Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
35 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

No details have been released regarding his motivation.

 

The police have cautioned against speculating on the matter.

 

Not only do I condemn the piece filth that committed these heinous crimes, I want to see him tried, found guilty and rot in prison for the rest of his putrid life.

 

But I also understand that the best way to ensure his trial is beyond any successful appeal is to follow the advice the police are giving and not engage in speculation and spreading online rumors.

 

 

 

 

Well in my opinion he killed 3 kids, he was caught red handed, that is sufficient to put him away for life without parole. A bit of speculation online or a few rumours does not change anything about  that. 

As to his terrorist motivation, worrying as it is , it won't put him inside  for any longer,  just bang him up for murder with a whole life sentence. I'm sure two tier kier could organise that if hr wants to,  

Anybody who attempts to support him can join him as far as I am concerned.

By the way its nice to see you condemn him, sometimes you really worry me

  • Like 2
Posted
51 minutes ago, James105 said:

 

So the fact that Starmer lied to the public and in doing so incited more civil unrest,  the fact the government and police covered up the true nature of this crime and accused others of misinformation when they were saying facts, the fact that ricin was found in his home and it appears nothing was done to address the safety of the neighbourhood, the fact that people are in jail right now for crimes that would not have been crimes had the truth been revealed immediately.   All of that and your hot take is to accuse Jenrick of playing politics instead of lambasting Starmer for his lies?   

 

If your comment was parody (which I actually assume it must be) then I take the above back and would say your comment was amusing.   

Of course my comment wasn't parody.  There is no evidence whatsoever of anything in your post.  Time for you to jump off the conspiracy train and wait for the facts.

Posted
23 minutes ago, proton said:

Simon nails it as usual

 

 

He certainly did nail it and i could not help noticing  his closing statement.   Timed to deflect from the budget, without doubt

What a nasty government we now have

  • Agree 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

Well in my opinion he killed 3 kids, he was caught red handed, that is sufficient to put him away for life without parole. A bit of speculation online or a few rumours does not change anything about  that. 

As to his terrorist motivation, worrying as it is , it won't put him inside  for any longer,  just bang him up for murder with a whole life sentence. I'm sure two tier kier could organise that if hr wants to,  

Anybody who attempts to support him can join him as far as I am concerned.

By the way its nice to see you condemn him, sometimes you really worry me

What worries you is the assumptions you yourself make.

 

The fact remains rumour mongering  can and does put trials at risk, the best  ay to avoid that is to not engage in online speculation.

 

 

  • Haha 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

He certainly did nail it and i could not help noticing  his closing statement.   Timed to deflect from the budget, without doubt

What a nasty government we now have

Truly awful people. I can't understand why Chomper thinks so highly of "Sir" Keier Starmer - especially as the appointment to head of CPS carries an automatic Knighthood and is made by the Attorney General who is a political appointment (made by the Monarch as recommended by the PM). Now, who was PM at the time and did his wife ever work for Matrix chamber as a ""yuuman rights" lawyer.

  • Thanks 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, mokwit said:

Truly awful people. I can't understand why Chomper thinks so highly of "Sir" Keier Starmer - especially as the appointment to head of CPS carries an automatic Knighthood and is made by the Attorney General who is a political appointment (made by the Monarch as recommended by the PM). Now, who was PM at the time and did his wife ever work for Matrix chamber as a ""yuuman rights" lawyer.

Perhaps because I don’t swallow the constant stream of rightwing grievance stroking.

 

I’m looking forward to the budget… and the response from the rightwing.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

What worries you is the assumptions you yourself make.

 

The fact remains rumour mongering  can and does put trials at risk, the best  ay to avoid that is to not engage in online speculation.

 

 

Not engaging in online speculation hopefully will also put you at less risk of Merseyside police videoing themselves dragging you out of your home and put in a cage.

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

Perhaps because I don’t swallow the constant stream of rightwing grievance stroking.

 

I’m looking forward to the budget… and the response from the rightwing.

The Government is so out of touch I wouldn't rule out riots from the working class as a possible response.

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, mokwit said:

Not engaging in online speculation hopefully will also put you at less risk of Merseyside police videoing themselves dragging you out of your home and put in a cage.

That’s a vivid imagination you have.

Posted
4 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

We need Farage more than ever now 

 


Why on earth do we need a pathetic, self centred, hypocritical grifter who doesn't care an ounce for his constituents or his country, only his own bank balance?

 

453196033_1551208638833311_268179322843939874_n.jpg

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

That’s a vivid imagination you have.

The footage is online. Seems all some people did was tweet.

 

Interestingly someone who pleaded not guilty was found not guilty.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Or maybe you’re out of touch.

Bus fares capped at GBP3 not GBP2 will affect the lowest earners etc etc

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, James105 said:

That impact being none of course. 

Probably because it will go to recently set up environmental consultancies etc.

  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

 

Douglas Murray

Now we know why the UK authorities kept so quiet after the slaughter of three young girls in Southport. They kept silent because the suspect had al-Qaeda manuals. They knew. They just didn’t want the public to know. Because they think the public can’t be trusted.

 

There is still information that we do not know.............

 

We deserve to know the full truth about the Southport massacre

As this is a live case, there are many things which, unfortunately, I am not allowed to write. It is deeply frustrating. What I can say is that there is good reason to suspect the official delay in disclosing relevant information stoked an already febrile atmosphere in which public speculation and anger about this heinous crime grew, eventually leading to widespread rioting.

 

Douglas Murray making assertions without providing any evidence to back them up.

 

He’s had enough of an education to know the deliberate leap he’s making.

  • Confused 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Douglas Murray making assertions without providing any evidence to back them up.

 

He’s had enough of an education to know the deliberate leap he’s making.

 

image.png.c45a81684b44e3b9b2dcbb75f4417c0f.png

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Seems Chomper was stating as fact that neither Islam or muslims had any part without proof. He needs to hold himself to the same standards he demands from others.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Labour don't care about low earners.

 

Or pensioners. 

 

They are the party of middle class Liberals. They despise the working class. Often openly mock them. 

You made a prediction for the budget some weeks back, I wonder how that will pan out?

Posted
10 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Douglas Murray making assertions without providing any evidence to back them up.

 

He’s had enough of an education to know the deliberate leap he’s making.

How do you know he does not know about the evidence? Did you read the other link about not being able to reveal all because its a live case?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

How do you know he does not know about the evidence? Did you read the other link about not being able to reveal all because its a live case?

If he knows then he needs to include it in his statements, he has not.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...