Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

NO, actually one of the best things to happen in decades, if not my lifetime.   

 

About time things get pointed out, the curtain pulled back and silliness exposed, and maybe changed, though very doubtful.   As more than half the country are just too freakin' stupid, too brainwashed, or just don't care, as long as they are getting theirs.

 

Do you really think Elon Musk should be allowed to do that?

 

I understand and agree that the government should be more efficient. But the way this is handled is just not the right way. Musk and his team have way too much permissions - as far as I know often without security clearance. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
Posted
27 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

You're not paying attention.  Musk has some of the highest security clearance for a civilian.  

 

And why shouldn't the govt expenditures not be open to a 'real' audit.  All this should have been common knowledge long before President Trump and Elon Musk arrived on the scene.

 

We know the why, as the facts are exposed.   Way too many 'questionable' funding of very questionable folks.

 

Much I already knew, but never suspected it would be as silly as we're learning now.

 

Can't wait till he hopefully audits the Pentagon.  They've admitted losing trillions in the past.  Would be nice to know just how much is unaccounted for.

 

Add NASA to that also.

 

Finance coups / regime change, should have been common knowledge for most.  But the other stuff we're learning ... really unbelievable & embarrassing.

 

How any two+ term incumbent would be reelected is mind boggling.  All involved with much of the funding should be banned from govt offices now and in the future.

"Can't wait till he hopefully audits the Pentagon.  They've admitted losing trillions in the past.  Would be nice to know just how much is unaccounted for."

 

That is the important one simply because it is by far the biggest portion of the discretionary budget.

The discretionary budget does not include expenditures that are required by law and these can be changed.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, KhunLA said:

You're not paying attention.  Musk has some of the highest security clearance for a civilian.  

 

And why shouldn't the govt expenditures not be open to a 'real' audit.  All this should have been common knowledge long before President Trump and Elon Musk arrived on the scene.

 

We know the why, as the facts are exposed.   Way too many 'questionable' funding of very questionable folks.

 

Much I already knew, but never suspected it would be as silly as we're learning now.

 

Can't wait till he hopefully audits the Pentagon.  They've admitted losing trillions in the past.  Would be nice to know just how much is unaccounted for.

 

Add NASA to that also.

 

Finance coups / regime change, should have been common knowledge for most.  But the other stuff we're learning ... really unbelievable & embarrassing.

 

How any two+ term incumbent would be reelected is mind boggling.  All involved with much of the funding should be banned from govt offices now and in the future.

We the people voted for….
 

Opening a can of worms:

“To create a situation that causes a lot of problems when it starts to be dealt with: She is afraid that she will open a can of worms if she speaks out about the problem. Corruption is a serious problem, but nobody has yet been willing to open up that can of worms”.

 

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/open-a-can-of-worms

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

 

Do you really think Elon Musk should be allowed to do that?

 

I understand and agree that the government should be more efficient. But the way this is handled is just not the right way. Musk and his team have way too much permissions - as far as I know often without security clearance. 

Absolutely spot on, some of the things that Trump is doing are good, but the way he is going about it is all wrong. The man is a huge bull in a China closet in his approach to everything in life. Expect a lot of destruction, and not the good kind. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Purdey said:

Did the crowd then violently enter the GOVENMENT BUILDING?

I was just about to say that. Trying to invite comparisons to the two is disingenuos at best, outright lying at worst. Trumps exact words were ''If you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore' which perhaps could be seen in the same light as Warren's 'We are here to fight back.', if not for the somewhat inconvenient fact that his ganboys then actually did head to The Capitol Building, fought hand-to-hand with the security services before actually invading the building. 

 

How anyone can see these two things as being remotely similar is beyond me.

Posted
15 minutes ago, TedG said:

It’s not true.  The left always needs a boogy man, and Musk is the current one. 

 

He is the best!

He is an idiot, I fired him.

 

That's the typical Trump hire and fire scenario.

I wonder how long it will take before Trump tells everybody that Musk is bad and does not know what he is doing and all that.

And then obviously the MAGA boys will follow their leader. 

 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, TedG said:

It’s not true.  The left always needs a boogy man, and Musk is the current one. 

Well if he kept his Asperger’s nose out of everything then he wouldn’t be.   
He’s the one who thinks it’s his divine right (God complex much?) to insert himself into all these situations mostly though cherry picking points, misrepresenting facts and downright lying, 

All broadcast through one of the biggest load speakers there is. He deserves everything he gets. No sympathy at all for him. 

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 hour ago, TedG said:

Name a Democrat who does not lie 

Whataboutism at its finest. The subject was Musk and you’ll be hard pressed to find anyone (well perhaps Trump) who lies more. 

Posted
6 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:
7 hours ago, Flyguy330 said:

"In the building behind me, Elon Musk is seizing power from the American people,"

Have you considered that the above is true and not in the interest of American people? 

Why should he consider something that clearly is not true to be true?

  • Like 2
Posted
17 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:
1 hour ago, TedG said:

Name a Democrat who does not lie 

Whataboutism at its finest. The subject was Musk and you’ll be hard pressed to find anyone (well perhaps Trump) who lies more. 

How about the entire Democrat membership of Congress and the Senate?    None of them are paragons of honesty.

  • Like 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

You were the one that mentioned “old and out of touch”. 

You are old and out of touch. 

  • Love It 1
Posted

Warren is being targeted by the criminally corrupt lawless president and oligarchs because of her involvement in an agency now killed that cost the U.S. budget a pittance but saved consumers many billions of dollars. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, TedG said:

Liz Warren is an exampe of what is wroing with congress.   Old and out of touch. 

Always on the warpath about something. 

 

Term limits are desperately needed.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, Hanaguma said:

Always on the warpath about something. 

 

Term limits are desperately needed.

I agree, term limits are needed.  There are too many members of the Senate who die in office.  

Posted
7 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Warren is being targeted by the criminally corrupt lawless president and oligarchs because of her involvement in an agency now killed that cost the U.S. budget a pittance but saved consumers many billions of dollars. 

Warren should be targeted.  She is an idiot. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...