AlexRich Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Kamala Harris would not have been the candidate had Biden done what he said he would - be a one term President and make way for new blood. When he stepped down Obama spoke of a contest to select a new candidate, but that was quickly shut down when Biden backed Harris. No contest, just a fait accompli. 1
Jingthing Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 24 minutes ago, LALes said: Democratic party is completely bankrupt. They have nobody on the bench. I don't care what Bill Clinton says. Good luck finding a viable candidate for 2028. This from a 75-year-old lifelong Democrat. My parents were Stevenson democrats. This 21st century mob is the worst. I wouldn't vote for them with your dick. That's ridiculous. The reason we got Harris this time was because Biden made the mistake of running for the nomination and dropped out last minute. Just because you don't know about the democratic bench doesn't mean they don't have one.
Jingthing Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 18 minutes ago, AlexRich said: Kamala Harris would not have been the candidate had Biden done what he said he would - be a one term President and make way for new blood. When he stepped down Obama spoke of a contest to select a new candidate, but that was quickly shut down when Biden backed Harris. No contest, just a fait accompli. Most likely true so sadly that is on Biden. If Harris had emerged from a normal primary process, which is very doubtful, at least she would have been a better seasoned candidate.
metisdead Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Posts with derogatory nicknames, intentional misspellings, or personal remarks will be removed. Spell names correctly for all sides of the debate.
Chosenfew Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 15 hours ago, Jingthing said: Autocratic regimes sometimes come into power via elections. Such Orban, Putin, and Hitler. So you have said, over and over… Hitler loving MickyD.
WDSmart Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 16 hours ago, ModdaPunk said: How dumb can they be ? Kamala Harris is the top choice of Democrat voters to be the party’s nominee for the 2028 presidential election, with 41 per cent support in a recent poll. Other top contenders for the Democratic nomination in 2028 include Gavin Newsom, Josh Shapiro, and Pete Buttigieg, who received 8, 7, and 6 per cent support respectively. Despite her loss in the 2024 election, some in the Democratic party believe Kamala Harris would be well-positioned to run again in 2028 due to her wide base of donors and support among congressional Democrats. Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/democrats-want-kamala-harris-run-210148541.html The Democrats (including me) don't have a "Death Wish"; we have a "Life Wish." Harris didn't do so badly. She did get about 48% of the popular vote in this election. Trump lost the last election but was still nominated by the Republican Party this time - and won. Why wouldn't Harris still be considered? I, however, would prefer someone like Pete Buttigieg, even though I know the majority of my fellow USA citizens are not ready for someone like him...yet. But after four years of Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress, they might be willing to vote for any Democrat nominated. 1
Jingthing Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Chosenfew said: So you have said, over and over… Hitler loving MickyD. I never said he was literally Hitler. Of course he isn't literally Hitler. Even JD Vance his VP who has apparently been replaced by co-president and corrupt oligarch Elon Musk understood that when he wondered if Trump would be America's Hitler. Not literally Hitler. There was just the one.
connda Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 16 hours ago, ModdaPunk said: Despite her loss in the 2024 election, some in the Democratic party believe Kamala Harris would be well-positioned to run again in 2028 due to her wide base of donors and support among congressional Democrats. I do hope they run her in 2028. 🙏
Hummin Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 33 minutes ago, WDSmart said: The Democrats (including me) don't have a "Death Wish"; we have a "Life Wish." Harris didn't do so badly. She did get about 48% of the popular vote in this election. Trump lost the last election but was still nominated by the Republican Party this time - and won. Why wouldn't Harris still be considered? I, however, would prefer someone like Pete Buttigieg, even though I know the majority of my fellow USA citizens are not ready for someone like him...yet. But after four years of Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress, they might be willing to vote for any Democrat nominated. There is a huge difference, Trump never rolled over on his back and said he lost, he kept on telling the American people he won, and never gave in. True or noth, Americans seems to believe in certain lies and lies that continiously being repeated over and over again and again. Mix that with American Wrestling show, and you got the American hearth 1
WDSmart Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 9 minutes ago, Hummin said: There is a huge difference, Trump never rolled over on his back and said he lost, he kept on telling the American people he won, and never gave in. True or noth, Americans seems to believe in certain lies and lies that continiously being repeated over and over again and again. Mix that with American Wrestling show, and you got the American hearth Yes! I recently was skipping through the channels on my TV and saw Trump and Musk sitting in the front row in a UFC match! 😄
dinsdale Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 16 hours ago, Jingthing said: More likely to find her on the dinner theater circuit. Did you know as a teenager in Montreal she was a theater kid? Doesn't surprise me at all. It certainly seemed as though she remembered her lines very well indeed. She was also exceptional at changing her accent to suit the situation.
ModdaPunk Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, WDSmart said: Trump lost the last election but was still nominated by the Republican Party this time - and won. Why wouldn't Harris still be considered? That's actually a pretty good point 1
dinsdale Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Doesn't matter who they run, if they maintain the progressive woke left agenda they will lose. 1
Hanaguma Posted 24 minutes ago Posted 24 minutes ago 2 hours ago, ModdaPunk said: That's actually a pretty good point Possibly because he had also won once before that?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now