Jump to content

Mike Waltz Warns Hostage-Takers: “Bullet in Your Damn Forehead”


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I don’t suppose Shapiro asked Waltz about the consequences of cutting up U.S. citizens with a bone saw?

 

Or would that have got I the way of this deal he has in mind for Saudi Arabia?!

 

   Who are you referring to ?

Who is the American citizen that got cut up with a bone saw and by whom ?

  • Confused 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

 

15 years for taking down a poster....allegedly......and that isn't taking him hostage???.......555

 

   It was indeed a severe punishment .

He got charged with theft and subversion and a hostile act against the state  

But being held hostage means that the holder makes demands for the held peoples release .

   Demands were not made to Ottos release and therefore he wasn't being held hostage  

  • Confused 3
Posted
4 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   It was indeed a severe punishment .

He got charged with theft and subversion and a hostile act against the state  

But being held hostage means that the holder makes demands for the held peoples release .

   Demands were not made to Ottos release and therefore he wasn't being held hostage  

 

So if I take some hostage.......but make no demands.....they are not a hostage?....mmmmm??

 

Demands were made by North Korea to secure Otto Warmbier’s release, though they were largely implicit rather than formally stated. North Korea has a history of using detained foreigners as bargaining chips to extract concessions or demonstrate diplomatic leverage, and Warmbier’s case was no exception.

 

Demands and Diplomatic Context

1. Public Confession and Propaganda Victory

• North Korea demanded that Otto Warmbier confess publicly to his alleged crime of stealing a propaganda poster.

• His confession was broadcast globally, likely serving North Korea’s aim to portray the U.S. as morally corrupt and justify their anti-American policies.

2. Negotiation Leverage

• Warmbier’s detention came at a time of high tensions between the U.S. and North Korea over nuclear weapons programs and sanctions.

• Analysts suggest North Korea may have intended to use him as leverage for future negotiations on sanctions relief or foreign aid.

3. Ransom Allegations

• In 2019, reports emerged that the U.S. government agreed to pay $2 million for Warmbier’s medical expenses as a condition of his release.

• The Trump administration later clarified that no payment was actually made, though the demand highlighted North Korea’s financial motives.

4. Diplomatic Engagement

• The U.S. made several diplomatic overtures to secure Warmbier’s release.

• Sweden, which acts as an intermediary for the U.S. in North Korea, likely played a role in back-channel communications.

 

 

While no official demands were confirmed, North Korea likely viewed Otto Warmbier’s detention as an opportunity for propaganda and bargaining leverage

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

So if I take some hostage.......but make no demands.....they are not a hostage?....mmmmm??

 

 

 

   Otto was being held on crimes of theft . 

He commited a crime and was being held for that crime .

What were the actual demands made by N.K for Ottos rease ?

What did NK ask for ?

   Being jailed for theft and no demands being made for his release, means that he wasnt being held hostage .

   All this effort to change the meanings' of a  word, just to cover up Bidens failings to get the American citizens released from Gaza 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Otto was being held on crimes of theft . 

He commited a crime and was being held for that crime .

What were the actual demands made by N.K for Ottos rease ?

What did NK ask for ?

   Being jailed for theft and no demands being made for his release, means that he wasnt being held hostage .

   All this effort to change the meanings' of a  word, just to cover up Bidens failings to get the American citizens released from Gaza 

 

So you read none of this????

 

 

Demands were made by North Korea to secure Otto Warmbier’s release, though they were largely implicit rather than formally stated. North Korea has a history of using detained foreigners as bargaining chips to extract concessions or demonstrate diplomatic leverage, and Warmbier’s case was no exception.

 

Demands and Diplomatic Context

1. Public Confession and Propaganda Victory

• North Korea demanded that Otto Warmbier confess publicly to his alleged crime of stealing a propaganda poster.

• His confession was broadcast globally, likely serving North Korea’s aim to portray the U.S. as morally corrupt and justify their anti-American policies.

2. Negotiation Leverage

• Warmbier’s detention came at a time of high tensions between the U.S. and North Korea over nuclear weapons programs and sanctions.

• Analysts suggest North Korea may have intended to use him as leverage for future negotiations on sanctions relief or foreign aid.

3. Ransom Allegations

• In 2019, reports emerged that the U.S. government agreed to pay $2 million for Warmbier’s medical expenses as a condition of his release.

• The Trump administration later clarified that no payment was actually made, though the demand highlighted North Korea’s financial motives.

4. Diplomatic Engagement

• The U.S. made several diplomatic overtures to secure Warmbier’s release.

• Sweden, which acts as an intermediary for the U.S. in North Korea, likely played a role in back-channel communications.

 

 

While no official demands were confirmed, North Korea likely viewed Otto Warmbier’s detention as an opportunity for propaganda and bargaining leverage. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

So you read none of this????

 

 

Demands were made by North Korea to secure Otto Warmbier’s release, though they were largely implicit rather than formally stated. North Korea has a history of using detained foreigners as bargaining chips to extract concessions or demonstrate diplomatic leverage, and Warmbier’s case was no exception.

 

Demands and Diplomatic Context

1. Public Confession and Propaganda Victory

• North Korea demanded that Otto Warmbier confess publicly to his alleged crime of stealing a propaganda poster.

• His confession was broadcast globally, likely serving North Korea’s aim to portray the U.S. as morally corrupt and justify their anti-American policies.

