Jump to content

Photographer arrested for obscene content on OnlyFans, earns over 2 million baht


Recommended Posts

Posted

The challenge is tht so many girls want to be famous and make money with their bodies as either Pretties, bar girls or models that they will do anything.

 

Personally I think if a person wants t do a page to make money then it is a good thing.  let them do it as long as they are respetful and don't film outside in the parks or public beaches.

 

Thai governemtn can not tax this so they want to outlaw it.  This is too bad but again we hae to treat the people of Thailand like little children and protect them as such.  

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, kingstonkid said:

Thai governemtn can not tax this so they want to outlaw it

Really. Laughable I think🤗. That's not the reason. RTP is just exercise the present law.

Posted
13 minutes ago, kingstonkid said:

treat the people of Thailand like little children

And you feel like a superior because you don't understand Thai culture and attitudes.😵‍💫

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
6 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

It has to be the ultimate hypocrisy that Thailand penalises pornography while it has a massive P4P industry.

Thailand does seem to work in reverse sometimes.

Posted
6 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

It has to be the ultimate hypocrisy that Thailand penalises pornography while it has a massive P4P industry.

After being in Thailand for a few months, I had wondered if the anti-porn, sex toy laws/regulations were not to protect P2P.

  • Agree 1
Posted

Thailand is leading OF maybe just tailing after US and Poland. 

If Prague is world capitol of p0rn, than TH is the leader of webcam performers. 

Good they make hefty sums of money

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, NativeBob said:

Thailand is leading OF maybe just tailing after US and Poland. 

If Prague is world capitol of p0rn, than TH is the leader of webcam performers. 

Good they make hefty sums of money

 

   Where did you get that info from , about Thais being the leader of webcam performers ?

Posted

Doesn't it read like he has duped the girls with god knows what promises and rather than our perceived idea of only fans income going to models he is pocketing the money or am I miss reading?

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, kingstonkid said:

The challenge is tht so many girls want to be famous and make money with their bodies as either Pretties, bar girls or models that they will do anything.

 

Personally I think if a person wants t do a page to make money then it is a good thing.  let them do it as long as they are respetful and don't film outside in the parks or public beaches.

 

Thai governemtn can not tax this so they want to outlaw it.  This is too bad but again we hae to treat the people of Thailand like little children and protect them as such.  

 

 

More money and no STD from only fans. So better for girls then bar work. Of course men want them at bars instead.

  • Agree 1
Posted

Holy gee. Just look at the amounts of money mentioned in the original post. Sex really DOES sell 🙂 And, in this case, it is not even necessarily sex itself, but X and R rated stuff 🙂

Posted
11 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

It has to be the ultimate hypocrisy that Thailand penalises pornography while it has a massive P4P industry.

Yeah, I made the same comment in another thread.

I wonder if it's because the authorities are not getting revenue from this online stuff. 

 

Posted
12 hours ago, webfact said:

distributing obscene images and videos of models on the subscription platform OnlyFans

 

12 hours ago, webfact said:

The accused was charged under Section 287 of the Criminal Code, which penalises those who produce, distribute, or display obscene materials.

"INDECENCY ON THE INTERNET AS A CHALLENGE TO THAI LAW," by Alexander Shytov

https://www.thailawforum.com/articles/indecency-challenge-thailaw.html

  • "According to Section 287 of Thai Penal Code “Whoever (1) for the purpose of trade of trade or by trade, for public distribution or exhibition"
  • "carries on trade, or takes part or participates in the trade concerning the aforesaid obscene material or thing, distributes or exhibits to the public" (my bold emphasis)

Whereas "OnlyFans is the 18 + subscription platform (for a fee) empowering creators to own their full potential, monetize their content, and develop authentic connections with their fans (Only Fans, get it?)."

13 hours ago, webfact said:

apprehended by the Metropolitan Investigation Bureau for distributing obscene images and videos of models on the subscription platform OnlyFans

How is the public damaged by a private subscription only platform? It isn't in the subject case.

13 hours ago, webfact said:

The arrest followed a complaint from a model, who alleged that the photographer had coerced her into participating and later discovered her images online.

 

That's a civil case. Police are to enforce criminal laws following the Penal Code. Allegation is irrelevant to law enforcement and arrest. Was the model held against her permission, raped, threatened with violence, etc. that are aspects of criminal acts? No evidence or allegations were produced.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...