Wealthy Britons Flee to Italy and Greece Ahead of Tax Hike

[Social Media]

 

A growing number of wealthy British families are rushing to relocate to Italy and Greece before April 5 to avoid the upcoming tax reforms set to take effect in the new financial year. With Labour’s inheritance tax increases, higher capital gains tax, and the abolition of the non-dom regime on the horizon, financial experts report a surge in UK taxpayers seeking lower-tax alternatives abroad.  

 

Under the new rules, all UK residents will be taxed on their global income and gains, and the remittance basis—where tax is only paid on money brought into the UK—will be eliminated. Meanwhile, frozen income tax thresholds, which push more people into higher tax brackets, will remain unchanged until at least 2028-29.  

 

The remittance basis had allowed non-domiciled individuals to avoid UK tax on foreign income, provided they did not bring the money into the country. However, maintaining this status came with an annual charge of £30,000 for those who had been UK residents for at least seven of the previous nine tax years, and £60,000 for those residing in Britain for 12 of the past 14 years.  

 

Chris Etherington, from accountancy firm RSM, noted that Mediterranean countries like Italy and Greece are attracting high-net-worth individuals due to their favorable tax regimes, which resemble the soon-to-be-defunct non-dom rules in Britain. Christopher Groves, a partner at international law firm Withers, reported a "huge spike" in clients relocating to Italy, with many scrambling to leave before the tax year ends. "It’s important to make sure you’re gone by April 6 if you’re going to leave next year. You need to have found your villa in Marbella or apartment in Monaco," he said.  

 

Groves added that the tax changes had forced many to accelerate their departure plans, often in a rushed and unstructured manner. “The changes to non-dom and inheritance tax rules have pushed lots of people who didn’t have a real plan to leave the UK to bring that forward, which means they’re doing things in a less well thought-through way. The world is so small these days, so it feels like a relatively easy step to take, but there can be practical difficulties.”  

 

UK residency is automatically granted to individuals who spend 183 or more days in Britain during a tax year, but moving abroad does not necessarily eliminate UK tax obligations. Some individuals may qualify as non-residents by meeting automatic overseas tests, such as spending fewer than 16 days in the UK if they had not been a resident for the past three years or fewer than 46 days if they had been non-residents for three consecutive years. However, those who fail to meet these tests may still be considered UK residents based on ties such as family, property, or employment.  

 

With Britain’s tax burden at its highest level in 70 years and expected to rise further, the 40% inheritance tax has become a key factor motivating many to relocate. Groves highlighted the disparity with other countries: “We’re so out of step [with other nations]. You can go to Italy and [inheritance tax] is single digits if anything, in Switzerland it’s nothing. Here, 40% above £325,000 is confiscatory by comparison.”  

 

The Office for Budget Responsibility estimates that up to 20% of non-doms may leave the UK due to these tax changes. However, it’s not just non-doms making the move. Wealthy Britons, regardless of residency status, are seeking tax-friendly destinations. In 2024 alone, Britain lost 10,800 millionaires to overseas migration—more than double the number who left in 2023.  

 

Research by the Adam Smith Institute suggests that each millionaire who departed last year would have contributed at least £393,957 in annual income tax—an amount equivalent to the tax payments of 49 average earners. Meanwhile, the Saltus Wealth Index found that more than a quarter (28%) of individuals with investable assets exceeding £250,000 are considering leaving the UK within the next year.  

 

The Treasury was approached for comment on the exodus of Britain’s wealthy but has yet to respond.

 

Based on a report by The Telegraph  2025-03-15

 

 

[ExpatOilWorker]

Norway 🇳🇴 did the same tax "mistake".

 

[klauskunkel]

8 hours ago, Social Media said:

all UK residents will be taxed on their global income and gains

Does that include the Royals?

[youreavinalaff]

2 hours ago, klauskunkel said:

Does that include the Royals?

It does already.

[richard_smith237]

As short sighted as the 20% VAT addition to private schools. 

This government seems to take every policy step in the opposite direction of 'sense'.

 

 

[Red Forever]

Good riddance.

[JonnyF]

1 minute ago, Red Forever said:

Good riddance.

