Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Yagoda said:

The world is going to hell and all she cares about is killing babies. That's all she has. No economic plan, no plan to solve the border, no plan to solve any problems in the Middle East no plan to ensure energy Independence no plan to fix the military no plan no plan no plan but let's kill babies! Rip them fetuses out of the womb celebrate your abortions! Oh wait no it's not an abortion it's not infanticide it's Reproductive Rights. The last politicians to rename murder were the national socialists with their final solution

You seem detached from reality.

 

https://x.com/Acyn/status/1850233018935554405

 

Are you worried about the cows?

Edited by Danderman123
  • Like 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
2 hours ago, WDSmart said:

I certainly hope these polls do not predict the real outcomes. I can't imagine how horrible it would be to have Trump become president again. I just can't understand how so many of my fellow US citizens could consider backing a man like that. Even if Trump loses, it will probably be that 45% or more of registered voters voted for him. Despicable! 

Folks who dont vote for Trump support genital mutilation of children, segregation, racial preferences, anti americanism and anti semitism.

 

Looks like the despicability is on your side

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, morrobay said:

Nonsense , authoritarian does not equate to left or right. You people are not doing the folks on the right any favors with your ignorance 

Im ready to debate any time. Here is a proposition for you to chew on: You cant have Socialism without authoritarianism. Deal with it.

  • Haha 2
Posted
54 minutes ago, still kicking said:

And people vote for him?

:cheesy:

People dont like babykilling and genital mutilation so, yes.

  • Sad 2
  • Haha 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Im ready to debate any time. Here is a proposition for you to chew on: You cant have Socialism without authoritarianism. Deal with it.

No, you can have a socialist economy with several different kinds of government. Authoritarianism would be possible but the least likely. The most likely would be a democracy. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

I'm a far-left liberal, and I didn't vote for Trump. I am not, however, in support of genital mutilation of children (circumcision?), segregation, racial preferences, and anti-Semitism. I am in favor of anti-Americanism if that means being against most of the features that Trump and his supporters consider "American values," like Christian nationalism, capitalism, anti-immigrant, and White supremacy. 

Oh a far left anti capitalist? Cool. At least you admit your adherence to the most murderous ideology of all time. Power in the hands of folks likes you leads to ditches full of bodies.

  • Sad 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

No, you can have a socialist economy with several different kinds of government. Authoritarianism would be possible but the least likely. The most likely would be a democracy. 

The least likely.

China

Venezuela

Cambodia

Russia

National Socialist Germany

 

Great track record

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Oh a far left anti capitalist? Cool. At least you admit your adherence to the most murderous ideology of all time. Power in the hands of folks likes you leads to ditches full of bodies.

Yes, I am a far-left anti-capitalist. I prefer a socialist economy. I don't want power in my hands. I want to live in a democracy. If there are ditches full of bodies, they were probably put there by right-wing fascists. 

Edited by WDSmart
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, WDSmart said:

Yes, I am a far-left anti-capitalist. I prefer a socialist economy. I don't want power in my hands. I want to live in a democracy. If there are ditches full of bodies, they were probably put there by right-wing fascists. 

You may not want power but your leaders do. And when they hand you a rifle and push you towards the line of class enemies waiting for their bullets, what are you going to do?. Odds are, based on research, that you will shoot because you are either brainwashed or?

 

Right wingers and conservatives dont have a history of murder.

  • Haha 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, Yagoda said:
11 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

No, you can have a socialist economy with several different kinds of government. Authoritarianism would be possible but the least likely. The most likely would be a democracy. 

The least likely.

China

Venezuela

Cambodia

Russia

National Socialist Germany

 

Great track record

No, none of these have a socialist or communist economy. They all practice capitalism. Some, like the USA, do have a mix of capitalism and socialism, but none has true socialism. But yes, all on the list do have, IMO, an authoritarian government. We in the USA have what I would call a plutocracy disguised as a democratic republic. 

  • Like 2
Posted
19 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

You may not want power but your leaders do. And when they hand you a rifle and push you towards the line of class enemies waiting for their bullets, what are you going to do?. Odds are, based on research, that you will shoot because you are either brainwashed or?

 

Right wingers and conservatives dont have a history of murder.

What are you talking about?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
49 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

No, I will live here in Thailand in the mountains and let my fellow citizens in the USA sort things out by themselves.

Right-wingers do have a long history of murder, from Ghengis Khan to Hitler and now Putin and Netanyahu. 

Ghengis Khan was a right winger? Where did you learn that one lol.

 

Hitler was a Socialist, Putin is barely a player in the realm of murder and Netanyahu? You must be an anti semite, socialists usually are.

  • Haha 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

But who is advocating socialism beyond the economic idea of maybe tax the very rich a bit more - something that won't affect most voters including I assume yourself - and providing a few more services to the rest. Maybe the odd social policy that are mostly non controversial. So how does that require authoritarianism. If your talking about a more formal definition of socialism than it's irrelevant as neither party is advocating for it. 

The Democrats are allied with the Democrats Socialists, supported by the Communist party and several members of their leadership are avowed socialists.

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...