Biden pardons Hunter.

[DD86]

6 hours ago, transam said:

Isn't Trump going to pardon the convicted felons who invaded the White House, if he does, that is waaaaaaaaaay worse than Biden taking care of his son......

Oh c'mon, people convicted by the left. Stazi practice.

[DD86]

7 hours ago, simple1 said:

 

trump  also provides pardons for convicted criminals who support him. It's interesting the number of people in trump's orbit who are convicted for criminal offices compared to Biden. However, if you were the father and had the power would you not pardon for non violent offences? Below Biden gives his reasoning, sounds just like trump....

 

Biden said in the statement that he decided to issue the pardon because his son was “selectively, and unfairly, prosecuted,” saying that “Hunter was treated differently” from people who commit similar crimes.

>It's interesting the number of people in trump's orbit who are convicted for criminal offices compared to Biden<

That's a wrong comparison and you know it. This is polarizing since the inquisition was and is performed by the left.

[blaze master]

 

Almost every reply to this by the left has been but but but Trump.

 

 

[Eric Loh]

1 hour ago, theblether said:

 

Rumor floating around that Biden will pardon himself. Incredible if true ( and I don't believe it ). 

I think you meant Trump will pardon himself. Biden has done nothing wrong to incriminate him. Meanwhile felon Trump has a litany of convictions and more pending after he leave office. 

Edited 2 hours ago by Eric Loh
wrong word

[impulse]

11 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

I think you meant Trump will pardon himself. Biden has done nothing wrong to incriminate him. Meanwhile felon Trump has a litany of convictions and more pending after he leave office. 

 

You apparently didn't read the Hur Report, nor the House Committee records on the Biden Crime Family investigation.  He's got plenty to worry about, right after his protections as the sitting president end.   As a practical matter, there was no way they could impeach him with a Dem majority in the senate.  Once he's a private citizen the gloves can come off.

 

Keep in mind, the Hur Report just recommended not pressing charges.  That recommendation isn't binding on the next DOJ.  You really ought to read the House reports if you want to know all they have on the Bidens.  Not just Joe.  And now that Hunter can't stand behind the 5th amendment protections, they can haul his butt in and depose him.  But they need to do it after the blanket pardon, so he can't lie and get away with it.

 

Edited 1 hour ago by impulse

[NORDO]

Mr. O'Biden repeatedly pledged not to pardon his son, who was convicted in June of three separate felony charges related to his purchase of a revolver in 2018 when he was battling an addiction to illegal drugs, which he lied about on paperwork to obtain the gun, and pleaded guilty to nine tax evasion charges in a separate case September.

 

O'Biden  said that “Hunter was treated differently” from people who commit similar crimes.

 

Correct.   Hunter is free, while a myriad of others that committed the same and lesser crimes are incarcerated presently.

Edited 1 hour ago by NORDO
maga

[impulse]

1 hour ago, theblether said:

The implications and wording of this pardon are astounding. 

 

It will be interesting to see if it stands with the wording that pardons him for any and all crimes, whether they've been exposed yet or not. 

 

I'd be surprised if that stands up to judicial scrutiny.  Not that I claim any legal expertise, but it just sounds dodgy.  I can't imagine that's what the framers of the Constitution intended.

 

Edited 1 hour ago by impulse

[Eric Loh]

37 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

You apparently didn't read the Hur Report, nor the House Committee records on the Biden Crime Family investigation.  He's got plenty to worry about, right after his protections as the sitting president end.   As a practical matter, there was no way they could impeach him with a Dem majority in the senate.  Once he's a private citizen the gloves can come off.

 

Keep in mind, the Hur Report just recommended not pressing charges.  That recommendation isn't binding on the next DOJ.  You really ought to read the House reports if you want to know all they have on the Bidens.  Not just Joe.  And now that Hunter can't stand behind the 5th amendment protections, they can haul his butt in and depose him.  But they need to do it after the blanket pardon, so he can't lie and get away with it.

 

 

Hur's report stated that there was no prove of willful intent, End of story even for Trump's DOJ. The House Oversight spent considerable time in their investigation and found no evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden. The report also didn't had any spefic articles of impeachment. No crime no charge even if the GOP continue to spend tax payers money on a wild goose chase. 

[riclag]

55 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

It will be interesting to see if it stands with the wording that pardons him for any and all crimes, whether they've been exposed yet or not. 

 

I'd be surprised if that stands up to judicial scrutiny.  Not that I claim any legal expertise, but it just sounds dodgy.  I can't imagine that's what the framers of the Constitution intended.

 

We can expect Bondi to come clean with Joes Recorded conversation under oath that his Right hand man( Garland) avoided to make public to the oversite committee.

Joe lied to everyone!

No one is above the law, lie.

He lied about never meeting his sons business partners!

Now he lied about a pardon!

 

Oversite will need someone other than James Comer to head the committee! He’s not ruthless enough.

Edited 42 minutes ago by riclag

[blaze master]

1 hour ago, Eric Loh said:

I think you meant Trump will pardon himself. Biden has done nothing wrong to incriminate him. Meanwhile felon Trump has a litany of convictions and more pending after he leave office. 

 

But but but Trump. I see you aren't coping well either. 

[riclag]

18 minutes ago, blaze master said:

 

But but but Trump. I see you aren't coping well either. 

Im convinced that heads must role!

The left has to be taught a lesson on 

using Stalinist Lawfare tactics!

 

we call it being held accountable!

The left calls it seeking retribution!

 

[transam]

2 minutes ago, riclag said:

Im convinced that heads must role!

The left has to be taught a lesson on 

using Stalinist Lawfare tactics!

 

we call it being held accountable!

The left calls it seeking retribution!

 

Your future Pressy has not been made accountable, how many days has he spent in court for one thing or another, became a felon too................😂

[blaze master]

8 minutes ago, transam said:

Your future Pressy has not been made accountable, how many days has he spent in court for one thing or another, became a felon too................😂

 

How many days has he spent in jail ? 

[blaze master]

10 minutes ago, transam said:

Your future Pressy has not been made accountable, how many days has he spent in court for one thing or another, became a felon too................😂

 

Also ps...didn't you get the memo ? Most of the charges are bs and the population doesn't seem to care about it all.

[G_Money]

2 hours ago, blaze master said:

 

Almost every reply to this by the left has been but but but Trump.

 

 

Soon we’ll be hearing “It was Trump's fault”.

[pedro01]

Him pardoning his son is not a shocker.

 

The shocker is what he's pardoned him for - absolutely ANYTHING he's done in the past decade. ANYTHING. 

 

This isn't a pardon for a conviction - or a specific crime - it's all crimes, including stuff Joe knows about but has not yet been uncovered. 

 

This will blow back in a spectactular fashion!

[transam]

2 minutes ago, blaze master said:

 

How many days has he spent in jail ? 

None yet, the Prezzy thing has stalled everything, though he may pardon himself when he actually takes over...........😋

[pedro01]

4 hours ago, sqwakvfr said:

Hunter Biden is the classic addict.  No such thing as a former addict.  Give him time he will be involved in narcoitcs, prostitution or both.  Next time dad will not be in a position to do much and even the friendly SS agent might not be there.  

 

No such thing as a "former addict" 

 

So let me get this right - someone addicted to cocaine, that no longer takes is - is not a "former addict" in your book?