Jump to content

Is There Enough Evidence to Indict Joe Biden?


Is there enough Evidence to Indict Joe Biden?  

64 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

The evidence is the money that flowed from bad actors linked to the CCP, the Russian establishment, Romania, Ukraine etc. To this day not a single democrat supporter has been able to explain it. Only to get discussion shut down, and make nonsensical statements such as the Big Guy is Hunters dope dealer.

Can you clear up now what services the bidens were providing in those countries to earn all those millions that you and the rest of the forum left so frantically and falsely denied were ever paid?

 

Of course not😅 more censorship please quick quick😂

Censorship from the republican congressional probe you mean?

  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
13 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

If they chose not to prosecute before, then they likely will not now.  He's only become more unfirm as time has gone on.

 

It's only a shame that Trump was charged and not Biden, giving idiots the opportunity to say "Trump the criminal", when they know full well that Biden should also bear that moniker.

 

34 times convicted felon. Weird. Bingley. Fascist. Nazi. Hitler. Oh ya remember the golden showers.. Russian collusion. Deplorable. The best Biden I've ever seen. Laptop denier. Bug guy. Pardon. 

  • Confused 3
  • Thanks 2
Posted
7 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

If they chose not to prosecute before, then they likely will not now.  He's only become more unfirm as time has gone on.

 

It's only a shame that Trump was charged and not Biden, giving idiots the opportunity to say "Trump the criminal", when they know full well that Biden should also bear that moniker.

They "chose" not to prosecute before because you can't prosecute a sitting president.  First, you have to impeach him.  Which the Dems wouldn't vote for under any circumstances. 

 

After he's no longer the sitting president (and Kamala is no longer in the wings...) it may get good.

 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
9 hours ago, riclag said:

No such thing as Vp Musk or Potus Musk ,your msnbc Cnn bbc guardian is showing,he’s not natural citizen!

This is a made up term to deliberately  delegitimize his efforts at helping 

Trump weed out waste, fraud and needless spending by a government run by unelected bureaucrats!

 

 

You got that right.  Better to have government leaders and advisors who already made their money, than government leaders and advisors who have little to start with, and use their power to enrich themselves at taxpayer expense.

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Isaan sailor said:

You got that right.  Better to have government leaders and advisors who already made their money, than government leaders and advisors who have little to start with, and use their power to enrich themselves at taxpayer expense.

Right, unlike government leaders like Trump, who treated the Emoluments Clause as a suggestion and turned public office into his own VIP rewards program?

  • Confused 3
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
6 hours ago, thesetat said:

I would tend to agree with this. Usually, worgeordie has some good comments. But in this case I think he has been watching too many leftists news outlets that are trying to undermine the legitimacy of Trumps selections for his aides. There is nothing Muisk can do without Trumps approval. So to say he is acting like the PREZ or VP is ludicrous. Trump would never allow that to happen anyway. He is power hungry and craves to be #1 in office. I do believe Trump listens to Musks' advice and even acts on some of it. But that is the extent of Musks' influence. 

Generally speaking ,money talks & S - walks! The left has their high rollers that they listen to,Soros, Gates, Bezos.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 12/31/2024 at 11:49 AM, KhunLA said:

Yes, by why bother, as by the time the appeals process is over, he'll be lucky to remember who he is.   

 

Leave the poor guy alone, as has enough to deal with when he reflects on his life, and realizes what a failure he has been, and all the lives he probably ruined being a politician, if not directly resulting in some of their deaths.

 

Agree.

Leave him alone to his tomatoes...

 

 

  • Sad 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...