Russian Tourist Stabbed After Joke Misunderstood in Pattaya
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
72
-
5
Focus On: Hua Hin, Cha-Am, and Prachuap Khiri Khan: A Coastal Getaway
The placed mentioned are really nice places. But now I have heard that an International airport has been planned in Hua Hin!? I am afraid that will ruin the whole area in no time. My opinion anyway...look at Phuket....😫 -
880
Thai tax tangle: Expats warned of new rules on overseas income
Cyclist .. I examined PID.90 and PID.91 (year 2023 English language version and also the Thai language 2024 version). They do not support what you posted. Details: I do not know what tax form you are referring to. If one looks at PID.91 (2023) tax computation: A.(1) is Salaries, wages pensions (plus exempted income from B.5). A.(2) is Less exempted income (from B.6) B.5 ? That is Severance Pay under Labour Law. B.6? That is the total of B.1 to B.5 to be filled in A.2 (ie Private fund contribution + Government Pension fund contribution + Private teacher aid fund contribution + Income exemption (limited to ONLY "disabled taxpayer under age-65" and "taxpayer aged 65 years or older (including diabled taxpayer), + Severance pay under labour law. If one then looks at Allowance(s) and Exemption(s) after Deduction of Expense(s) Attachment No where is there ANY location for DTA exempt income, nor for por-161/162 exempt income, nor for LTR exempt income. = = = So instead ... if one looks at PID.90 (2023): No.1 (1) Section 40 (1) : Salary, wage, pension etc (included exempted income from 2.(4)) No.1 (2) does not address anything to do with Por-161/162 nor DTA exemptions. It only includes (1)Provident fund contributions, (2) Government Pension Fund contributions, (3) Private teacher aid fund contributions, and (4) Serverance Pay under Labour law. The "No.2" is where Assessable income under section 40(3) is ADDED and NOT subtracted. There is no No.2(4) that is 'obvious' unless one refers to "Allowances and Exemptions after Deduction of Expensives Attachment" where "4" is "Parential care". Further if one examines "Allowances and Exemptions after Deduction of Expensives Attachment" there is NO place for Por-161/162 nor DTA exemptions, nor LTR exempt income. The sum of this goes to 11(2). Conclusion: I caution any one reading this thread, who has exempt income under Por-161/162 or a DTA , or an LTR visa, to be very skeptical as to what Cyclist posted. Study the forms yourself and draw your own conclusion. My conclusion? There is NO place for Por-161/162 nor DTA exemptions, nor LTR exempt income. If one tries to force those exemptions in any exemption field in PID-90 or PID-91 , they could be denied as exemptions (as they are in the wrong field being 'forced' into such by you) and hence you risk paying Thai tax on income that is supposed to be 100% exempt taxation. -
72
-
27
-
35
Joint account
But if it is a Joint account, can she only lay claim to half of it. YOUR 800k stays until Mr Probate says that she can have it. I am only trying to get my ducks in a row for when the Grim One comes for me.
-
-
Popular in The Pub
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now