V P Debate
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
43
Apparent discrepancy between metering systems
Thank you again for your hint , which I had completely ignored, although I was aware of the Seal's meager 7kW limitation. I can now add a little anecdote to this: when I informed my PV installer that I would be postponing the planned charger upgrade indefinitely due to the castrated EYD onboard charger, he again came up with the claim that the BYD Seal could supposedly charge 22 KW AC. This time he referred to the statements of the staff at our local BYD showroom. Which unfortunately confirms my already extremely negative impression of these staff, because they are usually constantly conspicuous for their lack of information and extremely nonsensical claims. I have the impression that my PV installer is more inclined to trust the statements of these people. There is no reference to this point on BYD's Thai websites, only the 150 KW DC charging power is advertised. The 2023 catalog also provides no reference to this. really reputable sources for the Thai model 2023. As far as the onboard charger is concerned, I haven't been able to find any so far. In contrast to the Australian model, for example, which was also sold with this 7 KW limitation. -
21
Health Canada Confirms Undisclosed Presence of DNA Sequence in Pfizer Covid-19 Shot
Note that the topic as covered in the posted Epoch Times article has been addressed in this longer but very worthwhile piece by dr Byram W. Brydle on his substack providing some background on the significance and implications of that SV40 sequence. > https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/p/explosive-story-health-canada-admits In that article Brydle also addresses the potential juridicial consequences of Pfizer not having disclosed the the presence of this SV40 DNA sequence to the HealthCanada regulator. An excerpt: > Notably, Pfizer has been granted legal indemnity for their shots; something which in and of itself should be a major concern. However, an important court ruling was recently made in Michigan, USA. Specifically, the court ruled that a pharmaceutical company’s legal indemnity was null and void for a contaminated version of the medical product. The product, but not any contaminants are subject to the legal indemnity. And failing to disclose a bioactive component would seem to go one step further. You can read an article about the legal issue here [ https://wwmt.com/news/local/michigan-judge-denies-drug-manufacturers-immunity-in-case-of-contaminated-covid-19-medication ] So, it would follow that Pfizer’s legal indemnity should be null and void for shots that contaminated with bacterial DNA that included a bioactive sequence that was not disclosed to regulatory agencies. = = = -
9,243
Electric Vehicles in Thailand
Are we getting the Atto 2 in Thailand? I think it will do well. -
97
-
36
American man and Thai wife lose 15.2 million baht in Hua Hin property fraud
Hopefully he remitted all 15.2 m before 1/1/24. -
8
Trump holds back billions in funding despite court ruling, states tell judge
I will offer an alternative silly political picture: Incidentally, both apparently suffered from extreme flatulence caused by diet!
-
-
Popular in The Pub
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now