Jump to content

Boris Johnson Accuses Starmer of Aligning with Hamas Over ICC Netanyahu Arrest Warrant


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

Former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has launched a scathing attack on Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer, accusing him of "effectively standing with Hamas" following the International Criminal Court's (ICC) issuance of an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Writing in his Daily Mail column, Johnson alleged that Starmer and Labour have implicitly supported the ICC's actions, which also target former Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant for alleged war crimes related to the Gaza conflict.  

 

Johnson criticized what he called Labour’s “acceptance of moral equivalence between Hamas and Israel," accusing the opposition party of equating “terrorists and their victims.” His comments reflect growing tensions surrounding the UK government’s stance on the ICC's decisions. While Downing Street affirmed its respect for the ICC's independence, it declined to rule out enforcing the arrest warrant if Netanyahu were to visit the UK.  

 

The UK, as one of the 123 member states of the ICC, is obliged to uphold the court's rulings. The ICC also issued a warrant for Hamas commander Mohammed Deif, whom Israel claimed was killed in an airstrike earlier this year.  

 

Johnson’s criticism extended beyond Starmer to the ICC itself. "Instead of standing with Israel, Starmer is effectively standing with Hamas—because he has cravenly endorsed the request, from the International Criminal Court, that the leaders of Israel should be charged with war crimes," Johnson wrote. He questioned the sincerity of Starmer’s past support for Israel, describing his previous expressions of solidarity following the October 7 Hamas terror attacks as “guff, hypocrisy, and blather.”  

 

He further argued that the ICC’s actions were misplaced, stating, “We are treating them like Slobodan Milosevic and Ratko Mladic, the butchers of the Balkans, when this ICC case is patently absurd. The Hague court is designed for tyrants—like Putin or Milosevic—who have no chance of facing justice in their own country. The ICC is supposed to ‘complement’ any potential failure of due process.”  

 

Dame Priti Patel, the shadow foreign secretary, also expressed alarm, labeling the ICC decision as “deeply concerning and provocative.” She warned that it could hinder efforts to release hostages and deliver critical aid to Gaza.  

 

International backlash against the ICC’s move has been swift, with the United States and allies condemning the decision. A White House spokesperson dismissed the arrest warrants, emphasizing the lack of US jurisdiction under the ICC and citing procedural flaws in the prosecutor’s actions. President Joe Biden’s administration expressed "deep concern" about the implications of the court’s rulings.  

 

Donald Trump’s allies also criticized the ICC, with his pick for National Security Advisor, Mike Waltz, declaring on X: “The ICC has no credibility, and these allegations have been refuted by the US government.”  

 

Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-11-25

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

news-footer-4.png

 

image.png

  • Like 1
Posted

Unfortunatly Britain is a member of The ICC and as such has to abide by it's rulings. 

Boris  the clown is aware of this. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Social Media said:

While Downing Street affirmed its respect for the ICC's independence, it declined to rule out enforcing the arrest warrant if Netanyahu were to visit the UK.  

I thought it was mandatory if a country had signed on to the ICC. If countries just made up their own rules it'd be chaos............................... oh wait!

 

I used to support Johnson, but he just lost 1 supporter.

Posted
36 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

Amazing decision by Starmer to support this resolution. On 7 October  2023 Palestinians murdered over 1,700 Israeli civilians, including the rape and beheading of women, children and infants. How much lower can the UK go ?

IMO ICC rulings are binding on signatories to the ICC.

 

Israel killed over 40,000 Palestinians. Seems a more than adequate pay back.

Now it's just blood lust, IMO.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, jippytum said:

Unfortunatly Britain is a member of The ICC and as such has to abide by it's rulings. 

Boris  the clown is aware of this. 

Was the ICC only doing the "right thing" when it was just Africans and Middle East characters that were being arrested? Is it different when it's a western ally?

No wonder so many people's of the world hate the west, with it's hypocrisy and forever wars.

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

IMO ICC rulings are binding on signatories to the ICC.

 

Israel killed over 40,000 Palestinians. Seems a more than adequate pay back.

Now it's just blood lust, IMO.

Havent seen the filithy terrorist scum (the Lefts foot soldiers) surrender yet. Thats how wars end.  One side says "uncle"

Posted

I don't get all the mass hysteria. If netanyahu and the other guy are innocent of the crimes they are accused of they will get off, won't they? Seems to me that all the vocal opponents of the ICC think they must be guilty, LOL.

Posted
1 hour ago, Donga said:

Take care how you perceive Justice these days.

Left wing institutions like Biden administration and the UN have shown Justice has lost its way, most unfortunately. The extent of the abuse, waste of money and hypocrisy is breathtaking

If the ICC was truly impartial, there would be warrants for so many feudal lords across Africa, responsible for countless deaths and misery. They would be joined by leaders in Iran and Afghanistan for their support of terrorism and destruction of women's rights.

The ICC is a joke and fortunately has little power, other than typical left wing symbolism.

Exactly. Maybe the US Justice Department should indict the entire ICC for providing material support to terrorists.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Social Media said:

Donald Trump’s allies also criticized the ICC, with his pick for National Security Advisor, Mike Waltz, declaring on X: “The ICC has no credibility, and these allegations have been refuted by the US government.”  

The US doesn't recognise the ICC anyway, so Waltz can stick his opinion where the sun don't shine.

Refuted by the US government? :cheesy:

Posted
1 hour ago, Donga said:

Take care how you perceive Justice these days.

Left wing institutions like Biden administration and the UN have shown Justice has lost its way, most unfortunately. The extent of the abuse, waste of money and hypocrisy is breathtaking

If the ICC was truly impartial, there would be warrants for so many feudal lords across Africa, responsible for countless deaths and misery. They would be joined by leaders in Iran and Afghanistan for their support of terrorism and destruction of women's rights.

The ICC is a joke and fortunately has little power, other than typical left wing symbolism.

Did you miss out Tony Blair and George Bush for war crimes?

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member




×
×
  • Create New...