Trump Urges NATO Allies to Dramatically Boost Defense Spending to 5%

[Social Media]

 

Incoming U.S. President Donald Trump has proposed a significant increase in defense spending for NATO allies, calling for member nations to allocate 5 percent of their GDP to defense. This figure more than doubles the alliance's current 2 percent target and is expected to spark debate among Europe's financially constrained governments.

 

"Europe is in for a tiny fraction of the money that we're in," Trump remarked during a recent appearance at Mar-a-Lago. "We have a thing called the ocean in between us, right? Why are we in for billions and billions of dollars more money than Europe?"

 

Currently, no NATO member meets the proposed 5 percent benchmark. In 2023, the United States allocated 3.4 percent of its GDP to defense, while Poland came closest among allies at 4.7 percent. Other nations, including Germany, France, and the United Kingdom, are still grappling with how to meet even the existing 2 percent target. Germany is working toward meeting the goal this year, while France's defense budget plans face political uncertainties, and the U.K. has yet to establish a firm timeline for achieving its own 2.5 percent target.

 

Smaller nations are also facing challenges. The Czech Republic recently announced it would reach the 2 percent threshold for the first time, and Norway has just surpassed it at 2.1 percent. Larger European nations, such as Italy and Spain, remain well below the mark.  

 

Ralf Stegner, a foreign policy expert with Germany's ruling Social Democrats, called Trump's 5 percent proposal "complete madness," emphasizing that such a dramatic increase would require parliamentary approval.  

 

While the U.S. does not spend the largest percentage of its GDP among NATO members, the size of its economy means it shoulders a disproportionate share of the alliance's financial burden. In 2023, Washington covered 68 percent of NATO's total spending—amounting to $916 billion—while European members collectively contributed just 28 percent, according to data from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.  

 

Amid these disparities, there is growing agreement among NATO members that the current 2 percent spending target is insufficient to meet the alliance's military capability requirements and to address the security threats posed by Russia. A revised target is expected to be discussed at a NATO leaders' summit in The Hague this June.  

 

Mark Rutte, NATO's new Secretary-General, recently called for "a shift to a wartime mindset" in national defense planning but stated it was too early to finalize a new spending target. Similarly, Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre urged caution, stating, "I'm not coming in and committing in a statement to a figure ... that's a serious thing you have to plan and commit to in your budget planning."  

 

Trump's call for a 5 percent target sets the stage for intense negotiations among NATO members as they navigate the balance between shared security responsibilities and their individual economic constraints.

 

Based on a report by Politico 2024-01-09

 

 

[thaibeachlovers]

4 minutes ago, Social Media said:

Incoming U.S. President Donald Trump has proposed a significant increase in defense spending for NATO allies, calling for member nations to allocate 5 percent of their GDP to defense. This figure more than doubles the alliance's current 2 percent target and is expected to spark debate among Europe's financially constrained governments.

He's right and that is a minimum amount.

 

Europe's financially constrained governments.

BS. They have plenty to spend on weapons to Ukraine, and giving illegal immigrants freebies.

 

[daveAustin]

3 hours ago, Social Media said:

Other nations, including Germany, France, and the United Kingdom, are still grappling with how to meet even the existing 2 percent target

Don’t lump in the UK. It might struggle but consistently spends more than the EU players, looking to 2.5%. Germany and France on the other hand have been taking the Michael for years. Most are hoiking contributions since Ukraine war but 5% is a joke. He’s either trying to shake it all up or trounce nato altogether, but the US gains a huge advantage from Europe and others from being part of nato, militarily and economically. He forgets all that. 

[bendejo]

Sounds like the defense industry (not necessarily US companies) contributed generously to the 2025 inauguration fund. 

 

[Hamus Yaigh]

Whilst at the same time threatening to invade NATO countries like Denmark.

[Eric Loh]

USA is spending too much on military. More than 4 times China and 8 times Russia. Biden shrank the US military budget. Trump with his imperlistic ambition will increase military spending. Less for the people. 