 

Yeah. 

 

Who wants millionaires pumping money into the economy when you can replace them with cultural enrichers?

 

I guess Labour do. Selling the country down the river for votes.

 

 

[JonnyF]

On 3/15/2025 at 7:00 AM, Social Media said:

A growing number of wealthy British families are rushing to relocate to Italy and Greece before April 5 to avoid the upcoming tax reforms set to take effect in the new financial year.

 

Didn't Brexit prevent this?

 

I thought we were barred from EU countries.

 

Oh that's right. Project Fear...

[brewsterbudgen]

31 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Didn't Brexit prevent this?

 

I thought we were barred from EU countries.

 

Oh that's right. Project Fear...

Not barred, but no longer a right to live anywhere in the EU.  Disappointing that Starmer didn't take the opportunity to allow more freedom of movement. 

[youreavinalaff]

26 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Not barred, but no longer a right to live anywhere in the EU.  Disappointing that Starmer didn't take the opportunity to allow more freedom of movement. 

UK citizens have every right to live anywhere in EU. They just need to go through a few easy procedures.

[RayC]

2 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

Didn't Brexit prevent this?

 

I thought we were barred from EU countries.

 

Oh that's right. Project Fear...

 

1) No, Brexit was never going to prevent extremely wealthy Britons from moving to just about anywhere they want. What it did do was prevent the overwhelming majority of the population of the UK freely residing in the other EU states and seeking employment there without restriction.

 

2) Once again, you are mistaken. UK nationals are free to visit EU member states - to be exact, the Schengen zone -  as tourists for up to 90 days in any (rolling) 180 day period.

 

3) 1) and 2) are not examples of 'Project Fear' but the reality of what the ordinary Briton faces today. Throw in the increased bureaucracy and difficulties faced by UK businesses importing from/ exporting to the EU plus the general negative effect of Brexit on the economy and those promised 'sunny uplands' seem to be shrouded in apparently permanent darkness. 

 

Hope that has helped to clarify things for you.

[Patong2021]

20 hours ago, klauskunkel said:

Does that include the Royals?

 

They already  voluntarily pay income tax on income from the Duchies and earnings from personal investments. 

[JonnyF]

5 minutes ago, RayC said:

 

1) No, Brexit was never going to prevent extremely wealthy Britons from moving to just about anywhere they want. What it did do was prevent the overwhelming majority of the population of the UK freely residing in the other EU states and seeking employment there without restriction.

 

2) Once again, you are mistaken. UK nationals are free to visit EU member states - to be exact, the Schengen zone -  as tourists for up to 90 days in any (rolling) 180 day period.

 

3) 1) and 2) are not examples of 'Project Fear' but the reality of what the ordinary Briton faces today. Throw in the increased bureaucracy and difficulties faced by UK businesses importing from/ exporting to the EU plus the general negative effect of Brexit on the economy and those promised 'sunny uplands' seem to be shrouded in apparently permanent darkness. 

 

Hope that has helped to clarify things for you.

 

Wait until Trump hammers the EU on trade. 

 

Even bitter Remainers will be glad to be disassociated from the corrupt EU protectionist racket. 

 

Well maybe not the old diehards like you. But most moderate Liberals will. 

 

Funny how the EU are suddenly anti tariff and pro free trade when the whole concept of the EU is built around tariffs for anyone outside the United States of Europe.

 

Regulate and tax the opposition out of competition. Well they are going to have to taste their own bitter medicine and I will love every minute of it.

 

I hooe Trump absolutely hammers them. Especially German auto. 

 

[Patong2021]

3 hours ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Not barred, but no longer a right to live anywhere in the EU.  Disappointing that Starmer didn't take the opportunity to allow more freedom of movement. 

 

How much more freedom of movement do you want with the hundreds of migrants arriving every day?

[JonnyF]

3 hours ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Not barred, but no longer a right to live anywhere in the EU.  Disappointing that Starmer didn't take the opportunity to allow more freedom of movement. 

 

They still have a right they just have to fill in a form first.

 

Starmer will allow more cultural enrichers from mainland Europe as soon as he thinks he is in a strong enough position to do so.

