Jump to content

COVID Vaccines Could INTEGRATE with Human DNA: Yale Research


Recommended Posts

Posted

It's Very Bad News for those that were coereced/conned/mainpulated in taking the '100% safe and effective' mRNA-shots under the guise of 'protecting' their health.  But these research findings by a Yale University team headed by mRNA Vax-promoter Dr. Akiko IWASAKI won't go away by ignoring them. 

Yale scientists: Covid spike protein found in blood of individuals two years after they received injections

by WorldTribune Staff, December 20, 2024

 

The Covid spike protein was found in the blood of people up to two years after they received the Covid mRNA injection, a team of scientists at Yale University have found.

The individuals in the study were never infected with Covid, antibody tests show. The immune system normally rapidly destroy newly produced spike proteins. The finding suggests some people who took the shots may be making the proteins on their own.

“The spike proteins shouldn’t be there,” Alex Berenson noted in a Dec. 19 Unreported Truths Substack.com analysis. “A possible reason is that genetic material delivered in the shots has integrated with human genes and is continuing to activate protein-making structures in our cells. If found to be correct, this explanation has serious implications for mRNA vaccine safety and the more than 1 billion people who received mRNA Covid doses.”

The head of the Yale team, Dr. Akiko Iwasaki, is a scientist who had strongly advocated for the Covid jabs.

Iwasaki is a former president of the American Association of Immunologists. In May 2021, she told The Washington Post that concerns about mRNA shots were “absurd” and added that “no safety concerns” had been found in their clinical trials. She later signed a letter advocating Covid vaccine mandates.

At an October town hall, Iwasaki reported that the team had found Covid spike protein in a study participant more than 700 days after the person’s last mRNA shot, and in others more than 450 days after.

The Yale team reported its findings on conference calls with participants in their study in October and again this week, Berenson noted. “Two people independently told Unreported Truths of the study’s findings.”

The people who told Unreported Truths of the findings included one person who participates in the study and directly heard the reports from the Yale researchers on the conference call. The other person is a scientist who is in contact with multiple members of the Yale team.

“The researchers discussed publishing the findings with at least one major peer-reviewed journal, a person with direct knowledge of those discussions said. The journal declined,” Berenson added.

The Yale scientists plan to publish their findings soon on a unreviewed “pre-print” server so that other researchers and members of the public can see them and discuss their implications.

“They also intend to send samples to an independent lab for validation, though they do not believe they’re mistaken,” Berenson wrote.

Phillip Altman, a Pharmacologist – Clinical Trial and Drug Regulatory Affairs senior industry pharmaceutical consultant in drug research and regulatory approval with more than 40 years experience, noted in a Dec. 19 Substack.com analysis:

“This was ALWAYS a danger from the very beginning when an experimental gene-based product was imposed on the world’s population without the usual proper safety testing. Such gene-based products carry significant safety risks and this is why, up to now, these products were researched and used in only rare genetic disorders and cancers where there was no viable alternative. Many gene-based products have failed safety testing and their long term safety is uncertain. …

“If the results of this Yale University study can be confirmed, it means that potentially billions of people have had their DNA altered, possibly permanently, to produce toxic spike protein indefinitely which may translate into a range of cardiovascular, neurological, immunological and oncogenic effects into the future.

“How can the politicians, health bureaucrats and so-called ‘health experts’ allow this to continue in light of this frightening prospect?

“I predict Big Pharma will endeavor to block publication and discredit this Yale study without providing any evidence to the contrary.”

 

Source: https://www.worldtribune.com/yale-scientists-covid-spike-protein-found-in-blood-of-individuals-two-years-after-they-received-injections/

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Rubbish reports from rubbish sources, most importantly, without any direct comment or substantiation from Professor Iwasaki, the claimed source of these reports, which seems entirely fitting for this new AN sub-forum:

 

Screenshot_1.jpg.9db16a130a1a4028d9cd1eab457e2618.jpg

 

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/vigilant-news-bias/

 

Screenshot_2.jpg.6e631d0027cd66fbb8f7d4f1eae900e8.jpg

 

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/world-tribune/

 

 

Screenshot_3.jpg.87f2e2a74af585f1f046844a47fe3874.jpg

https://www.factcheck.org/person/alex-berenson/

 

and a long list fact check reports on Berenson's past false statements and claims regarding COVID.

 

 

The most recent published comment that I can find from Akiko Iwasaki, who is indeed a prominent and respected researcher, regarding COVID vaccines came last month in November to NBC News, as follows:

 

Do the Covid vaccines provide long-lasting protection?

The CDC is recommending that older adults get a second Covid shot in the spring. How durable are the vaccines?

 

"Despite the CDC recommending an additional shot, there’s no evidence that the mRNA vaccines aren’t working as expected, said Akiko Iwasaki, a professor of immunology at the Yale School of Medicine.Rather, Iwasaki said, there may be something unique to this virus that is preventing people’s bodies from maintaining high levels of immunity." [emphasis added]

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/durable-are-mrna-covid-vaccines-rcna178457

 

And a news search of the subject of this thread finds ZERO recent news reports from any reasonably credible sources reporting any of the claims being made in this thread.

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Fact Check: No evidence for vaccine DNA risk raised by Florida Surgeon General

February 6, 2024

 

"There is no evidence to suggest that residual DNA fragments in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines pose a health risk raised in statements by Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo."

 

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/no-evidence-vaccine-dna-risk-raised-by-florida-surgeon-general-2024-02-05/

 

 

 
Screenshot_4.jpg.1c31b3fff25482353627e73b60641499.jpg
 
 
 
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 12/21/2024 at 8:36 AM, ChaiyaTH said:

The oldies here all took 3-4 booster shots of this crap so they will defend it to be good stuff until there is 100 research showing how bad and useless the shots were. It's like the naked emperor, it was already during covid.

 

Are oldies still alive? Yes or no? That's all that matters 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Yes.

 

Several of my closest friends were conned (or manipulated, or coerced) into accepting the cl0t shots / DNA re-arrangers.

 

This is 100% about profit motive (and p0pulation kontrol) and has nothing whatsoever to do with concern for public health (i.e. the useless eaters' lifespan).

 

No matter what sort of tripe Tall John Guy in BKK flexes.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
On 12/21/2024 at 10:27 AM, gargamon said:

Post as many unreviewed papers as you like. All garbage until the feedback comes back and it's actually published in a reputable journal.

 

reputable? they are all 'bought/captured' and live by expensive reprints for big pharma...

  • Agree 1
Posted
On 12/21/2024 at 8:36 AM, ChaiyaTH said:

The oldies here all took 3-4 booster shots of this crap so they will defend it to be good stuff until there is 100 research showing how bad and useless the shots were.

...and then they will still defend it.  Again - cognitive dissonance.

  • Agree 2
Posted
34 minutes ago, connda said:
On 12/21/2024 at 8:36 AM, ChaiyaTH said:

The oldies here all took 3-4 booster shots of this crap so they will defend it to be good stuff until there is 100 research showing how bad and useless the shots were.

...and then they will still defend it.  Again - cognitive dissonance.

 

Yes, none so blind as those that refuse to see.

 

MarkTwainquoteonfoolingpeople.thumb.jpg.fd4a225612d2bb7afd3b99ac69b412de.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...