Joe Rogan releases podcast with Trump, draws 300K views in 30 minutes

[transam]

Just now, dinsdale said:

It seems you have no idea about burden of proof. I do not have to prove a negative. Here's an example that you may or may not understand. I do not have to prove God doesn't exist. The proof of burden of God's existence is on those who say God exists. Same goes with Kamala's claim she worked at McDonalds. No one has to prove she didn't. She has to prove she did. It's a very simple concept.

Why, to satisfy numpties like you over nothing..............🤭

 

Go ask Trumps mate Musk if he was working illegally in the USA on a student visa......😂

[dinsdale]

5 minutes ago, transam said:

So guilty until proven innocent in your book, yep, Trump material.....😒

Guilty of lying until she proves otherwise? Yes. If she can prove she worked at McDonald's then ok she worked at McDonalds. If she can't prove this then any reasonable and rational person will assume she's lying. There is NO EVIDENCE of her being employed by McDonalds. How much clearer can it be.

[BangkokReady]

13 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

One guy droning on about old grievances and the other guy laughing at him.

 

It's actually very interesting and mostly positive.  The only negative comes from discussing some of the unpleasant things that the left has done, which was pretty much matter of fact.

[dinsdale]

Just now, transam said:

Why, to satisfy numpties like you over nothing..............🤭

 

Go ask Trumps mate Musk if he was working illegally in the USA on a student visa......😂

Ah! Here we go. Your usual personal attacks when you know you are wrong along with a nice bit of deflection. So very predictable.

[Chomper Higgot]

3 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

It seems you have no idea about burden of proof. I do not have to prove a negative. Here's an example that you may or may not understand. I do not have to prove God doesn't exist. The proof of burden of God's existence is on those who say God exists. Same goes with Kamala's claim she worked at McDonalds. No one has to prove she didn't. She has to prove she did. It's a very simple concept.

No she doesn’t have to.

 

She can spend her time on more important matters.

 

The problem arises when a candidate repeats claims that have been proven false on multiple occasions and when his supporters, both foreign and domestic choose to believe and parrot his bare faced lies.

 

 

[Chomper Higgot]

1 minute ago, BangkokReady said:

 

It's actually very interesting and mostly positive.  The only negative comes from discussing some of the unpleasant things that the left has done, which was pretty much matter of fact.

Unpleasant things?

 

 

 

[transam]

Just now, dinsdale said:

Guilty of lying until she proves otherwise? Yes. If she can prove she worked at McDonald's then ok she worked at McDonalds. If she can't prove this then any reasonable and rational person will assume she's lying. There is NO EVIDENCE of her being employed by McDonalds. How much clearer can it be.

😂.............Why not concentrate on your heroes daily lies, why don't YOU ever mention those, hypocrite or what.........?          😂

 

But, tell me why the McD's thing has been dropped by those that matter, it's only you that has your head stuck in a plate of fries........? 🤪

[BangkokReady]

7 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Is Hillary still enjoying rent free accommodation after all these years?

 

Lol.  Is that the best you can come up with?  It's true what they say, "the left can't meme".  

 

It's actually kind of sad the way you (very often) go straight to trolling when you don't have any come back.  (It is great for showing your lack of credibility, though.)

[transam]

4 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

It's actually very interesting and mostly positive.  The only negative comes from discussing some of the unpleasant things that the left has done, which was pretty much matter of fact.

Unpleasant things.........?   

[BangkokReady]

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Unpleasant things?

 

Yeah.  Just re-read some of your past comments.  You'll see the evidence there.

[Chomper Higgot]

1 minute ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Lol.  Is that the best you can come up with?  It's true what they say, "the left can't meme".  

 

It's actually kind of sad the way you (very often) go straight to trolling when you don't have any come back.  (It is great for showing your lack of credibility, though.)

Sorry but really ‘Hillary’.

 

You’re living in the past.

[Hamus Yaigh]

2 hours ago, Henryford said:

I also saw the Musk interview with Tucker. I was shocked when he said that California had just passed a law which allowed people to vote without showing ANY ID. Incredible that the USA, the land of the brave and the free, would promote such a law which can ONLY be there to allow voter fraud.

And you believed the pair? Surely you know some voters are allowed to vote without ID to avoid disenfranchisement? Everyone must registered beforehand or they cannot vote. It happens in many countries like this. Some people don't have or carry ID.

[transam]

1 minute ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Lol.  Is that the best you can come up with?  It's true what they say, "the left can't meme".  

 

It's actually kind of sad the way you (very often) go straight to trolling when you don't have any come back.  (It is great for showing your lack of credibility, though.)

