Dear Folks,

 

We all know that the dating site TINDER is mostly about...The FACE.

 

How superficial is THAT?

 

And, also, how very DUMB.

 

What we really need is a site which I plan to launch, quite soon....

 

My dating site, already in the mock-up phase, with preliminary coding almost completed,  will be called SINder.

 

On my site, users will NOT see Faces.

 

Instead, users will upload pics showing ONLY their goods....

 

From the Navel to the Knees.

 

After all, even on Tinder, this is basically what most people want to see, even if they only show these parts following a few weeks of texting....

 

I know that my new site will be a hit.

 

Will you join my new SINder dating app?

 

I know you will love it.

 

What do you think?

Will my knew site be a sinful hit with the younger crowd, and even more so with the older generation?

 

Surprised nobody has, to date, launched a site like mine, for dates.

 

And, I just wanted to let you know, now, to drum up a bit of support, PRE-LAUNCH.....

 

Best regards,

Gamma

 

NOTE4:  By the way, if anyone here might think that they can copy my great idea....please do not bother.

 

I have already patented and registered the name SINder with the proper authorities. 

 

Always best to streamline the dating process, in my view.

 

And, everyone, secretly, wants to know, in advance, what they will be getting.

 

I  plan to make a TON of money on this site.

 

 

I wonder how these these bizarre thoughts race across your mind.

 

Definitely, I agree with you that the ultimate goal is to get down there, but the face is generally what unlocks that desire. Browsing through your Navel to the Knees pictures without a face would be more of a put-off than an attraction IMHO.

 

Imagine, on your Sinder, someone is attracted to what's shown there, but ultimately finds that the upper part resembles something like a Frankenstein...

2 minutes ago, ravip said:

I wonder how these these bizarre thoughts race across your mind.

 

Definitely, I agree with you that the ultimate goal is to get down there, but the face is generally what unlocks that desire. Browsing through your Navel to the Knees pictures without a face would be more of a put-off than an attraction IMHO.

 

Imagine, on your Sinder, someone is attracted to what's shown there, but ultimately finds that the upper part resembles something like a Frankenstein...

 

No need to wonder....

It's just wonderful.

 

Here's one viewpoint 

Hardly a radical concept , check out "naked attraction" on tv in the UK for years,  there are  plenty of clips on you tube

Given the American fixation with oversized mammaries, I am wondering why the American OP did not include them in the field of vision.

12 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

Hardly a radical concept , check out "naked attraction" on tv in the UK for years,  there are  plenty of clips on you tube

You are obviously well traveled.

7 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

You are obviously well traveled.

Try as I might, I have no idea what lead you to make that comment, or what you are trying to imply?  help me me out please

 

1 hour ago, ravip said:

I wonder how these these bizarre thoughts race across your mind.

 

Definitely, I agree with you that the ultimate goal is to get down there, but the face is generally what unlocks that desire. Browsing through your Navel to the Knees pictures without a face would be more of a put-off than an attraction IMHO.

 

Imagine, on your Sinder, someone is attracted to what's shown there, but ultimately finds that the upper part resembles something like a Frankenstein...

one need not  look at the mantlepiece whilst stoking the fire,  as they say

13 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Given the American fixation with oversized mammaries, I am wondering why the American OP did not include them in the field of vision.

 

I love Asian women, as I know that you know.

Also, I love Asian women of yesteryear, as you also know.

 

I am thinking of starting a dating site for Nigerians only. They seem to be very rich and love Thai women.

8 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

Try as I might, I have no idea what lead you to make that comment, or what you are trying to imply?  help me me out please

 

I was referring to your experience with the female of the species. No offence intended.

1 minute ago, Lacessit said:

I was referring to your experience with the female of the species. No offence intended.

I wasn't offended ,  just genuinely confused.  ( still am to be honest) but I thought I would afford you the respect of  asking for  an explanation, rather than using the pathetic "confused" emoji  hope you appreciated that

websites for sideline gals are already suitable at    nice prices

On the other hand would you rather be with a cute, hot, slim slender, educated girl ? Or would you want a lady who is overweight, ugly foolish and broke ?

 

And btw, girls think the same when they pick up a guy (when it's not only for the money of course).