Jump to content

Fact-Checking Rogan and Musk


rwilem

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

3 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

No they have not. They are classsed as confidential, unless a request is made.

 

10 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

Because every president since the criminal Nixon has done so until the criminal trump. It's designed to bolster public confidence that they aren't compromised by some foreign power (cough) or corrupted. His recent returns are especially important to ensure he has not violated the Emoluments Clause. There's every reason to believe trump has done so.

 

 

Sharing tax returns with the public was the modern norm until Donald Trump

 

https://www.investopedia.com/history-of-presidents-and-federal-income-tax-what-s-normal-5080237

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Oh, I thought you said: "Because every president since the criminal Nixon has done so until the criminal trump."

 

But now you've changed it to everyone running. How about a link to Cornell West's returns? 

 

Or John Kerry's 2004 return? 

 

Still waiting for your links.......🥴

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trumpers only want the immigrant they like. The once's that vote for them or marry them.

Unfortunately for Trump nice people from "Norway" don't want to live in a third world country under a Trump dictatorship. Clever people these Norwegians, compared to this lot on AN. O, wait you don't actually live in the States 5555

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This Topic has already DISTORTED the actual meaning of what it is to be liberal.

 

Also, no point in fact-checking Rogan.

He does not know enough to be accurate about anything, in the first place.

 

When he makes mistakes, they are not intentional, but rather just due to his ignorance and stupidity.

 

He holds himself out to be an authority, a fount of knowledge.

Yet he is as shallow as the shallowest of pools.

 

Rogan's only strength is that he has somehow managed to gather around him a veritable army of dumb-A followers, who are even dumber than Xi's 50-cent army.

 

Rogan and his ignorance is dangerous, at least in some ways.

 

I never heard of this man of short stature until last week.

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

What became of it, Frank? What do you think?

Maybe not; I’ve already seen your thoughts here.
 

Nevertheless, in closing, I hope you get through tomorrow okay; this may be of some comfort:


FOUR STAGES OF LOSS

  1. Denial: Refusing to accept the reality of the loss.
  2. Anger: Feeling frustration and helplessness, often directed toward others or oneself.
  3. Bargaining: Trying to negotiate or make deals to reverse the loss or lessen the pain.
  4. Acceptance: Coming to terms with the reality of the loss and finding a way to move forward.

So what happens after the returns were given, 2015-20

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

No, I mean her parents were on the teat in academia, and she was on the teat when she got a job in the DA's office, and then with Willie Brown's help she got a few plum appointments on the teat and then again due to Willie's influence won a couple of elections. 

 

The only non-public trough job she's has was McDonald's and she apparently lied about that.

 

 

Harris is a Obama protege! A 

Installed Social Justice Warrior . The only difference  between the Chicago community activist ,Obama vs the Blm supporter ,Harris is Obama threw the BS better with his debate skills!

Edited by riclag
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, G_Money said:


Has this been approved by the polling and early voting expert?  If you’re not sure who that person is, let me know.

Stupid comment. If you disagree how about posting what you think the number might/will be.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GammaGlobulin said:

This Topic has already DISTORTED the actual meaning of what it is to be liberal.

 

Also, no point in fact-checking Rogan.

He does not know enough to be accurate about anything, in the first place.

 

When he makes mistakes, they are not intentional, but rather just due to his ignorance and stupidity.

 

He holds himself out to be an authority, a fount of knowledge.

Yet he is as shallow as the shallowest of pools.

 

Rogan's only strength is that he has somehow managed to gather around him a veritable army of dumb-A followers, who are even dumber than Xi's 50-cent army.

 

Rogan and his ignorance is dangerous, at least in some ways.

 

I never heard of this man of short stature until last week.

 

 

A day ago you said you barely heard of him, now you're a Rogan expert,  your comments are on par with transmans, maybe its dementia.  

  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Oh, I thought you said: "Because every president since the criminal Nixon has done so until the criminal trump."

