Democracy has failed the US,maybe it's time for a King

[SiSePuede419]

Democracy has failed the US.  It began to get captured by lobbyists in the late 70s.  Then in the 80s all the crazy people were set free from mental hospitals with no mental health monitoring or treatment. That's when you started seeing homeless people on the streets. Also in the 80s, the rich people who ran universities decided to make tuition unaffordable for the middle class.  They saw the inside corporate plans to outsource factory jobs to Asia and automation from robots so they knew there would be fewer jobs in the future in America so they wanted to make it more difficult to compete with their upper middle class Biff and Muffy.

Housing was pretty reasonable priced until late 90s.  That's when the corporate greed exploded in real estate and increasing profit every year became their god they worshipped and they started creating derivative securities based on total bull<deleted>.

All the while they figured out how to make themselves richer while middle class people got poorer.

Like eliminating the rule preventing corporations from buying back their own stock and using the money to reinvest in their factories. 

 

That's when they decided to outsource and pay themselves huge "dividends". 

 

Basically sucking the blood of middle class Americans like capitalist vampires.

 

Democracy failed us because it let our infrastructure degrade because all the money went to tax cuts for rich people.

 

Democracy failed us because it let the prices for real estate escalate far beyond wage increases to become unaffordable.

 

Maybe it's time to try a Dictator...?

 

In a week, it's the Find Out phase.

 

Will the slim majority of American voters (<2%) "find out" that they voted for a liar?  That's he's not really going to be a dictator on Day 1.  Not then, not never.

 

Mexico was never going to pay for the wall.  He knew it.  He just said it to make the "mark" (the gullible victim) feel good.  That's all that matters to the victims as they get addicted to "feeling good" every time their hero says something disgusting or tells some crazy lie like the governor of California signed a law preventing LA from getting enough water --there is no such thing he just told a lie because that's what Fascists do.

 

Don't worry.

 

Dotard Day One Dick Tater Donnie is a total loudmouth lying <deleted> he's good at making rambling speeches at his hate rallies but actually running government efficiently?

 

"Administrative chaos" 

 

Running the federal government is hard work and the Dotard just wants to play golf bang porn stars and disco dance to the gayest song ever by the Village People that he plays all the time.

 

And there's significant uhhh "challenges" for him to uhhh "overcome" to become as successful as Hitler was at destroying Germany's democracy within only 2 months.

 

His Billionaire buddies like Elmo & Rama Dama Ding Dong need tax cuts.

 

When you give money to poor people it makes them dependent and lazy.

 

But when you give money to Rich people it makes them bold and independent and entrepreneur and stuff. 🤑

 

ChatGPT says slow your roll, homie.

 

The historical context of Adolf Hitler's rise to power in Germany and the legal mechanisms he used to consolidate authority are unique to the Weimar Republic's fragile political system. In the United States, there are significant differences in constitutional structure, legal safeguards, and political culture that make such a rapid and total consolidation of power far more difficult. Here's why:

 

1. Constitutional Framework

The U.S. Constitution provides a strong system of checks and balances between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches.

Even with majority support in Congress, U.S. presidents do not have the same level of control over legislation and state powers as Hitler gained under the Enabling Act.

 

2. Federalism

Power is divided between the federal government and the states, making it harder for

a single

Adolf Hitler's rise to dictatorship in Germany was enabled by a combination of factors that made it uniquely possible under the Weimar Constitution and the socio-political conditions of 1933. His consolidation of power involved legal maneuvers like the Reichstag Fire Decree and the Enabling Act, which effectively dismantled checks and balances and gave him dictatorial powers.

In the United States, the situation is vastly different due to its strong constitutional framework, established separation of powers, and a long history of democratic norms. Here are some key points to consider:

Why It’s More Difficult in the U.S.

1. Checks and Balances: The U.S. Constitution divides power between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, making it harder for any single individual to consolidate power.

2. Federalism: Power is distributed across federal, state, and local governments, which creates additional barriers to authoritarian control.

3. Legal Protections: The U.S. has robust legal protections for civil liberties, and changes to these require navigating complex legislative or judicial processes.

4. Military and Law Enforcement: The U.S. military and law enforcement agencies are designed to serve the Constitution, not individual leaders, reducing the risk of them being co-opted for political purposes.

Could Trump Attempt It?

