Jump to content

Democrats have literally lost their minds: The Conception Begins at Erection Act


Recommended Posts

Posted

Not The Babylon Bee (but it should be):

"The bill was brought forward by Democratic State reps Anita Somani and Tristan Rade. Men would be charged with a felony under the law if they engage in unprotected sex without the intent of impregnation. Exceptions under the law include people ejaculating in the LGBTQ community, sperm donation, and masturbation. The lawmakers say the point of "The Conception Begins at Erection Act" is to "call out the hypocrisy" of "bills that regulate women’s bodies." Men would be charged $1,000 for the first offense, $5,000 for the second offense and $10,000 for any offense after."

 

 

 

 

 

  • Haha 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, connda said:

Not The Babylon Bee (but it should be):

"The bill was brought forward by Democratic State reps Anita Somani and Tristan Rade. Men would be charged with a felony under the law if they engage in unprotected sex without the intent of impregnation. Exceptions under the law include people ejaculating in the LGBTQ community, sperm donation, and masturbation. The lawmakers say the point of "The Conception Begins at Erection Act" is to "call out the hypocrisy" of "bills that regulate women’s bodies." Men would be charged $1,000 for the first offense, $5,000 for the second offense and $10,000 for any offense after."

 

 

 

 

 

Seems those 2 need a bit of 'your fired' action

Posted
19 minutes ago, connda said:

Not The Babylon Bee (but it should be):

"The bill was brought forward by Democratic State reps Anita Somani and Tristan Rade. Men would be charged with a felony under the law if they engage in unprotected sex without the intent of impregnation. Exceptions under the law include people ejaculating in the LGBTQ community, sperm donation, and masturbation. The lawmakers say the point of "The Conception Begins at Erection Act" is to "call out the hypocrisy" of "bills that regulate women’s bodies." Men would be charged $1,000 for the first offense, $5,000 for the second offense and $10,000 for any offense after."

 

 

 

 

 

I'd be OK with that if there were NO exceptions.

And that includes women who are no longer fertile, or anyone lacking a working womb!

And not only charge the men, infertile women would need to be charged with fraud.

Posted

Quickly checked the calendar and... no, it's not April 1st...

 

I know Democrats lost the elections in a big way, many of the reasons were the policies they were pushing over the years. But this is doubling down on the same, and pushing them even further away from the centre of common values, to ever narrower group of supporters.

 

Parties generally work towards winning more votes in the next election, with the test in less than 2 years, but this doesn't seem to be where Ohio is going, if the above is what they actually want to do.

 

In fact, I'd recommend Anita and Tristan to apply for the jobs at the Vatican, although they might even be seen as too extreme for them. Maybe there are some jobs available in Mecca? Though, Mr. Tristan, there might be calamari removal required before being allowed to take that role...

Posted

How much longer must we wait for AGI to replace nutjobs?

 

A truly intelligent AGI will definitely discern when a human is a nutjob.

Then, replacement will be easy.

 

The AI will just create a likeness of the nutjob.

But, the nutjob will no longer be a nutjob.

 

This same thing happened in the Stepford Wives....the 1975 original...NOT the nutjob 2004 version.

 

In Stepford 1975, the men were getting what they always dreamed of.

 

 

 

And, NO nutjobs.

 

Also, when you go back and look at some 1973 films, this was about the very LAST year you could find American women who were still appealing.

 

Not fat-slob airheads....

Although, yes, unfortunately, after conversion, probably the typical Stepford wife (1975) was a little bit of an airhead.

Still, nothing is perfect.

And, better than today.

 

 

 

Posted
This is just a put-on related to the Harris-Kavanaugh hearing when then Sen. Harris had this re abortion any opinion:

“Can you think of any laws that give government the power to make decisions about the male body?” she asked.
Kavanaugh froze for several seconds before responding, “I'm happy to answer a more specific question.”
“Male versus female,” Harris replied.
After a back and forth, Kavanaugh told Harris, “I'm not thinking of any right now, senator.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/kamala-harris-brett-kavanaugh/story
Posted

Any male with a few brain cells knows which part of a woman's cycle is fertile, and which is not.

 

Unprotected sex with an otherwise fertile woman to prevent what crime? I don't get it.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Any male with a few brain cells knows which part of a woman's cycle is fertile, and which is not.

 

Unprotected sex with an otherwise fertile woman to prevent what crime? I don't get it.

Do they? Google does not everyone

  • Confused 1
Posted
On 2/16/2025 at 11:14 AM, Woke to Sounds said:

Just another cheap shot from the Loony Leftists to destroy men, family, man-woman relationships, etc.

 

Getting tiresome now.

Actually the cheap shot was the title of this topic. It isn't "The Democrats" who proposed this bill, but just two of them at the state level.

I could offer far better proof of Republican lunacy  at the federal legislative level.

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, placeholder said:

It isn't "The Democrats" who proposed this bill, but just two of them at the state level.

Sure, but it wasn't two Republicans was it now?

 

Loony loopy radical Leftists. As I said.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...