her time as California's attorney general and highlighting her support for increasing the number of Border Patrol agents. These moves come as Trump’s campaign continues to attack her on the administration’s struggles to handle surges of migrants at the southern border.

 

Harris' evolving stance on immigration reflects how the political conversation around border security has shifted in recent years, largely influenced by Trump’s presidency. Her willingness to support aspects of the border wall is a marked departure from her earlier rhetoric, illustrating the pressures and complexities of immigration policy in contemporary American politics.

 

Based on a report from: AXIOS 2024-09-28

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

news-footer-4.png

 

image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites


18 minutes ago, wombat said:

Too bad she didnt do it the last four years

She did what VICE presidents are supposed to do.  Please list all of Mike Pence's accomplishments. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Tug said:

Lie#1 there was never a border czar that’s a magga lie #2 it is leagle to request asylum as the law is written the bipartisan border bill provides for 1500 direct border patrol agents + judges and case workers to clear the backlog of asylum seekers.i am dumbfounded that anyone cannot see what trump is up to and what an abysmal president he was….thaipo presidential scholars folks that study thease things have adjudged trump as the worst president in our history that’s a sad fact.trump killed the bill because he needs something to campaign on no more no less.

You are increasingly unencumbered by reality. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And of course it doesn't matter that she wants to keep them out, she can say that because she is on the left. I guess Obama was also, but some of his policies were also a bit right, and yes he also wanted to build walls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Cryingdick said:

You are increasingly unencumbered by reality. 

 

That's why Harris uses that chestnut so often.  There is no chance anyone would vote for her if they looked at what has happened in her past.  In California and in the White House.  There's a trail of wreckage she wants to be unburdened from.

 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

That's why Harris uses that chestnut so often.  There is no chance anyone would vote for her if they looked at what has happened in her past.  In California and in the White House.  There's a trail of wreckage she wants to be unburdened from.

 

She shows up for a photo op by a wall she would demolish and her fish belly white VP would set up a ladder factory next to. I would love to see any member of this forum climb a border wall in that heat with a ladder and propel down the other side. Anybody that doesn't understand that is a barrier to entry is a moron. Can you imagine Tug or JT going up the ladder while the cartel pushes them over to freedom?

Edited by Cryingdick
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Social Media said:

Kamala Harris, once a vocal critic of the border wall during Donald Trump’s presidency, now pledges to allocate hundreds of millions of dollars to extend the barrier along the southern border if elected president. This shift comes as Harris embraces a more aggressive immigration policy, a significant departure from her previous liberal positions on issues such as Medicare for All and fracking, which her campaign now oppose

I love how the news makes this into such a good thing for Harris. When really it just shows how un-opinionated she is and that she has no real stance on any topic. If she changes her mind just to appease a certain subject, who is to say she will not change it again once elected. This is one scary type of person to have in the White House. God Help America

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

She said nothing about the women and girls raped and murdered. "Donal Trump ripped babies from the arms of mothjers". At least he knew where they were.

 

Where are the 250,000 missing children. In brothels in Queens?

 

She is a disgrace to humanity as are all the leftists that seek to destoy our country.

 

Note to Joe Biden and Gia Raimondo. You want to squash me like a bug? You want to eradicate me.? Come and get some as they say, I'll be waiting

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now








×
×
  • Create New...
""