Why experts are blasting Trump for 'already breaking the law'

[Yellowtail]

9 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

experts! hahahaha

"appeal to authority" 

[Lacessit]

16 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

No, you did not, there is nothing from you on this thread to that effect.  However, I would and you cannot claim it to be factual that every lawyer requires payment up front, suggesting he needs to pay everything up front.  Having to pay a retainer is different, if that is what you refer to, and is normal in cases that will require a lot of lawyer hours, all lawyers require that, it not something that is peculiar to Trump and his lawyers. 

That's because the posts were on a different thread,  " Giuliani claims financial hardship"

 

You would work for Trump in arrears? That's what Giuliani did, look where it has got him.

[gamb00ler]

14 hours ago, nattaya09 said:

 

There's not too many less credible voices than Liz Warren. As far as experts, Covid and the Climate Change zealots taught us there are a couple of different kids of experts, those that can be bought or intimidated into shilling someone elses narrative and those that can be cancelled, censored or otherwise ostracized by those advancing a narrative

I would love to wager a significant sum that on the topic of governmental conflicts of interest and its prevention, she know a LOT more than you.  Best to not pretend you are well informed when you are not.

Edited 4 hours ago by gamb00ler

[gamb00ler]

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

But he still has plenty of contractors, lawyers, and individuals that work for him, and still seems be able to book most any venue he likes. 

 

How funny is that? 

You don't think that they know they're trapped in a NO WIN situation?

[Yellowtail]

13 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

You don't think that they know they're trapped in a NO WIN situation?

What I said was: 

 

"All the high IQ leftists claim that Trump had cheated every contractor, lawyer, venue, and individual that has worked for him since the '70s. 

 

But he still has plenty of contractors, lawyers, and individuals that work for him, and still seems be able to book most any venue he likes. 

 

How funny is that?"

 

And the response from the high IQ leftist is: "You don't think that they know they're trapped in a NO WIN situation?", which is even funnier.

 

So per the high IQ left, they've been working since the '70s without getting paid, because they're rapped in a NO WIN situation. 

 

Dude cracks me up. 

[johng]

4 hours ago, simple1 said:

especially with Health Care & Justice systems with nut cases running them,

Nut case being you ?

 

[bangadang]

On 11/12/2024 at 8:09 PM, pattayasan said:

Trump is immune from prosecution and so doesn't need to sign the law. He also has a friendly SC to cover for him.

 "experts"  so funny I know an "expert" who says Warren is not a Native American as she claims

[gamb00ler]

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

And the response from the high IQ leftist is: "You don't think that they know they're trapped in a NO WIN situation?", which is even funnier.

 

So per the high IQ left, they've been working since the '70s without getting paid, because they're rapped in a NO WIN situation. 

 

Dude cracks me up. 

I should have realized that I needed two or three diagrams and more small words for you to figure out what I meant.

And then you would argue that your favorite con man would never retaliate with lawsuits and defamation when a venue, lawyer or contractor refused to deal with him.

[Yellowtail]

13 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

I should have realized that I needed two or three diagrams and more small words for you to figure out what I meant.

And then you would argue that your favorite con man would never retaliate with lawsuits and defamation when a venue, lawyer or contractor refused to deal with him.

So why don't you explain it? Oh, that's right, you're a leftist, all you can do is regurgitate nonsense, you can actually explain anything. 

 

Again, what I said was: All the high IQ leftists claim that Trump had cheated every contractor, lawyer, venue, and individual that has worked for him since the '70s, but he still has plenty of contractors, lawyers, and individuals that work for him, and still seems be able to book most any venue he likes. 

 

Your response was: "You don't think that they know they're trapped in a NO WIN situation?", which is even funnier.

 

So please dial in your super high IQ leftist brain and explain it?