Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

And it seems that often same people that are up in arms about Russia invading Ukraine applauded Palestine invading Israel. 

 

To be clear, I oppose both and see both Russia and Palestine as criminal invaders. 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 3/1/2025 at 12:45 PM, SMIAI said:

 

Every post just a Right Wing talking point. Littered with insults, but scant intelligence.

I guess it gets your post count up.

 

Pot bubbling. Nearly ready.

  • Confused 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:


Likewise none of you ever ever posted anything about Ukraine, Zelensky, his performance, popularity, his dress sense - nothing - in the last three years. Only now when Trump trots out his nonsense you parrot it without any due diligence and you literally didn't care before, probably couldn't even point to Ukraine on a map.

 

If my memory serves well, I think it's that big fairly flat bit just to the left of, but adjacent to.....hmmm....Russia!

Posted
Just now, Bkk Brian said:

Absolutely, its revealing to read the sudden concern after 3 years of silence.

They care a lot more about quashing anything that can be seen as a win Trump than they do about kids dying in Ukraine. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

They care a lot more about quashing anything that can be seen as a win Trump than they do about kids dying in Ukraine. 

It certainly seems that way

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

All the left has are jokes, memes, name-calling and conspiracy theories about Trump being a Russian asset, even though after eight years of lawfare they have not been able to prove a bit of it. 

 

Meanwhile at the grownups table: 

 

"Zelensky vows to 'make things right' with Trump and negotiate peace" 

 

Zelensky vows to 'make things right' with Trump and negotiate peace

Posted
Just now, xylophone said:

Marco Rubio is exactly what you thought he was. Here, in a decade old clip, he gives an accurate history lesson - Ukraine gave up its post Soviet supply of nuclear weapons in exchange for security assurances from the US, UK and Russia. https://www.npr.org/2022/02/21/1082124528/... Now Rubio is presiding Secretary of State as Ukraine is betrayed, first by Russia, and now by the Trump administration in an historically shameful display.

 

ttps://youtu.be/FyJY_dq8_SM?feature=sharedh

 

Disgusting.

 

 

What I think is disgusting are the people that sabotaged the agreement Zelensky was supposed to sign. 

 

The anti-Trumpers would rather see every Ukrainian dead and half of Europe flattened than to see a peace agreement negotiated by Trump

  • Confused 2
Posted
22 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Which 136 Countries were they and what aid did those countries provide ?

This from the archives of the US Dept of State should be enough to be getting on with............

 

Since September 11, President Bush has met with leaders from at least 51 different countries to help build support for the war against terrorism.

 

-136 countries have offered a range of military assistance.

-The U.S. has received 46 multilateral declarations of support from organizations.

-The U.N. General Assembly and Security Council condemned the attacks on September 12.

-NATO, OAS and ANZUS (Australia, New Zealand and the U.S.) quickly invoked their treaty obligations to support the United States. Our NATO allies are assisting directly in the defense of American territory.

-142 countries have issued orders freezing the assets of suspected terrorists and organizations.

-89 countries have granted over-flight authority for U.S. military aircraft.

-76 countries have granted landing rights for U.S. military aircraft.

-23 countries have agreed to host U.S. forces involved in offensive operations

 

https://20012009.state.gov/s/ct/rls/wh/6947.htm#:~:text=NATO%2C%20OAS%20and%20ANZUS%20(Australia,the%20defense%20of%

  • Love It 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, xylophone said:

This from the archives of the US Dept of State should be enough to be getting on with............

 

Since September 11, President Bush has met with leaders from at least 51 different countries to help build support for the war against terrorism.

 

-136 countries have offered a range of military assistance.

-The U.S. has received 46 multilateral declarations of support from organizations.

-The U.N. General Assembly and Security Council condemned the attacks on September 12.

-NATO, OAS and ANZUS (Australia, New Zealand and the U.S.) quickly invoked their treaty obligations to support the United States. Our NATO allies are assisting directly in the defense of American territory.

-142 countries have issued orders freezing the assets of suspected terrorists and organizations.

-89 countries have granted over-flight authority for U.S. military aircraft.

-76 countries have granted landing rights for U.S. military aircraft.

-23 countries have agreed to host U.S. forces involved in offensive operations

 

https://20012009.state.gov/s/ct/rls/wh/6947.htm#:~:text=NATO%2C%20OAS%20and%20ANZUS%20(Australia,the%20defense%20of%

 

   So, they didn't actually give the USA  any money ?

