Jump to content

US Aid Freeze Linked to Refugee's Death at Thai Border


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.jpeg

Mae La refugee camp. Picture courtesy: Wikipedia

 

In a tragic turn of events, the death of a refugee along the Myanmar-Thai border has been linked to a freeze on US foreign aid. The International Rescue Committee (IRC)-funded healthcare facility, recently shuttered due to the US policy shift, had been the lifeline for many refugees like Pe Kha Lau, who sadly passed away.

 

Pe Kha Lau, a 71-year-old refugee with chronic lung issues, succumbed to her condition just days after being discharged from the healthcare facility.

 

The hospital, once a crucial part of the IRC's mission to aid thousands of displaced individuals, was abruptly closed following a "stop-work" directive prompted by the US State Department.

 

This closure follows President Donald Trump's administration's decision to halt nearly all US aid pending a thorough review over the coming months.

 

The IRC has expressed devastation over the loss, while the US Embassy in Bangkok has yet to provide a statement. Amidst uncertainty, the IRC highlighted efforts by the refugee community to self-organize and maintain essential services during this transition. The Thai authorities are also stepping in to support these services.

 

The situation escalated as US President Trump and advisor Elon Musk spearhead initiatives to curtail what they describe as "wasteful" foreign expenses. However, this stands to impact countless individuals dependent on US aid for survival.

 

The US, as the world’s largest humanitarian donor, has stopped most aid operations and is in the process of dismantling the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), reducing its global workforce from around 10,000 to 300.

 

image.jpeg

Umpiem camp. File photo.

 

For the refugee community in Umpiem camp, this aid freeze has been catastrophic. Pe Kha Lau’s family, impoverished and residing in one of the remote mountainside camps, relied on the IRC’s medical provision.

 

Pe Kha Lau had been hospitalised for three years, sustained by a continuous oxygen supply, which became unavailable following the hospital's closure.


Her son-in-law, Tin Win, lamented the severe impact the hospital's closure has had, stating, “Whenever she got short of breath, I would carry her right away back to the hospital and she would be fine.” Unfortunately, without hospital access, Pe Kha Lau's family faced insurmountable challenges in caring for her at home due to financial constraints—oxygen being an unaffordable necessity.

 

Authorities attempted to distribute oxygen tanks to patients, but resources were stretched too thin, leaving significant gaps in care continuity. A local Thai health official, who wished to remain anonymous, acknowledged the severity of the situation.

 

Additionally, the closure has forced makeshift solutions for medical emergencies, such as delivering babies in former school buildings under inadequate conditions. Humanitarian groups are alarmed by the global ramifications of the US aid freeze, noting its profound effects on systems designed to combat crises, including famine.

 

As Thai authorities and refugee groups strive to mitigate the consequences, the freeze has underscored the vulnerability of these displaced communities and the critical nature of sustaining international aid mechanisms. With the IRC clinic's abrupt closure, those left behind face an uncertain and challenging future, reported Bangkok Post.

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

-- 2025-02-08

 

image.png

 

image.png

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 6
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, webfact said:

Pe Kha Lau had been hospitalised for three years, sustained by a continuous oxygen supply, which became unavailable following the hospital's closure.

 

Cruel as it may sound, what's the quality of life for someone on oxygen in a hospital for 3 years? 

 

My MIL was begging for death and relief after she'd been bedridden for 10 years.  But they wouldn't let her die out of some distorted concept of compassion.

 

Edit:  I should say, she was begging for relief after a year.  It went on for another 9 years.

 

  • Agree 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, proton said:

Lefties still think USAID was about feeding kiddies in Africa, we can see now it was just a conduit for corruption and waste

 

Guaranteed, they're going to tie it into ActBlue. 

 

They're the Dem fundraising organization that clocked up thousands of small donations from people who don't remember donating hundreds of times.

 

  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Hamus Yaigh said:
That statement definitely reflects a narrow and short-sighted view of the world. It ignores the interconnections of the global community and the long-term benefits of providing aid.
 
