Jump to content

Do you personally care about the future of Ukraine? (nobody will know)


Do you personally care about the future of Ukraine? (nobody will know)  

87 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 minutes ago, Sir Dude said:

Moldova

I have to admit I had to look it up on a map.

I don't think many people know it and I guess very few will care about it.

  • Sad 2
  • Agree 1
Posted

I agree. A very stupid set of choices.

 

I really don't care about Ukraine .But I also think that anything that weakens Russia is a good thing.

 

The Op should have had a choice that was about Gaza. Then I could also say that I don't care about that either.

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
13 hours ago, Sir Dude said:

Problem is that that Ivan won't stop there... Putler will just see it as a lull so he can regroup and rearm, to attack later and next stop is Moldova... probably after Trump's administration ends. The naievety of the West knows no bounds... bunch of morons.

I said I don't care in the poll, and I wasn't alone. I also don't care about Moldova or any other Eastern European **** **** country.

 

Even Putin isn't going to want Russia to be destroyed so he won't attack any NATO country.

 

Much ado about nothing IMO.

 

Now, bring on the attack posts, but as most will be on ignore attack away by all means, as I won't see them.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Posted

The reality is that Ukrainians living in the Russian areas will experience a higher GDP per capita and a better quality of life than those who live in the rest of Ukraine. 

 

That's not an endorsement of Putin.  I's a statement of fact, based on widely available data.  Russia's economy was better, and though it's corrupt, it's less corrupt than Ukraine.

 

It's like if the USA invaded Baja Mexico.  The inhabitants would see a massive improvement in their quality of life.  But that doesn't mean I advocate an invasion.

 

  • Confused 2
  • Thanks 2
Posted
1 hour ago, bangadang said:

 

The previous president, democratically elected, was overthrown by CIA/USA. Zelensky term was finished, and so he is a dictator. The USA held elections during WW2 I think you are the dummie here and, actually, you are a bully.

Leftists 

  • Confused 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

And according to your "logic" it's ok to invade a corrupt nation. Interesting.

And let's not forget that Russia is also pretty corrupt.

So, what are the rules of a corrupt nation invading another corrupt nation?

Both bad guys? You lefties ever thought of that?

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, hotandsticky said:

 

 

That would be OK if your home country was Russia.................................but I suspect it isn't.

 

No, it's not. And once that war is finally over, guess whom media and politicians will blame for all ills in society, economy, and politics - Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump... (And no, my country isn't the U.S. either.)

  • Confused 2
  • Agree 1
Posted

To the winner goes the spoils.

 

No conflict in modern history has ended without the loser giving up major concessions/land. Why should (just as corrupt) Z/Ukraine deserve better?.

 

Breadbasket of Europe, lol. I'll gladly give up wheat bread.

 

The next great military alliance will ideally be the US, China and Russia, and it will make Europe and the UK its military and economic little bi__ch.. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
21 hours ago, Sir Dude said:

Problem is that that Ivan won't stop there... Putler will just see it as a lull so he can regroup and rearm, to attack later and next stop is Moldova... probably after Trump's administration ends. The naievety of the West knows no bounds... bunch of morons.

I have a work colleague from Moldova. Now it's personal.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Purdey said:

I have a work colleague from Moldova. Now it's personal.

 

What you have to understand is what Putin wants, and that is the access points to the Russian interior that facilitate invasion, there are 7 of them... and Moldova is one of then, hence why Putin wants to go through Ukraine. There is another in the Causcuses, hence the Chechen/Georgia wars, another in the Baltics like Poland and Silwaki gap/Estonia etc.

During the Soviet time they controleed all of these places that you could drive an invasion force through, but lost them when the Soviet Union collapsed... why do you think the Russians are so interested in Trandsniestria and has troops there? It's all about securing these points and the Russians want the natural mountain barriers alongside them as defences, all they have to do is put a division in the gaps and good to go. Look at how easy historically it has been to invade Russia once you get to the vast open steppes etc... they don't like that.

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

Not really it's sad then many things are sad 6 million have died in the Congo in the biggest genocide since WW2 and no one really cares about that. I'm a Brit on an island with nukes. I would prefer if we stopped pretenidng we rule the world any more and looked after ourselves. Switzerland has done well by staying out of wars we could do the same. Let the water find it's own level in the slav lands far away, what will be will be.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...