7 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

You're trying to dance on the head of a pin.  Trump is trying to incite someone to violence, just like De Pepe. You well know this.

You're clutching at straws. Anyone without <removed > can what was said and the context it was said in

1 minute ago, dinsdale said:

If I said calling Trump a Nazi and a threat to democracy is inciting someone to violence what would you say because this has been a constant message from Harris.

 

Wake me up when Harris refers to Trump and firearms in the same context.

3 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Whereas you already graduated clown school with flying colours

Much better than being in Putin's front line meat grinder, that you crave....................

7 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

Wake me up when Harris refers to Trump and firearms in the same context.

Really! Talk about soldiers in battle without talking about firearms. What do you think they shoot each other with? It's the waste of life  from the likes of the Cheney war hawks starting up wars that Trump is obviously talking about but you read something else into it. The only thing this does is expose your blind bias. 

Just now, dinsdale said:

Really! Talk about soldiers in battle without talking about firearms. What do you think they shoot each other with? It's the waste of life  from the likes of the Cheney war harks starting up wars that Trump is obviously talking about but you read something else into it. The only thing this does is expose your blind bias. 

 

"Harris" "Firearms" and insults. Is that concise enough for you? You'd fail reading comprehension in elementary school. He's not just holding some dispassionate conversation which happens to mention Harris and firearms without there being a particular point. That particular point is that Trump would love for somebody to act. Crystal clear to anyone other than the true believers.

8 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

If I said calling Trump a Nazi and a threat to democracy is inciting someone to violence what would you say because this has been a constant message from Harris.

😂........No, not just Harris, from sane thinking folk worldwide.......😂

 

You really sound brainwashed, plus you have not told us your thoughts on the Federal Judge's views, why are you dodging that.......?  🤔

Personally I don't agree with publicly announcing going for trump on the matter prior to the election as it will agitate the MAGA people. But, it was an act of gross stupidity, there is zero cause to exposing Cheney to some lunatic motivated by trump's words. If there is a viable legal case act upon it after the election with anticipation he will lose.

4 hours ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

If that's the best the Harris campaign can come up with, she's getting pathetically desperate.

 

Saying someone who wants to send our boys off to war should lead from the front, in the trenches, is threatening violence?

 

No, it's threatening accountability.  Wars are always fun and easy from the safety of your VIP bunker.

What war?

46 minutes ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

What kind of firing squad gives the condemned a rifle?

A cigarette and blindfold, sure, but a rifle?

 

Who do you give a rifle to?  The sons of po' folks without connections, sending them to the front to die for Boeing, while you sit back and congratulate each other for "doing something."

 

Let's put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. OK?

If you are explaining, you are losing.

 

Trump made a gaffe, at a terrible time in the campaign. He has lost 2 days over his mistake.

 

Do I think Trump was advocating execution of Liz Cheney? No. But his words were so inartful that he made a big mess.

23 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Really! Talk about soldiers in battle without talking about firearms. What do you think they shoot each other with? It's the waste of life  from the likes of the Cheney war hawks starting up wars that Trump is obviously talking about but you read something else into it. The only thing this does is expose your blind bias. 

If you are explaining, you are losing.

 

This is not how Trump wanted to finish his last campaign.

2 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

If you are explaining, you are losing.

 

Trump made a gaffe, at a terrible time in the campaign. He has lost 2 days over his mistake.

 

Do I think Trump was advocating execution of Liz Cheney? No. But his words were so inartful that he made a big mess.

If taken in context he simply said how would she feel if the shoe was on the other foot i.e. politicians being sent to war and not the kids. It's as clear as the day is long. It's only the legacy media which is campaigning for Harris that has taken on part of what Trump said and twisted it. This is Trump being Trump and definitely this is not how the campaign should be closed off. He has clarified his remarks but the legacy media from what I've seen are not running it. There is absolutely no way when taken in context that advocating for her execution can be rationally extrapolated.

2 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

If taken in context he simply said how would she feel if the shoe was on the other foot i.e. politicians being sent to war and not the kids. It's as clear as the day is long. It's only the legacy media which is campaigning for Harris that has taken on part of what Trump said and twisted it. This is Trump being Trump and definitely this is not how the campaign should be closed off. He has clarified his remarks but the legacy media from what I've seen are not running it. There is absolutely no way when taken in context that advocating for her execution can be rationally extrapolated.

You're still explaining, which is not what you want to be doing at the end of a campaign.

1 minute ago, Danderman123 said:

You're still explaining, which is not what you want to be doing at the end of a campaign.

Agree and it's great ammo, albeit taken out of context, to move the conversation away from Biden's garbage remarks which were not taken out of context. Tactical error which I'm sure his campaign handlers had a big sigh of disbelief  and palm slaps when Trump went too far down the Cheney is a war hawk line.

Just now, dinsdale said:

Agree and it's great ammo, albeit taken out of context, to move the conversation away from Biden's garbage remarks which were not taken out of context. Tactical error which I'm sure his campaign handlers had a big sigh of disbelief  and palm slaps when Trump went too far down the Cheney is a war hawk line.