Aaah, how droll, the trolling card..............

The sign of a cornered individual.......🤐

[Chomper Higgot]

1 minute ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Yeah.  Just re-read some of your past comments.  You'll see the evidence there.

Let me guess, attempting to overthrow an election, inciting race hatred, stripping women of their rights, sucking up to tyrants, defending Putin and his illegal war?

 

 

[BangkokReady]

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Sorry but really ‘Hillary’.

 

You’re living in the past.

 

Weak bait.  Try harder.

[BangkokReady]

2 minutes ago, transam said:

Aaah, how droll, the trolling card..............

The sign of a cornered individual.......🤐

 

How so?

[BangkokReady]

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Let me guess, attempting to overthrow an election, inciting race hatred, stripping women of their rights, sucking up to tyrants, defending Putin and his illegal war?

 

No idea what you're talking about.  Perhaps you're replying to the wrong person?

[dinsdale]

3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

No she doesn’t have to.

 

She can spend her time on more important matters.

 

The problem arises when a candidate repeats claims that have been proven false on multiple occasions and when his supporters, both foreign and domestic choose to believe and parrot his bare faced lies.

 

 

She is running for the Office of The President of the United States. She said she worked at McDonald's but this by all accounts is false. If she worked there why hasn't she just come out and said so with supporting evidence to silence the critics? As for more important matters do you mean attacking Trump because she can't articulate policy or even answer simple questions or getting as many woke celebrities to endorse her as she can (didn't work for Clinton) or maybe undoing her complete mess of the borders and illegal immigration? 

[transam]

2 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

How so?

Calling troll is really only applicable to an actual troll, not by someone that is obviously cornered by replies...........

[BangkokReady]

3 minutes ago, transam said:

Calling troll is really only applicable to an actual troll, not by someone that is obviously cornered by replies...........

 

You're being ridiculous.  Read the comments.

Edited October 27 by BangkokReady

[transam]

1 minute ago, dinsdale said:

She is running for the Office of The President of the United States. She said she worked at McDonald's but this by all accounts is false. If she worked there why hasn't she just come out and said so with supporting evidence to silence the critics? As for more important matters do you mean attacking Trump because she can't articulate policy or even answer simple questions or getting as many woke celebrities to endorse her as she can (didn't work for Clinton) or maybe undoing her complete mess of the borders and illegal immigration? 

It is false only by you, show us the PROOF she didn't do the fries, go for it, because she's not bothered, and most of the planet isn't............😆

[dinsdale]

10 minutes ago, transam said:

😂.............Why not concentrate on your heroes daily lies, why don't YOU ever mention those, hypocrite or what.........?          😂

 

But, tell me why the McD's thing has been dropped by those that matter, it's only you that has your head stuck in a plate of fries........? 🤪

No need to carry on with the Harris lie about working at McDonalds. That was put to rest with Trumps magnificent political stunt. Everyone (except the stupid) knows there is nothing to support her claim.

[transam]

Just now, BangkokReady said:

 

You're being ridiculous.  Red the comments.

Red, not me..........😱

[transam]

Just now, dinsdale said:

No need to carry on with the Harris lie about working at McDonalds. That was put to rest with Trumps magnificent political stunt. Everyone (except the stupid) knows there is nothing to support her claim.

You should be careful using the word.."Stupid"....😋

[frank83628]

19 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

It’s not usual at all.

 

Lots of old folk behave this way, sit them down in a cumfy chair, give them a cup of tea and a biscuit and they ramble on for hours.

 

 

Yeah of course they do. That is the lamest reply posted on An to date

[dinsdale]

Just now, transam said:

It is false only by you, show us the PROOF she didn't do the fries, go for it, because she's not bothered, and most of the planet isn't............😆

Again I bring you back to burden of proof and not having to prove a negative. You obviously do not understand this concept so no point flogging a dead horse.

[BangkokReady]

1 minute ago, transam said:

Red, not me..........😱

 

🙄

 

Keep trolling.  Up to you.  🤷‍♂️

[transam]

1 minute ago, dinsdale said:

Again I bring you back to burden of proof and not having to prove a negative. You obviously do not understand this concept so no point flogging a dead horse.

Am glad you're giving up on the fries' thing.......

[KhunLA]

Fairly obvious from the replies, I sense most anti Joe & Donald folks didn't even listen to the podcast ...

 

troll on ... nuff said

[transam]

1 minute ago, BangkokReady said:

 

🙄

 

Keep trolling.  Up to you.  🤷‍♂️

See, you did it again, and calling "Red comments", which is untrue........😒