Deterioration of Dining Quality and Experience
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
Announcements
-
Topics
-
Latest posts...
-
42
Looming Crisis: Private Schools Face Closures Amid VAT Hike
Thats link is a good insight into the financial interplay between private and state education sectors, however, the report misses a lot of nuance and misses the far-reaching implications on educational equity and public finances. 1) Disparity Between Private School Fees and State School Spending: The report notes that in 2022–23, average private school fees were £15,200, nearly 90% higher than state school spending per pupil, which was £8,000. This gap has more than doubled since 2010. Counterargument: While the nominal gap has increased, this comparison doesn't account for differences in services provided. Private schools often offer additional facilities, extracurricular activities, and lower student-to-teacher ratios, which contribute to higher fees. Therefore, a direct financial comparison may not fully capture the value proposition of private education. 2) Stability of Private School Attendance: Despite rising fees, the proportion of pupils attending private schools has remained around 6–7% over the past two decades. Counterargument: The steady percentage may mask underlying socioeconomic factors. Higher-income families might continue to afford private education, while middle-income families are increasingly priced out, potentially leading to greater educational inequality - the report also makes a huge assumption that the demographic for private schools is concentrated at the very top of the income distribution - I'd like to see the facts and real data here as the assumption that this will only impact those who can afford is very flawed IMO but fits perfectly with the governmental bias, in the hope they will receive the support along the lines of 'tax the rich' - the rich won't be impacted, the middle income and lower income demographics will be. 3) Revenue from Removing Tax Exemptions: The IFS estimates that eliminating tax exemptions, such as introducing VAT on private school fees, could generate approximately £1.6 billion annually in additional tax revenue. Counterargument: Implementing VAT on private school fees could lead to unintended consequences, such as increased financial strain on families, potential reductions in private school enrolments, and a subsequent rise in demand for state school places. This shift could offset the anticipated revenue gains due to the need for increased state funding to accommodate additional students. 4) Impact on State School Funding: A projected 3–7% decrease in private school attendance due to fee increases would necessitate an additional £100–300 million per year for state schools to accommodate the influx of students. Counterargument: The actual impact on state schools could be more significant than estimated. An influx of students may strain resources, affect class sizes, and potentially diminish the quality of education. Moreover, regional disparities in state school capacities could lead to uneven effects across the country. 5) Net Public Finance Impact: After accounting for additional state school funding needs, the net gain to public finances from removing tax exemptions is estimated at £1.3–1.5 billion per year, potentially allowing for a 2% increase in state school spending targeted at disadvantaged students. Counterargument: The projected net gain may be overly optimistic. Administrative costs associated with implementing and enforcing new tax policies, potential tax avoidance strategies by private schools or parents, and the economic impact of reduced disposable income for families could diminish the expected financial benefits. But, as highlighted earlier (copy and paste) >> If its one thing we've already learned from this government, its how readily they lie, and how quickly they will sell out the needy << will the labour government really re-invest that £1.6 BN into state schools or spend it elsewhere ? 6) Uncertainty and Potential Risks: The report acknowledges uncertainties, including potential reductions in labour supply and tax avoidance behaviours, which could affect the outcomes of removing tax exemptions. Counterargument: These uncertainties highlight the complexity of the issue. Policymakers should consider comprehensive impact assessments and explore alternative strategies to address educational funding disparities without unintended negative consequences. -
58
Woman Dies After Being Set on Fire in New York Subway
You snooze you loose. Keep your eyes open on the subway.- 1
-
13
Trump’s Opportunity to Redefine U.S.-Qatar Relations
It didn't, neither did your democrats feckless hitler messaging campaign. Ask yourself why democrats can be so moronic to play the hitler card. Thing about democracy, Trump is an American loving patriot who is all about preserving democracy unlike your America hating losing democrat party. The hitler card is one fine campaign strategy, wouldn't you say? LOL...it sure scored points for the feckless simpleton democrats during their pathetic $2B campaign of failures. FYI /context -
116
Insurrectionist Dems seek to Keep Trump from Office.
Not angry in the least, just correcting your false implication you wrote. Your group hates facts and when confront makes empty claims as thats all you have. you're gaslighting with the issue you tried to take out of context of what was written for your distorting agenda. If you cant discuss honestly then I'm done discussing this with you as its circular on your part.- 1
-
11
Where can Thais get help against a scammer?
No, it is definitely not an inside job of government staff and bank staff. -
932
Introduction to Personal Income Tax in Thailand
I agree. When news broke about this tax enforcement, many members questioned how can they "chase" foreigners for tax, all over Thailand? It was so obvious that there was no need for the Thai government to chase any foreigners as they already make the foreigners come to them with 90 day reporting and an annual visa / extension. Soooooooo many post were deleted by the Mods at the time as "scaremongering" but so many members agreed, as I do, that this is the simplest way for the Thai government to collect either legitimate tax, or "tea money" from foreigners. Now, we re allowed to discuss the possibility. I am not sure what changed, but we can discuss it now. As I said some time ago. A tax clearance certificate could go the way like the Certificate of Residence. It is free, but most pay 300 baht for it. Maybe just another Thai government department want their 300 baht off hundreds of thousands of foreigners as another little earner, and, for high net worth individuals, they can invoke the law for a lot more money. We will see early next year how it plays out.- 1
-
96
Windbag at work - again
Windbag 2.0 at work; https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-urges-supreme-court-hit-pause-law-ban-tiktok-us-month-rcna185606 "TikTok and China won 🙂 -
42
Watch: Graphic Inmate's Fatal Beating by NY Officers Sparks Outrage
What was this guy in for? What led up to the incident? Serious question. Google won't tell me so I assume it's serious. Not that it justifies the beating but I would like to know the full story for once unlike the propaganda that was fed to us about the "hero" George Floyd.
-
-
Popular in The Pub
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now