Donald Trump, like any political leader, could theoretically attempt to consolidate power. However, such a move would likely face significant resistance from:

Congress: Even a partisan Congress would be unlikely to fully abdicate its power, as doing so would undermine its members' authority.

The Judiciary: Federal courts, including the Supreme Court, serve as a bulwark against executive overreach.

The Media and Public: A free press and active civil society provide additional barriers to authoritarianism.

Personality Factors

While Trump has shown an interest in pushing the boundaries of executive power, his approach has often been characterized by legal challenges, administrative chaos, and reliance on loyalists rather than systematic restructuring of institutions. This contrasts sharply with Hitler's methodical and strategic approach to dismantling the Weimar Republic's democratic structures.

Conclusion

While Trump could attempt to undermine democratic norms, the structure of the U.S. government, combined with his historical tendencies toward disorganization, makes it highly unlikely that he could replicate Hitler's rapid consolidation of power. However, the erosion of democratic norms over time is always a concern, and vigilance is key to preserving institutional integrity.

 

[mdr224]

Hopefully its someone smart enough whose done well for themselves like Musk and not a loser like the posters on this forum.

[SiSePuede419]

1 minute ago, mdr224 said:

not a loser like the posters on this forum.

Please advise when you became a Billionaire?

 

Because if not, you don't exist to the people you worship. 🤣

[Stocky]

King! No, with Canada, Panama and Greenland in their sights they need an Emperor!

 

[Patong2021]

US will have  something similar: A dictator. The people have spoken.

[impulse]

11 minutes ago, SiSePuede419 said:

Please advise when you became a Billionaire?

 

Because if not, you don't exist to the people you worship.

 

We sure don't matter to the Dem elite, who decide to keep RFK Jr off the primary ballot, tried to keep Trump off all ballots, then decided to swap out the candidate with 14 million primary votes in favor of a candidate with zero primary votes.

 

Democracy isn't the problem.  Democrats are.

 

[Yagoda]

The USA is a republic. Its going along just fine. Best in the world. Sucks to be you if you arent an American.

 

 

[theshu25]

4 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

The USA is a republic. Its going along just fine. Best in the world. Sucks to be you if you arent an American.

 

 

That  is your opinion,which really counts for very very little here.

[Will B Good]

49 minutes ago, mdr224 said:

Hopefully its someone smart enough whose done well for themselves like Musk and not a loser like the posters on this forum.

 

 

I take it you won't be having a stab it then?

[Will B Good]

11 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

The USA is a republic. Its going along just fine. Best in the world. Sucks to be you if you arent an American.

 

 

 

 

Count my blessings everyday that no one ever confuses me with being an American

[JAS21]

23 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

The USA is a republic. Its going along just fine. Best in the world. Sucks to be you if you arent an American.

 

 

Donald of Orange sounds good …

[Yagoda]

Just now, JAS21 said:

Donald of Orange sounds good …

To whom? Some jealous Euros? Some Loser democrats? Socialists?

[Yagoda]

20 minutes ago, theshu25 said:

That  is your opinion,which really counts for very very little here.

Like I care, although I will say that your country will never tell me what to do, while we are your Governments master. So my opinion counts more than yours.

13 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

Count my blessings everyday that no one ever confuses me with being an American

Poor thing, I feel for you, however at least you worship Donald Trump as evidenced by your avatar./

[Will B Good]

Just now, Yagoda said:

Like I care, although I will say that your country will never tell me what to do, while we are your Governments master. So my opinion counts more than yours.

Poor thing, I feel for you, however at least you worship Donald Trump as evidenced by your avatar./

 

 

5555....hardly.....if you look closely it is "Tiny Donnie" ....someone has lifted him up on a chair to sit with the grownups.

[Yagoda]

3 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

5555....hardly.....if you look closely it is "Tiny Donnie" ....someone has lifted him up on a chair to sit with the grownups.

If you have to explain things, its just spin.

 

If you didnt admire him, you wouldnt use his picture to represent yourself. Res Ipsa Loquitur.

 

 

[OneMoreFarang]

1 hour ago, SiSePuede419 said:

Democracy has failed the US.

Not really.

Lot of idiots voted for an idiot.

And when a majority do that, then this is democracy.

I think they deserve what they voted for.

 

The problem is we, the rest of the world. We don't want that idiot to "rule the world". 