 

But now you've changed it to everyone running. How about a link to Cornell West's returns? 

 

Or John Kerry's 2004 return?

 

Did I change it somewhere? It was always about trump's tax returns. Ask me about Harris' tax returns. Every president merely indicated it was the norm which you falsely refuted.

Edited by pattayasan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump 287 Harris 251. Disagree then tell us what you think the numbers will be. Predictive/betting markets are rapidly widening the gap in Trump's favour. A laughing emoji attached isn't good enough. Come on you blue blinkered progressive woke voters. What are your EC numbers for a Harris victory? Put your money where your mouth is so to speak. Now's the time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

So what happens after the returns were given, 2015-20

After the returns were taken, Frank, they fueled multiple investigations. Here’s a snapshot:

  1. NY Criminal Case: Examining the Trump Organization’s financial practices for possible fraud.
  2. NY Civil Suit: AG Letitia James is suing over inflated asset values for loans and insurance.
  3. IRS Audits: Questions arose about why his audits didn’t catch these discrepancies.
  4. January 6 Committee: Financial disclosures fed into inquiries about funding sources and conflicts.

In short, the returns helped prove your messiah a crook. Accountability has a way of catching up.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

So, the normally confidential returns were demanded politically then used politically by L James to file charges against trump that nobody else would have be charged with, gotcha.

 

Damn, the evidence of illegality was unfairly obtained. He's innocent.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, pattayasan said:

 

Damn, the evidence of illegality was unfairly obtained. He's innocent.

Politically motivated as I said but you can now stop bleeting about not having his tax returns, as you claimed 20 posts ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

Politically motivated as I said but you can now stop bleeting about not having his tax returns, as you claimed 20 posts ago.

 

We still don't have the current tax returns. You're moaning about ancient history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

So, the normally confidential returns were demanded politically then used politically by L James to file charges against trump that nobody else would have be charged with, gotcha.

Not quite, Frank. For a president, tax returns aren’t exactly 'normally confidential'—transparency’s expected. The returns revealed potential fraud—plain and simple. Any business inflating assets for loans would face consequences. This isn’t a ‘gotcha’—it’s called the law, and even your messiah isn’t above it.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

A day ago you said you barely heard of him, now you're a Rogan expert,  your comments are on par with transmans, maybe its dementia.  

 

Not really dementia, in my case.

 

I am a very "fast-study".

 

Just listening to a few words from Rogan, and I am amazingly accurate at detecting someone who has a Giant Ego, Supreme Overconfidence, resulting in the spread of BS and inaccuracies around the world.

 

Similar to Alex Jones, and Deepak Chopra, and many more.

 

I would never do such a thing.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Not quite, Frank. For a president, tax returns aren’t exactly 'normally confidential'—transparency’s expected. The returns revealed potential fraud—plain and simple. Any business inflating assets for loans would face consequences. This isn’t a ‘gotcha’—it’s called the law, and even your messiah isn’t above it.

Theyare classed as confidential unless special requests are filed, its in the link you originally told me to read.

The fraud for inflating a business Is politicially motivated, the banks were happy, there was no victim, Kevin O'Leary, said so himself, and that he would no longer do business in NYC, it caused lack of confidence in investing in NY , and worried the governor to to point she make a statement assuring other business owners ' not to worry, it wouldnt happen to them.

Ibwill be happy to see these 'Trumped' up charges dismissed soon after his win tomorrow 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hamus Yaigh said:

Musk is a smart guy. He knows how to spin a story his way when his own personal interests are at stake. We all heard what Trump said and Musk is spinning it.

But.... even average people can figure out that Musk is making shït up.  How long has Full Self Driving mode on a Tesla been "just around the corner"?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

So what happens after the returns were given, 2015-20

Unfortunately, the only sources you trust won't provide anything useful on that topic.  Just go back to your usual news diet of anxiety and outrage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...