JimTripper Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) My lease expires in less then a month. I contacted both the landlord and the real estate agent and expressed by desire to renew. The landlord told me privately that she would prefer that I tell the real estate agent that I moved out so she did not have to pay their fee for a new lease renewal, and that I just keep paying rent as usual and could remain in the unit. I'm worried about getting the deposit back at some point if I'm not on a lease and the real estate agent is out of the picture. It also feels weird to not have a lease. I have never met the landlord and only send line messages. It's just a line contact the juristic person here gave me. Also, I paid the deposit in cash to the real estate agent initially. The agent is trying to do a lease renewal but the landlord has not signed off and I'm running out of time to find a new condo. It's also unclear if the lease expires or if it self-renews. It says to give 30 days notice to move out, but also says contact the agent to renew. Should I just move out if the lease is not signed by the expiration date or stay and keep paying rent? Edited 2 hours ago by JimTripper
Celsius Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago If landlords is so cheap to screw the agent, I expect you will not be getting your deposit back if you move out now.
JimTripper Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 11 minutes ago, Celsius said: If landlords is so cheap to screw the agent, I expect you will not be getting your deposit back if you move out now. There might be a problem between the agent and the landlord. Initially, I just communicated through the agent. Then the juristic person here contacted me and wanted my Line or phone number for the owner. He said, the owner communicated to him that the agent would not answer their messages. So I got caught in a triangle of sorts. That's about the last thing I want to do in Thailand with someone holding my deposit (30k). Edited 2 hours ago by JimTripper
dddave Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Most landlords have to pay an ongoing share of the rent to the agent so your landlord is likely trying to duck that monthly payment. You would have to depend on the landlord for the documents needed for your TM-30, not easy without a copy of the lease. When my condo owner started renting to me directly after my original lease expired, we still paid another agent to draw up a legal lease so I would have the document. The original agent wasn't happy but couldn't do anything about it. She had lied to him about the original rent I was paying and pocketing the difference. 1
JimTripper Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago 10 minutes ago, dddave said: Most landlords have to pay an ongoing share of the rent to the agent so your landlord is likely trying to duck that monthly payment. You would have to depend on the landlord for the documents needed for your TM-30, not easy without a copy of the lease. When my condo owner started renting to me directly after my original lease expired, we still paid another agent to draw up a legal lease so I would have the document. The original agent wasn't happy but couldn't do anything about it. She had lied to him about the original rent I was paying and pocketing the difference. Who do you think is actually holding the deposit, the agent or the landlord?
JBChiangRai Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Your lease should be with the landlord not the agent. It’s not valid if it’s with the agent. I don’t use agent’s contracts, I write my own and I renew directly with tenants after the first year and I do not pay Agent commission for the second and subsequent years because they do no work for it as it’s my contract.
CanadaSam Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago I would first consult to owner to confirm that they have your deposit. If so, then draw up a simple lease and sign directly with landlord. If not, then you have a problem as agent will want to see empty, clean condo before returning your deposit.
JimTripper Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 12 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said: Your lease should be with the landlord not the agent. It’s not valid if it’s with the agent. I don’t use agent’s contracts, I write my own and I renew directly with tenants after the first year and I do not pay Agent commission for the second and subsequent years because they do no work for it as it’s my contract. I agree. The only reason I would want to renew through the agent is the leverage factor in getting the deposit back. It looks like they are listed as a third party or witness on the lease, not the principal. They take pictures before and after and document it all. If the deposit is not returned for a good reason their reputation is at stake. They may also pressure the landlord legally to return the deposit, but I'm not sure. If I'm not drawn up on a current dated lease with them as a third party I think I'm on my own though. Edited 2 hours ago by JimTripper
Liverpool Lou Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 34 minutes ago, dddave said: Most landlords have to pay an ongoing share of the rent to the agent No, they do not. Agents are remunerated with (usually) one month's rent at the start of the lease period, they do not get ongoing commission throughout the period as your comment suggested.
Dante99 Posted 54 minutes ago Posted 54 minutes ago to extend your stay just make a simple lease with your landlord showing that the 30k deposit is made already and the landlord acknowledges receipt. If the landlord signs that lease you are good to go Do not think you have a problem when you do not really know.
scubascuba3 Posted 22 minutes ago Posted 22 minutes ago Get a new lease agreement with the landlord, if he can't do that continue with the old agent process
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now