[Will B Good]

5 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

If you have to explain things, its just spin.

 

If you didnt admire him, you wouldnt use his picture to represent yourself. Res Ipsa Loquitur.

 

 

 

Tentatus sum te renuntiare pro usu Latini.

[mdr224]

Replies in this thread prove my point. You are the common folk whose opinions dont matter, thinking your ideas are better than Musk. Thats why youre here and hes there

[Yagoda]

7 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

Tentatus sum te renuntiare pro usu Latini.

Gaudeo te censorium non esse!

 

Unlike your ilk.

[Yagoda]

14 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Not really.

Lot of idiots voted for an idiot.

And when a majority do that, then this is democracy.

I think they deserve what they voted for.

 

The problem is we, the rest of the world. We don't want that idiot to "rule the world". 

We dont care. Just do what you are told.

 

I hear that Denmark wants to meet with us LOL.

[GammaGlobulin]

1 hour ago, SiSePuede419 said:

Democracy has failed the US.  It began to get captured by lobbyists in the late 70s. 

 

You are 100-percent correct, of course.

 

Nothing lasts forever, of course.

 

So the question is:  Is the mood of the country turning towards Revolution?  Not yet.

 

What we need is another Great Depression, and then a Re-Start, maybe.

 

What we see now in the USA cannot last forever, nor should it.

 

If you recall, many of the Sociology textbooks during the late 60s and early 70s which were being read by undergrads at that time dealt heavily with social inequality, and wealth disparity...probably much more so than the reading material used today.

 

And, if you recall those times, there were plenty of student protests, many protesting the Vietnam War, which scared the pants off the powers that be.

 

However, it has been said that after those in power witnessed the solidarity and push-back from students at the time, they made it impossible for this type of rebellion to happen again. They did this through piling on student debt, as one example. Students were then forced to work in order to scrape by, and were compelled to work multiple jobs post-graduation, just to pay back these never-ending college debts.

 

Which meant there was much less time for thinking, and even less time for protesting.  The populace, in general, due to policies such as this became far more docile, and much more fractured.

 

Will there be a future time when we once again see protest such as that which happened in the 60s and 70s?

 

Nothing can last forever.

The Billionaires know this.

 

And, by the way, who will be the world's first Trillionaire?

 

I hope it will be Elon.

 

[jas007]

No one has given Trump dictatorial powers.  The US wasn't set up that way and it isn't about to change just because the voters got sick of how the Democrats were destroying the country and wanted to try something different.  Legally, there's a "separation of powers."  The executive, the legislative, and the judicial. The constitution was set up to prevent a dictator-like situation. And t works. Sometimes too well, as we can se from the gridlock in DC.  Still, it's better than the alternative. 

 

Will the voters be disappointed?  Many of them, especially all the people who will lose their jobs in the coming months and years.  Not necessarily because of Trump and the budget cuts that will be implementing where he can, but because of new disruptive business models and the rise of artificial intelligence.  And that's happening at warp speed.  A new industrial revolution of sorts. 

 

Millions of people will lose their jobs to AI "agents" and businesses implementing artificial intelligence solutions. Accountants, some lawyers, paralegals, clerical workers. Basically, anyone engaged in a mid-level white collar job should be prepared for unemployment.  And it won't be just those people. Robotics is also coming of age.  Humanoid robots available at a very reasonable cost. Just the occasional recharging, and they're good to go.  And they will be able to be programed to do all sorts of different tasks. People will be losing factory jobs. 

 

In any event, the country can no longer afford business as usual.  The bond market is already on life support.  So it's change or else.  

[bunnydrops]

31 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

I hope it will be Elon.

Will that make him Hog at Trough or Rooster on Dunghill?

[GammaGlobulin]

1 minute ago, bunnydrops said:

Will that make him Hog at Trough or Rooster on Dunghill?

 

It will make him first Trillionaire in history.

I know he can do it.

 

My only concern is that he may fall prey to the trap of Ultimate Power corrupting Absolutely.

 

It might seem from recent events that this power trip, which all fall prey to, has not passed Elon by.

He seems to have been becoming Power Happy during the year 2024.

 

Hope it ain't so.

He needs to get a grip, and get back to this core tech achievements.

Elon should just return to 100-percent focus on his Mars Missions....

 

One Million Man Mars Settlement.

I want to see this happen in my lifetime...just for the heck of it.