Jump to content

Rapist in UK claiming he is Bisexual Avoids Deportation to Jamaica Amid Fear of Persecution


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

A Jamaican man convicted of rape has avoided deportation from the UK after judges ruled he could face persecution in his home country due to his bisexuality. The case has sparked debate after an upper tribunal upheld the decision to allow him to remain in the UK despite his criminal conviction and the Home Office's attempts to remove him.

 

The man, identified only as AA, was convicted in 2018 for raping a sleeping woman at a party. At the time, AA claimed he did not understand that engaging in sexual activity with someone asleep constituted rape. He served a seven-year sentence for what a tribunal described as a "serious offence." Following his conviction, he expressed remorse, wrote an apology to the victim, and attended a victim awareness course.

 

At the initial tribunal hearing, Judge Mary Mulready noted AA’s troubled past in Jamaica. As a teenager, he entered into a relationship with an older man, which he did not recognize as abuse at the time. That man was later murdered. During his adolescence in Jamaica, AA experienced repeated violent attacks, which left him with scars from assaults involving a machete, a metal bar, and even dogs.

 

The tribunal also reviewed expert evidence on anti-LGBTQ+ attitudes in Jamaica. It found that AA would likely face significant discrimination and potentially violence if deported. Judge Mulready ruled that the man’s fear of persecution in Jamaica was “well-founded,” citing evidence of ingrained hostility toward LGBTQ+ individuals in the country.

 

While Mulready expressed doubts about AA’s credibility in some aspects of his testimony, she acknowledged his participation in rehabilitation efforts, including the victim awareness course. She also noted that the threat of imprisonment acted as a deterrent for reoffending, even if AA lacked complete insight into his crime.

 

In 2023, the case was reviewed by the upper tribunal, with Judge Melissa Canavan agreeing with the original decision. Canavan highlighted the “embedded nature of anti-gay and LGBTQI+ attitudes in Jamaica,” concluding that AA would likely face treatment similar to the violence he had endured in the past.

 

The Home Office, which had sought to deport AA upon his release, expressed dissatisfaction with the ruling. A spokesperson stated, “We make no apology for wanting to remove foreign national offenders at the earliest opportunity. We work with law enforcement to ensure there is no barrier to deport foreign criminals, as it is in the public interest for these people to be removed swiftly.”

 

While AA’s legal team emphasized the danger he would face in Jamaica, critics of the decision argue that public safety and accountability should take precedence. The case has reignited discussions about balancing human rights protections with the public interest in removing foreign offenders.

 

Based on a report by The Times 2024-01-15

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

image.png

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Tailwagsdog said:

Why would you put the safety of your own citizens at risk over a heinous criminal.

 

Your username describes it succinctly.

 

The tail really is wagging the dog 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

He's clearly playing the system, and the Lefties will back him up due to his "human rights" or whatever. 

 

The UK continues its journey down the toilet. 

He was convicted of a rape in 2018, the ruling on his deportation was passed on 2023.

 

It’s chilly this morning, you might need to take your mitts off to count back to figure out what those dates tell you about who was running the country at the time.

 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

Once again the judiciary in the UK are more concerned about foreigners than their own people!

So no surprise there!😟

The judiciary are concerned with the law.

 

 

  • Sad 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The judiciary are concerned with the law.

 

 

I think it was a fictional character in a Charles Dickens book who said - 'the law is an ass'. the same is going on in Ireland - judges giving completely daft judgements, ignoring the victim to 'give a break', to the perps.   time  after time,    (and, from what i read, the  population is not exactly thrilled about this direction the judiciary is taking)

  • Love It 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, jippytum said:

 The world has gone mad. Rapists turning gay to avoid deportation. Gay... He was convicted of raping a sleeping woman. 

 Convicted men identifying as female to be sent to a woman's prison. 

The sooner we leave the European Court of human rights and  curtail woke human rights lawyers making a fortune from the legal aid system helping these criminals  avoid justice the better our country will be. 

I see you’ve paid have got the message.

 

Though you’ve not yet worked out that human rights laws also protect you and your family.

 

They do however er get in the way of big business and big profits.

 

Choose wisely.

  • Sad 2
Posted
6 hours ago, Social Media said:

At the initial tribunal hearing, Judge Mary Mulready noted AA’s troubled past in Jamaica. As a teenager, he entered into a relationship with an older man, which he did not recognize as abuse at the time. That man was later murdered. During his adolescence in Jamaica, AA experienced repeated violent attacks, which left him with scars from assaults involving a machete, a metal bar, and even dogs.

 

 

I thought she was supposed to be the judge, not his apologist/defense lawyer?

 

 

Posted
53 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

He was convicted of a rape in 2018, the ruling on his deportation was passed on 2023.

 

It’s chilly this morning, you might need to take your mitts off to count back to figure out what those dates tell you about who was running the country at the time.

 

Never needed mitts in Thailand ever, where are you?

Posted
13 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Never needed mitts in Thailand ever, where are you?

 

Labour HQ


We have Mr English is not 1st Language this morning

 

38 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I see you’ve paid have got the message.

 

It's English Jim, just not as we know it

Posted
5 hours ago, Tailwagsdog said:

Why would you put the safety of your own citizens at risk over a heinous criminal. The UK really needs to drain their swamp of civil servants and officials with deranged thinking to get society back on track...

Do they still catch overstayers and let them go if they have no passport? Whoever invented that policy? ...just crazy..

 

There's a "heinous criminal" involved here?

 

I must have missed that bit.

Posted
2 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

I thought she was supposed to be the judge, not his apologist/defense lawyer?

 

 

His alleged troubled past allowed him to escape to the Uk and freedom. He responded by raping an unconscious woman. 

Posted

Court judge Granting a Defacto Permanent Residency to the rapist?

 

An Idiot in wig creating a Big Loophole/Safe Heaven  for the dangerous criminal aliens.

 

Sex offenders/perverts all over the world must be overjoyed.

Just like UK's announcing:

Come here and commit a sexual crime: Then you can be a Lawful Settler with ease.

To be qualified, You only have to say you are among the sexual minority not tolerated back home(subject to harsh penalty on return).

 

That bast*rd deserves both deportation and castration(by blade).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...