Yep. When the enemy is making a mistake, don't interrupt them.

 

Trump may have ended the Cheney blowback by his latest antic. We'll see tomorrow.

3 hours ago, Inderpland said:

And I think you're one - and not a very good one.

 

Ii don't think about u at all but if I did

 

 

1 hour ago, Lacessit said:

Am I reading this correctly? The orange Jesus, stable genius and smart businessman is incapable of picking competent people to work for him?

I think evidence of his failure at hiring good and capable staff is overwhelming.

3 minutes ago, John Drake said:

I think evidence of his failure at hiring good and capable staff is overwhelming.

Including JD Vance.

5 hours ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

If that's the best the Harris campaign can come up with, she's getting pathetically desperate.

 

Saying someone who wants to send our boys off to war should lead from the front, in the trenches, is threatening violence?

 

No, it's threatening accountability.  Wars are always fun and easy from the safety of your VIP bunker.

 

Or you doctor's waiting room awaiting confirmation of bone spurs.

7 minutes ago, John Drake said:

I think evidence of his failure at hiring good and capable staff is overwhelming.

 

Oh! You mean all the ones who have seen through him and denigrated him.....clever.

24 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Agree and it's great ammo, albeit taken out of context, to move the conversation away from Biden's garbage remarks which were not taken out of context. Tactical error which I'm sure his campaign handlers had a big sigh of disbelief  and palm slaps when Trump went too far down the Cheney is a war hawk line.

 

Genuine question....how was it taken out of context?

36 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

You're still explaining, which is not what you want to be doing at the end of a campaign.

 

Understood.

 

"When did you stop beating your wife?"

 

Gotcha!!!!!!!

13 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

Genuine question....how was it taken out of context?

If you look at the video I posted above you will see it's about Liz Cheney being a war hark and wanting to pick fights with countries. Trump basically says put a gun in her hand with nine guns pointed at her head and see how she feels about sending people to war then. Basically put her in the shoes of the soldiers and she'd quickly change her hawkish views. People forget that Trump was actually anti Iraq war. Look at the YT post for yourself. See if you think he's asking for her to be put in front of a firing squad as a previous poster has said or invoking firearm violence against her. I'll reattach it. Starts 7:20.

 

 

 

 “She’s a radical war hawk. Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, OK? Let’s see how she feels about it, you know, when the guns are trained on her face.”

 

He's not the sharpest knife in the drawer making such a statement at this moment in time.

 

I wonder how he feels about Putin the war hawk....11,500 Ukrainians dead?

5 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Any other citizen would have seen the FBI at their door.

 

For saying that someone would be unable to handle being in a firefight?  Why?

5 hours ago, billd766 said:

Even more pathetic morons for defending Trump.

 

Pathetic morons for pointing out a lie?  What about the people who told the lie, or shared it here, or are now defending a lie?  Aren't they pathetic morons?

8 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

If you look at the video I posted above you will see it's about Liz Cheney being a war hark and wanting to pick fights with countries. Trump basically says put a gun in her hand with nine guns pointed at her head and see how she feels about sending people to war then. Basically put her in the shoes of the soldiers and she'd quickly change her hawkish views. People forget that Trump was actually anti Iraq war. Look at the YT post for yourself. See if you think he's asking for her to be put in front of a firing squad as a previous poster has said or invoking firearm violence against her. I'll reattach it. Starts 7:20.

 

 

Or is this another example of 'Trump the Amazing Troller'......knowing exactly what he was saying....but not actually saying it????

7 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

If you look at the video I posted above you will see it's about Liz Cheney being a war hark and wanting to pick fights with countries. Trump basically says put a gun in her hand with nine guns pointed at her head and see how she feels about sending people to war then. Basically put her in the shoes of the soldiers and she'd quickly change her hawkish views. People forget that Trump was actually anti Iraq war. Look at the YT post for yourself. See if you think he's asking for her to be put in front of a firing squad as a previous poster has said or invoking firearm violence against her. I'll reattach it. Starts 7:20.

 

Those on the left have a very short narrow attention span, so it’s completely useless and futile trying to explain anything to them, they simply can’t keep up with context is why they rely on the media to repetitiously reiterate tidbits of partial misinformation. 

53 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Yep. When the enemy is making a mistake, don't interrupt them.

 

Trump may have ended the Cheney blowback by his latest antic. We'll see tomorrow.

 

There was quite a bit of pushback against Cheney from the liberal left I thought. I guess that will evaporate now.

15 minutes ago, novacova said:

Those on the left have a very short narrow attention span, so it’s completely useless and futile trying to explain anything to them, they simply can’t keep up with context is why they rely on the media to repetitiously reiterate tidbits of partial misinformation. 

 

 

That has to be the most ridiculous post of the month.....and the competition was strong....you really are a small lump of butter.

2 hours ago, pattayasan said:

Still can't grasp the concept? There is no context in which invoking firearms in respect to a political opponent is not an incitement to violence. None.

But calling Trump Hitler and fascist and dictator and end of democracy and we have to put a bullseye on him is fine, got it.