I'm thinking "one can logically accept that attachment & craving to anything impermanent will lead to suffering, without the need to practice for ones lifetime."
Then what occurs when one becomes enlightened or awakened?
Wasn't this an entree into "that which was never born"?
Or did the Buddha craft his words to make his teaching appear to include something beyond.
An ambiguity in order to protect himself from offending religious adherents of the time.
And why would one embark on years of dedicated practice and asceticism in order to have actual experience of the folly of attachment & craving?
If ones attachments & craving revolve around wholesome pursuits, what is wrong with craving?
Aren't these attributes, practiced with an element of control and moderation, valuable as they provide the drive towards
pursuits, wholesome or not?
Probably still not enough evidence for some people.
I posted a link before but it got discarded as being "waffle"
I know the facts are real but some folks on here will just move on to something else,never admitting to anything.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now