So, the countries could hardly ask for any money back from the USA

  • Haha 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:


You don't half come out with some sweeping rubbish. Absolute tosh and you throw these completely fabricated and ludicrous accusations around left right and centre - I really have no idea why it is tolerated.

You're obsessed

  • Confused 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   So, they didn't actually give the USA  any money ?

So, the countries could hardly ask for any money back from the USA

I can't quite believe what you have written, because it shows a huge amount of naïveté, something befitting of a juvenile or someone with a lack of grey matter.

 

The actions that were taken by countries around the world cost money and although it may not have been given to the USA directly, it was given to them indirectly in the form of aid and support, because to put these actions in place, surely does cost money......

 

Terrorist Finances.  The world financial community is moving to starve the terrorists of their financial support. 196 countries support the financial war on terror; 142 countries have acted to freeze terrorist assets; in the U.S. alone, the assets of 153 known terrorists, terrorist organizations, and terrorist financial centers have been frozen; and major terrorist financial networks have been closed down.


The military action in Afghanistan represents a global coalition effort. In addition to the United States, military assets are being deployed from many other nations, including the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Poland, Russia and Turkey.


https://2001-2009.state.gov/s/ct/rls/wh/6947.htm#:~:text=NATO%2C OAS and ANZUS (Australia,the defense of American territory.
 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 hours ago, xylophone said:

 

image.png.165b5249774d50edde6e18555e57524b.png

 

 

 

 

7 minutes ago, xylophone said:

I can't quite believe what you have written, because it shows a huge amount of naïveté, something befitting of a juvenile or someone with a lack of grey matter.
 

 

   My simplistic post  was in reply to your simplistic false statement stated in the first post .

 The whole World is fighting against terrorism and terrorists attack numerous Countries , the World isn't fighting against terrorists to do the USA a favour , the world is fighting against terrorists to keep themselves safe from them .

   BTW , did the Ukraine help the USA after 9/11 , like to the tune of 200 Billion  ?

 

  • Haha 2
Posted
12 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

 

   My simplistic post  was in reply to your simplistic false statement stated in the first post .

 The whole World is fighting against terrorism and terrorists attack numerous Countries , the World isn't fighting against terrorists to do the USA a favour , the world is fighting against terrorists to keep themselves safe from them .

   BTW , did the Ukraine help the USA after 9/11 , like to the tune of 200 Billion  ?

 

Granted, simplistic my post may have been, however I then posted facts to back up my original post.

 

And yes Ukraine did help the US after 9/11, but not to the tune of 200 billion and the US has not helped Ukraine to the tune of 200 billion, in fact Europe has assisted Ukraine to the tune of $266 billion, whilst the US figure is around $128 billion, although figures do vary.

 

Ukraine: The Verkhovna Rada (parliament) declared solidarity with the United States, and offered moral, technical and military support to the extent of their infrastructure. Parliament passed three resolutions all in favor of assisting the United States following the attacks. Congressman Bob Schaffer expressed his gratitude towards Ukraine and its stance on terrorism, saying "Ukraine's condemnation of international terrorism, its much-appreciated support in the war on terrorism, its tough newly enacted laws to combat terrorism, and its commitment to fight at the side of the United States and its allies for civil society and democracy demonstrates the role Ukraine and her people intend to play in the emerging democracy.

 

In events such as these the wealthiest countries are obviously expected to be the major providers of financial assistance, and there is one overarching consideration, by virtue of the speech which Marco Rubio gave when urging Ukraine to give up their nuclear arsenal in return for "protection" and I provided the link a few posts ago but I will do it again for you shortly, so the US has a moral obligation to defend Ukraine as promised by the Marco Rubio speech.....in effect the US gave its word to Ukraine. 

 

What is the value of the promise from the US now? Worthless??
 

Posted
15 hours ago, xylophone said:

The military action in Afghanistan represents a global coalition effort. In addition to the United States, military assets are being deployed from many other nations, including the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Poland, Russia and Turkey.
 

 

All of those nations should have stayed out of that. It was military adventurism by the US in their own interests. But the US has always leaned on, and relied on its allies for support. It came too easily because those countries were grovelling little vassals of the US Empire.

I'm glad to see - and I hope it's true - that those days are over, and the next time the US decides to batter some sandpit they'll be told 'Yer on yer own now buddy, eff off'.

Reap what you sow.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...