Jump to content

Betrayed Warriors: The SAS Veterans Facing Legal Persecution


Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I don’t think there is any suggestion of ‘war crimes’, rather unlawful use of lethal force/unlawful killing.

 

There was no declaration of war and civil law was in force at the time of the killings.

 

 

Why then there have been killings if there was no war? Makes no sense.

And if these killings indeed happened in their daily job...then it's murder.

Let the court decide.

  • Sad 4
Posted
15 minutes ago, transam said:

Oh, and where do you come from........?

 

 oh I come from a land down under  you better run you better take cover !

 

no not really, I already told you were I come from in another tread about "the war"

the country that built Lancaster Bombers.

 

image.jpeg.93c8a1ba460f6b2a4c91c38e0d6230fb.jpeg

  • Sad 2
Posted
Just now, newbee2022 said:

Why then there have been killings if there was no war? Makes no sense.

And if these killings indeed happened in their daily job...then it's murder.

Let the court decide.

Yes, let the court decide.

  • Sad 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, transam said:

Then perhaps you should refrain from putting the boot in regarding UK special forces...🤔

Not at all,

Just because I come from that country doesn't mean I have to agree with everything the "special forces"  do , I can agree with some of what they do  and

be uncomfortable with some of the things they do  and be totally against some of the things they do  and at the same time acknowledging the "special forces"  are "only following orders" and face severe punishment for disobedience.

  • Sad 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, johng said:

 

 oh I come from a land down under  you better run you better take cover !

 

no not really, I already told you were I come from in another tread about "the war"

the country that built Lancaster Bombers.

 

image.jpeg.93c8a1ba460f6b2a4c91c38e0d6230fb.jpeg

That particular Lancaster Bomber ( The Mynarski Memorial Lancaster) is at the Canadian War Planes Heritage Museum in Canada. A nation that built Lancaster Bombers under license.

 

 

https://www.warplane.com/lady-orchid.aspx

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, transam said:

in other words, you know nothing but like to scrutinise a service that is basically secret

 

Yes they are secret so that means everything they do is perfect  and should have no scrutiny at all ?

  • Sad 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, JAG said:

Says the man who raised the spectre of the NAZI " just following orders defence"

I was merely responding to a quote from the OP.

 

Thanks you for remind where I had previously heard that defense.

 

 

9 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:


The ‘only following orders’ defense.

 

Where have heard that before?

 

 

 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Bkk Brian said:

So true. Left wing "ambulance-chasing, human-rights zealots"

And didn't so many of us chuckle when "Shiner's" little scam came unstuck!

Posted

I've posted this before an account of the actual ambush

 

https://www.forcesnews.com/opinion/opinion-why-sas-didnt-try-capture-ira-clonoe

 

And a bit more information about the SAS in Northern Ireland if anyones really interested

 

https://www.eliteukforces.info/special-air-service/history/northern-ireland/part2/#google_vignette

 

What should be bourne in mind is that this was a coroner's report from a Judge in Belfast Northern Ireland where the vast majority of people are biased one way or the other you can make your own mind up.

 

Personally I doubt very much this will go any further.

  • Like 2
Posted
23 hours ago, Andrew65 said:

It's questionable whether or not the IRA were involved in a war, in the true meaning of it.

Not questionable at all as far as the IRA were concerned it was a war. 

 

They were at war with the British Army who they considered a foreign army  

The Ulster Defence Regiment (UDR) that was formed after the B Specials were disbanded.

The B Specials were 99% Protestant and were a part time armed special police force formed in 1920 whose main job was to counter the IRA, distrusted and hated by the Catholic Community.

And the Royal Ulster Constabulary the police (RUC) who they considered part of the British Establishment even though it was comprised of both Protestant and Catholics.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Have you served? If not, IMO you have no right to pontificate about men that go in harms way to carry out their orders.

In the event they are convicted, expect a decline in the number of men willing to protect YOU.

Yes I have, and I voluntarily enlisted, not drafted/conscripted.  Thank you.

 

Read the link I provided, about the incident in question, and explain to me, why they had to kill 4 people, that were not shooting at them ?

 

They fired 570 rounds, that almost 2 full 30 round mags for 10 people, or 1 mag for 20 people, to kill 4 people.

 

Yea, I think that's a bit excessive.

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
On 3/11/2025 at 3:27 PM, Andrew65 said:

It's questionable whether or not the IRA were involved in a war, in the true meaning of it.

Irish Republican ARMY ....they were in a war

 

regards worgeordie

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, Bannoi said:

They weren't civilians they were active Irish Republican Army (IRA) personnel

Simply calling yourself the 'irish republican army' does not make the military of the govt, in an undeclared war.

 

image.png.3cb58364cfccc5867b637013cce0d50b.png

 

Freedom fighters or terrorist ... UP2U   

In my world dictionary, IRA, if killing civilians, you are terrorist.   Also doesn't mean, you don't deserve due process for your crimes.

 

I'm going to guess, rules of engagement were, 'shoot to kill ... IF ... fired upon', which they were not, supposedly.   Courts will sort it out, maybe.

 

 

Posted
17 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

Simply being called 'irish republican army' does not make the military of the govt.  

 

image.png.3cb58364cfccc5867b637013cce0d50b.png

 

Freedom fighters or terrorist ... UP2U   

In my world dictionary, if killing civilians, you are terrorist.   Also doesn't mean, you don't deserve due process for your crimes.

 

I'm going to guess, rules of engagement were, 'shoot to kill ... IF ... fired upon', which they were not, supposedly.   Courts will sort it out, maybe.

 

 

Civilians or Freedom fighters they were not, terrorists who murdered innocents civilians they were.

 

It was an illegal organisation in the Republic of Ireland and designated a proscribed terrorist organisation in the United Kingdom and the United States. The Real IRA waged a campaign in Northern Ireland against the Police Service of Northern Ireland—formerly the Royal Ulster Constabulary—and the British Army.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, Bannoi said:

They weren't civilians they were active Irish Republican Army (IRA) personnel

They were Terrorists, plain and simple, as were their followers.

 

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...