[Bkk Brian]

16 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

USA is spending too much on military. More than 4 times China and 8 times Russia. Biden shrank the US military budget. Trump with his imperlistic ambition will increase military spending. Less for the people. 

Didn't Russia just hike theirs up to 25% of GDP? By far the highest.

[Hakuna Matata]

555

 

Quote

“Toto, I've a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore.” 

 

[Eric Loh]

5 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Didn't Russia just hike theirs up to 25% of GDP? By far the highest.

Russia $145 billion vs USA $916 (2023).

[Hakuna Matata]

8 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

He's right and that is a minimum amount.

 

Europe's financially constrained governments.

BS. They have plenty to spend on weapons to Ukraine, and giving illegal immigrants freebies.

 

 

Absolutely!

 

“Toto, I've a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore.”

[Bkk Brian]

5 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Russia $145 billion vs USA $916 (2023).

lol we know that but its done via GDP and like I said Russia is now 25% far above the US

[Eric Loh]

Just now, Bkk Brian said:

lol we know that but its done via GDP and like I said Russia is now 25% far above the US

And you absolutely right. Bottomline the amount is what I was referring to. Notice I didn't mention % to GDP. Maybe you try to deflect. 

[Patong2021]

33 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

USA is spending too much on military. More than 4 times China and 8 times Russia. Biden shrank the US military budget. Trump with his imperlistic ambition will increase military spending. Less for the people. 

Not exactly The Biden administration had a 1% budget increase in the military budget.

The cost constraints were the result of a bipartisan effort to control spending increases that increased the federal deficit because of the previous Trump tax reductions for the wealthy.

The Department of Energy nuclear energy budget took one of the largest reductions as part of the defense cost controls.  Conventional military was relatively  untouched.

 

[Bkk Brian]

Just now, Eric Loh said:

And you absolutely right. Bottomline the amount is what I was referring to. Notice I didn't mention % to GDP. Maybe you try to deflect. 

I know you were referring to total amount, however this whole topic is about percentages of a countries GDP.

[Hummin]

8 hours ago, Social Media said:

"Europe is in for a tiny fraction of the money that we're in," Trump remarked during a recent appearance at Mar-a-Lago. "We have a thing called the ocean in between us, right? Why are we in for billions and billions of dollars more money than Europe?"

 

 

 

 

Well done to make all his voters happy by lying and lying his place where the sun never shines. 

 

First ask yourself why do we have the largest economic in the world, and the answer is simple, because you made great deals with your allies. Then you F pay for own security and securing your business partners. It is not our fault your profitters do not pay America back, and let the stock holders rip you off in every F little deal made, and give zero bach to you guys who sweeping the floors for nothing 

[candide]

Where does he get this 5% number from?

Oh, I know.... 😆

[Nick Carter icp]

2 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

Russia $145 billion vs USA $916 (2023).

 

   Increasing USA spending by 5 % will take their total to over 1000 Dollars.

[SiSePuede419]

Makes sense.

 

NATO is going to need a lot of bombers, tanks and drones to bomb the <deleted> out of Trump's stormtroopers when they invade Denmark-Greenland. 👍

[FritsSikkink]

 

War monger or people need to support the USA "defense" industry?

[AndreasHG]

 

Si vis pacem, para bellum. It was true 2000 years ago, and it is true also today.

 

[thaibeachlovers]

14 hours ago, Hummin said:

Well done to make all his voters happy by lying and lying his place where the sun never shines. 

 

First ask yourself why do we have the largest economic in the world, and the answer is simple, because you made great deals with your allies. Then you F pay for own security and securing your business partners. It is not our fault your profitters do not pay America back, and let the stock holders rip you off in every F little deal made, and give zero bach to you guys who sweeping the floors for nothing 

You do understand that the US is a capitalist country, don't you? If you want a more socialist country you will need to change the government to those that support socialism.

 

Anyway, it's not as though socialist countries are any better, in reality- huge inequality.