2. Negotiation Leverage

• Warmbier’s detention came at a time of high tensions between the U.S. and North Korea over nuclear weapons programs and sanctions.

• Analysts suggest North Korea may have intended to use him as leverage for future negotiations on sanctions relief or foreign aid.

3. Ransom Allegations

• In 2019, reports emerged that the U.S. government agreed to pay $2 million for Warmbier’s medical expenses as a condition of his release.

• The Trump administration later clarified that no payment was actually made, though the demand highlighted North Korea’s financial motives.

4. Diplomatic Engagement

• The U.S. made several diplomatic overtures to secure Warmbier’s release.

• Sweden, which acts as an intermediary for the U.S. in North Korea, likely played a role in back-channel communications.

 

 

While no official demands were confirmed, North Korea likely viewed Otto Warmbier’s detention as an opportunity for propaganda and bargaining leverage. 

 

  Did you write it yourself or did you Copy and paste if from somewhere else ?

   But it didn't actually state what demands N.K made , because N.K didn't make any demands for his release .

  Being asked to pay hospital bills doesn't mean you are being held hostage.

  • Confused 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Social Media said:

Despite his tough rhetoric, Waltz suggested that Hamas might be allowed to continue operating if it releases the American hostages. “Hamas has every exit blocked except one, and that’s to release our hostages if you want to live,” he warned, leaving the door open to conditional survival for the organization

He's also offering other options. Unlike the scum Hamas who actually did execute hostages with a bullet to the head.

Posted
37 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

So you read none of this????

 

 

 

   So you copy and past ten bullet points and expect me to read them all and do some research and investigate the points and reply to those points ?

   It would take me a few hours doing web searches and reading and replying .

   You spend ten seconds copying and pasting and you expect me to spend a few hours replying to your C& P 

  No only that you don't even reply to 1 question that I asked

Posted
1 hour ago, koolkarl said:

Well said Mike.  And while you are at it, ban all muslims from flying so the rest of the non Islamic world isn't

inconvenienced, wasting hours waiting in line, and spending billions annually on security for this group.  I am sick of

it and will only fly if absolutely necessary. 

Agreed, but the disruption and inconvenience we suffer is to some extent of our own making, I mean is it really necessary to search  absolutely everybody for explosives etc including even 80 year old non muslim  grandmothers just to appear "non discriminatory" ?

We all know who the perpetrators of hi jackings are most likely to be , and what exactly is the problem with appearing discriminatory in such matters, the time to worry about hurt feelings has long gone. I see no reason why there should not be a seperate queue even a separate dedicated terminal for muslims,  and not just at airports, They have no one to blame but themselves

  • Agree 2
Posted
14 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

The tide has turned .

Since Bidens Presidency it became acceptable to take USA hostages and keep them .

   Terrorist group will need to think twice before talking USA hostages , bullets in the head will be the response 

Similar to the previous disastrous Democrat POTUS Jimmy Carter - probably the sole reason we have all the problems in the ME today are a result of his weakness that led to the fall of the Shah of Iran and all the S#1t that followed

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 2
Posted

Seems like it is easy to threaten but not easy to do. Sending US troops into Palestine will make them stick out a mile. Targeted missiles are more likely to kill the hostages. Just how is all this to be done?

Posted
23 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

    Otto Warmbier WASNT a hostage .

He was being held on crimes of theft, which he was guilty of .

No demands were made for Ottos release , so he wasn't being held hostage .

   He was being held in jail for the crime he committed 

 

His theft? You think this punishment fits the crime? He was convicted of attempting to steal a propaganda poster from his hotel, for which he was sentenced to 15 years of imprisonment with hard labor. Shortly after his sentencing in March 2016, Warmbier suffered a severe neurological injury from an unknown cause and fell into a coma, which lasted until his death.

Hard labor in N Korea would no doubt  be very hard. Medical and nutrition needs being met? What do you think? You position is absurd

 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Emdog said:

His theft? You think this punishment fits the crime? He was convicted of attempting to steal a propaganda poster from his hotel, for which he was sentenced to 15 years of imprisonment with hard labor. Shortly after his sentencing in March 2016, Warmbier suffered a severe neurological injury from an unknown cause and fell into a coma, which lasted until his death.

Hard labor in N Korea would no doubt  be very hard. Medical and nutrition needs being met? What do you think? You position is absurd

 

 

You're onto a loser here....literally......save yourself some time and effort.....555

Posted
1 hour ago, Emdog said:

His theft? You think this punishment fits the crime? He was convicted of attempting to steal a propaganda poster from his hotel, for which he was sentenced to 15 years of imprisonment with hard labor. Shortly after his sentencing in March 2016, Warmbier suffered a severe neurological injury from an unknown cause and fell into a coma, which lasted until his death.

Hard labor in N Korea would no doubt  be very hard. Medical and nutrition needs being met? What do you think? You position is absurd

 

 

   His sentence for his criminal act of theft is a different matter .

The point was that he was being held for theft , he wasn't being held for no reason and he wasn't being held with demands for his release , which means that he wasn't being held hostage .

   He was jailed for theft 

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Will B Good said:

 

You're onto a loser here....literally......save yourself some time and effort.....555

 

   Stop trolling .

At least he can write his own opinion, rather than just endless copying and pasting and posting other peoples opinion .

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...