The Pelicot Rape

[Flyguy330]

I'm curious to hear the opinions on this case from the 'sexperts' on this forum.

According to the evidence and admissions made, Mr.Pelicot arranged the rape of his unconscious wife over a 9 year period. Over 70 men were alleged to be involved, and about 50 were tracked down and have been convicted of Mrs.Pelicots rape. I understand that in some instances the 'attacks' were multiple simultaneous rapes by many different men. A gang rape in other words.

My problem is that I really find it hard to believe that a woman could be regularly drugged into unconsciousness over a 9 year period without suspecting something. Furthermore, I think most women can tell when there has been sexual penetration of their body even if it occurred while unconscious - and more so when the penetration was by multiple dicks, and probably in a rough or aggressive manner. Am I wrong in that?

All of this puts serious doubts in my mind as to the truth of this whole story, at least in terms of the womans shock and amazement at being shown the video evidence.

Does anyone else find it strange, indeed unbelievable, that she was in total ignorance of what was going on?

 

[scubascuba3]

Presumably that came up in the trial 

[GinBoy2]

The whole story is past horrific

 

What decent man does that to his wife or partner?

 

The guy is a monster, as well as the guys who participated in the abuse

 

I thought the sentences for  the abusing men were crazy lenient 

 

But at least Pelicot himself will rot and die in prison

[Ben Zioner]

2 hours ago, GinBoy2 said:

The whole story is past horrific

 

What decent man does that to his wife or partner?

 

The guy is a monster, as well as the guys who participated in the abuse

 

I thought the sentences for  the abusing men were crazy lenient 

 

But at least Pelicot himself will rot and die in prison

I disagree only on one point, I reckon that the trial was handled masterly, thanks to Madame Pelicot in the largest part. She is an amazing Lady.

[KannikaP]

3 hours ago, GinBoy2 said:

What decent man does that to his wife or partner?

A decent man doesn't.

 

[xtrnuno41]

The weirdest things can happen.

 

Once had contact with a for me known adult Thai woman.

She married an Aussie and lived in Ozz.

The Ozzie told her, she should have sex with his friends !! Not drugged ! .

I told her to leave that "man".

 

In India girls age 7 and up are sold or kidnapped for having sex in the bigger cities, prostitution !

And the list goes on and on. Endless.

 

In South America, some country,it is normal to learn to have sex and to practice, the guys use donkeys ! No drugs.

[Yagoda]

Hes a scumbag and deserves to get some butt banging payback in prison.

[Will B Good]

15 hours ago, Flyguy330 said:

I'm curious to hear the opinions on this case from the 'sexperts' on this forum.

According to the evidence and admissions made, Mr.Pelicot arranged the rape of his unconscious wife over a 9 year period. Over 70 men were alleged to be involved, and about 50 were tracked down and have been convicted of Mrs.Pelicots rape. I understand that in some instances the 'attacks' were multiple simultaneous rapes by many different men. A gang rape in other words.

My problem is that I really find it hard to believe that a woman could be regularly drugged into unconsciousness over a 9 year period without suspecting something. Furthermore, I think most women can tell when there has been sexual penetration of their body even if it occurred while unconscious - and more so when the penetration was by multiple dicks, and probably in a rough or aggressive manner. Am I wrong in that?

All of this puts serious doubts in my mind as to the truth of this whole story, at least in terms of the womans shock and amazement at being shown the video evidence.

Does anyone else find it strange, indeed unbelievable, that she was in total ignorance of what was going on?

 

 

 

I think if some of them can prove they only used their fingers they shouldn't really be prosecuted.

[Flyguy330]

38 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Hes a scumbag and deserves to get some butt banging payback in prison.

Totally agree there, he has been implicated in at least one other premeditated rape, and a murder.

But I really wonder about her story of total innocence and ignorance. I know lots of couples get their kicks in various kinky ways. Lots of guys get off on seeing their wife shagged by strangers.

Some women seem to like rape fantasies, maybe with an element of 'unconsciousness' added to spice it up more. One only has to look at the spectrum of bizarre porn out there to understand there are people into all sorts of weird stuff. Including extreme bondage and sadism. Personally I don't see the attraction of things like 'foot fetishes', which is mild on that scale, but obviously there's a market for all of this - meaning, it is wanted by some, and seemingly indulged in enthusiastically.

I'm curious about the Pelicots background story. Since he's a man who liked such 'games' I doubt he'd pair off with a little innocent woman, which is how she's been portrayed. Is it not possible she too was an enthusiastic participant - right up to the point where she was implicated too in some criminal case against her husband?

[John49]

19 hours ago, Flyguy330 said:

Does anyone else find it strange, indeed unbelievable, that she was in total ignorance of what was going on?

 

 When she woke up in the morning, her genitalia must have sticky and congealed, or otherwise leaking lubricant.

I have read the French don’t like to use condoms, I guess sticky and congealed applies. More so, if multiple participants.

Possibly, her husband cleaned her up.

She should have been sore too, unless she lubricated subconsciously.

Was this raw topic brought up and explained away at trial?

 

When she woke up in the morning after being sedated for 12 hours, she surely had some sense of being drugged. I sometime take a mild sleeping tablet, and the sleepy effects continue on waking up for a few hours thereafter.

Possibly, there are medical grade drugs that eliminate such consequences. On top of this, would there not some sort of addiction such that she cannot now sleep without similar medication.

I wonder if she continues with some sort of strong sleep medication, now medically prescribed to cover this condition.

Was this topic brought up and explained away at trial?

 

Last, and least, how did a women of her age (72), manage to go for 12 hours without a pee?