Such attitudes can come back to bite the US in the long run - China is laughing at you. For example, the lack of health care infrastructure in some developing countries can lead to the spread of infectious diseases, which can then travel across borders and affect Americans as well. Similarly, political instability in other countries can create economic and security problems for the US.
 

Again - the US can't take care of the health of its own citizens first.  Until it can, it's not the responsiblity of the US to care for the rest of the world.  Using your own logic, the lack of proper healthcare for all of its citizens can "lead to the spread of infectious diseases."

My guess is that between 2020 and 2023, maybe even to the present, you have worn a mask and taken all of the Covid shots, and have had Covid at least once.  Maybe if the US didn't fund so many gain-of-function labs in the past we wouldn't have so many infectious diseases.  Lab leaks, deliberate or accidental, imho probably cause the vast majority of novel epidemics.

And using your own logic, the US should be supplying me with the same healthcare as they do refugees on the Thai border in order to prevent "the spread of infectious diseases," as being a US citizen, I'm the one most likely to travel cross-border and bring sickness into my own country.  And yet?  They don't.  So enough - we're polar opposites in our beliefs and that will never be resolved. I'm glad the Trump Administration and DOGE have shut off the spigot of US funding, and hopefully when they turn it on again it's "America and Americans First" and then we can discuss the rest of the world.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
1 hour ago, KhunLA said:

And if USA or it's aid funding never existed ?

 

He just stopped USAID  a short time ago.  Maybe someone should audit the books and see where the funding went.

 

It's about time the people stopped relying on US tax payer, in debt themselves, to carry the load worldwide.  Why does the world expect the USA, to borrow money, they can't pay back, to finance other countries programs.

 

" Sooner or later, you run out of other peoples money "  That time is NOW.

 

THANK YOU President Trump.

 

R I P

If it's not the USA, then it's Russia or China.

Or, is this an alternative you prefer?

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Hamus Yaigh said:
That statement definitely reflects a narrow and short-sighted view of the world. It ignores the interconnections of the global community and the long-term benefits of providing aid.
 
Such attitudes can come back to bite the US in the long run - China is laughing at you. For example, the lack of health care infrastructure in some developing countries can lead to the spread of infectious diseases, which can then travel across borders and affect Americans as well. Similarly, political instability in other countries can create economic and security problems for the US.
 

China was laughing, when democrats were in charge. Now theyll have to wait another four years to take advantage

  • Like 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

If it's not the USA, then it's Russia or China.

Or, is this an alternative you prefer?

How about TH taking care of their own.   Where's all the relocation money, tourist are charged to visit the interment camps ?

 

RU & CN aren't dumb enough to borrow money to give away.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

Typical MAGA response.
"Can't see it from the porch of my dilapidated single wide."

 

Shows you what you know.  Mine's a double wide. And the politically correct word is "vintage"

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

Typical MAGA response.
"Can't see it from the porch of my dilapidated single wide."

Typical racist Democrat response.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Artisi said:

Just another intelligent Trump initiative - absolutely no pre-thought or consideration regarding the outcome. 

What?  He is getting the outcome he wants.  Your the one who had never considered the outcome of the Corruption going on.

Posted
3 hours ago, Artisi said:

Just another intelligent Trump initiative - absolutely no pre-thought or consideration regarding the outcome. 

 

It is unfortunate. However, please explain why the USA is responsible for paying for the medical care for these people? China is a major  presence in the region. Where is its aid money? What about India, Iran , Russia and the Gulf states? They too have many of their people in the area, more so than the USA, so they should be. contributing.

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
54 minutes ago, hotsun said:

China was laughing, when democrats were in charge. Now theyll have to wait another four years to take advantage

They are having a field day becaus eof the presence of the pimply faced kids who have destroyed any semblance of security  for the government's IT systems.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Patong2021 said:

 

It is unfortunate. However, please explain why the USA is responsible for paying for the medical care for these people? China is a major  presence in the region. Where is its aid money? What about India, Iran , Russia and the Gulf states? They too have many of their people in the area, more so than the USA, so they should be. contributing.

True. But there is another way. Slower and more thoughtful! Abrupt shutoff is a bad idea.   

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...