Jump to content

Elon Musk Advocates for Tommy Robinson’s Release Amid Criticism of UK Leadership


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

but much worse cases involving child rapists getting suspended sentences if they are from the "correct" Demographic. 

Are you not allowed to say which demographic?

Can you give an example where someone raped a child and was not jailed?

Posted
39 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Again Jonny, absolutely nothing to do with your transgender fixation 

 

Again Chomper, deflecting and dodging the question.

 

Why do you support self identification in some cases but refuse to in others.

 

It's a simple question. Just answer it.  

  • Like 2
  • Confused 3
Posted
6 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

Is there only one case, you used plural?

 

 

That the best you got? 😆

 

You asked for an example, I provided one.

 

There are many cases but I will not waste my day googling for you, I am not your PA. I suggest you do your own research,  you might learn something and revise your opinion. Then again...

  • Sad 1
  • Love It 2
Posted
Just now, JonnyF said:

 

That the best you got? 😆

 

You asked for an example, I provided one.

 

There are many cases but I will not waste my day googling for you, I am not your PA. I suggest you do your own research,  you might learn something and revise your opinion. Then again...

I believe you are giving false information. You said

Quote

much worse cases involving child rapists getting suspended sentences if they are from the "correct" Demographic. 

 

You missed out some important information in the ONE case you provided, perhaps deliberately. 

The sex was consensual and the judge gave reasons for not jailing the male student. 

 

If you could give the other cases, I'd appreciate it. I've searched myself but can't find any. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

The sex was consensual and the judge gave reasons for not jailing the male student.

 

Having sex with a minor is statutory rape.

 

Please let's not go down the route of defending this. I'll need a shower...

  • Like 1
  • Confused 4
  • Agree 1
Posted

I am not Yaxley-Lennon's biggest fan, in fact I think he is a mindless thug/chav in many ways...

 

However, he is practicing his right to free speech and I do agree with the cause he is fighting for, I just wish that the far-right in the UK could find a stable, educated and coherent leader instead of some scallywag from Luton.

 

Someone like Enoch Powell would be perfect. If Jacob Rees-Mogg eventually defects to Reform UK once he sees the writing is on the wall for the Conservatives, then I think that could be a massive boon for them and will quite possible get them over the line at the next general election.

Posted
2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Having sex with a minor is statutory rape.

 

Please let's not go down the route of defending this. I'll need a shower...

I'm not defending this, I'm stating the facts. Still waiting for the other cases of other rapists not being jailed for rape due to their 'certain demographic'. I suspect you didn't say Muslim for a reason.

Posted
22 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Why do you support self identification in some cases but refuse to in others.

 

It's a simple question. Just answer it.  

There's a big difference between someone using an innocuous pseudonym and a man pretending that he's a woman, or vice versa.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

It's not even a case of child rape.

He was spreading false information , inferring that many Muslims are not jailed for raping children because of the fact that they are Muslim. Total racist nonsense. The ONE case he could find involved two teenagers having consensual sex. 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, JonnyF said:
18 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

The sex was consensual and the judge gave reasons for not jailing the male student.

 

Having sex with a minor is statutory rape.

How old was the teenager in that case, was she below the age of consent?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

He was spreading false information , inferring that many Muslims are not jailed for raping children because of the fact that they are Muslim. Total racist nonsense. The ONE case he could find involved two teenagers having consensual sex. 

I know, I was not disagreeing with you.

Posted
1 minute ago, Liverpool Lou said:

How old was the teenager in that case, was she below the age of consent?

 

Trying to justify and defend statutory rape is not really a good look Lou. 

  • Confused 2
  • Agree 2
Posted
23 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

I agree, but that is not something that I have done, I have just asked you a question about a case that you are making assertions about and that you will not answer.  That is not a good look, Jonny.

I asked him a question too that he is avoiding, after inferring many Muslims were raping children and not being jailed for it, just because of their religion. He can't support this absurd accusation with links. Spreading religious hate is not a good look. 

I like Tommy Robinson and think there are far too many Muslims being allowed into the UK and they shouldn't change our laws, but to be fair they are not and shouldn't be lied about. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Neeranam said:

I asked him a question too that he is avoiding, after inferring many Muslims were raping children and not being jailed for it, just because of their religion. He can't support this absurd accusation with links. Spreading religious is not a good look. 

I'd like to give you a "Thumbs up" or a "+1" but for some reason the emoji facility does not appear on your posts for me.

  • Agree 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Trying to justify and defend statutory rape is not really a good look Lou. 

Unfortunately as widely reported many girls faced rape and exploitation with the perpetrators never being charged as in the Rochdale cases and others.

 

A victim of a Rochdale grooming gang has said she was raped more than 100 times from the age of 12 and felt "let down" by police.

Ruby also told BBC Newsnight police took her aborted foetus away for DNA testing without telling her.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-manchester-68300484

  • Sad 2
  • Agree 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...