 

He wants the boat people to vote for him in 4 years. Same as Harris did with the southern border crossers. How did that work out for DEI Harris?

[RayC]

2 hours ago, youreavinalaff said:

UK citizens have every right to live anywhere in EU. They just need to go through a few easy procedures.

 

UK citizens do not have every right to live anywhere in the EU. They have every right to apply for a long-stay visa and then, possibly, be granted residency.

 

The requirements vary by individual EU country but generally to apply for a long-stay visa, a UK national will need to have a) a job offer from a local company b) a close family relative who is a national c) an offer to study in the country d) a sizeable amount of money.

 

Whether the procedures associated with applying for a long-stay visa can be described as "easy", and whether having gone through the process, the individual is granted a visa is another matter. 

 

One thing's for sure: It was a lot simpler for a UK national to be able to live in an EU country when we were a member than it is now.

[RayC]

14 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Wait until Trump hammers the EU on trade. 

 

Even bitter Remainers will be glad to be disassociated from the corrupt EU protectionist racket. 

 

Well maybe not the old diehards like you. But most moderate Liberals will. 

 

Funny how the EU are suddenly anti tariff and pro free trade when the whole concept of the EU is built around tariffs for anyone outside the United States of Europe.

 

Regulate and tax the opposition out of competition. Well they are going to have to taste their own bitter medicine and I will love every minute of it.

 

I hooe Trump absolutely hammers them. Especially German auto. 

 

 

As usual a rant containing empty rhetoric and little, if any, fact 

 

Still, I'm sure that you feel better having got that off your chest?😁

[RayC]

13 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

They still have a right they just have to fill in a form first.

 

Incorrect. See my other post.

 

13 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Starmer will allow more cultural enrichers from mainland Europe as soon as he thinks he is in a strong enough position to do so.

 

The mask is slipping.

 

13 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

He wants the boat people to vote for him in 4 years. Same as Harris did with the southern border crossers. How did that work out for DEI Harris?

 

Given that only British citizens can vote in UK general elections and it normally takes 5 years to become a British resident (not a citizen), this would appear to be a very flawed plan.

[Yagoda]

Wonder how high taxes will go when rearmament starts.

[RayC]

32 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

 

How much more freedom of movement do you want with the hundreds of migrants arriving every day?

 

Illegal immigrants will arrive irrespective of whether the UK is inside or outside the EU.

 

Legal immigration to the UK has increased since Brexit. Removal of freedom of movement for EU nationals is one - arguably the main - contributory reason for this.

[youreavinalaff]

31 minutes ago, RayC said:

 

UK citizens do not have every right to live anywhere in the EU. They have every right to apply for a long-stay visa and then, possibly, be granted residency.

 

The requirements vary by individual EU country but generally to apply for a long-stay visa, a UK national will need to have a) a job offer from a local company b) a close family relative who is a national c) an offer to study in the country d) a sizeable amount of money.

 

Whether the procedures associated with applying for a long-stay visa can be described as "easy", and whether having gone through the process, the individual is granted a visa is another matter. 

 

One thing's for sure: It was a lot simpler for a UK national to be able to live in an EU country when we were a member than it is now.

As I said, they just need to go through a few easy procedures.

[RayC]

Just now, youreavinalaff said:

As I said, they just need to go through a few easy procedures.

 

No what you said was, "UK citizens have every right to live anywhere in EU. They just need to go through a few easy procedures", which is incorrect.

 

If a UK national does not fit into one of the four categories which I listed in my previous post - and most do not - then they are extremely unlikely to be granted the right to remain in the EU for more than 90 days in any 180-day rolling period.

[youreavinalaff]

22 minutes ago, RayC said:

 

No what you said was, "UK citizens have every right to live anywhere in EU. They just need to go through a few easy procedures", which is incorrect.

 

If a UK national does not fit into one of the four categories which I listed in my previous post - and most do not - then they are extremely unlikely to be granted the right to remain in the EU for more than 90 days in any 180-day rolling period.

Like I said.........

 

You are just confirming what I said. With the exception of your last paragraph, as it contains exaggerations.

 

I don't understand why you come across as argumentative when you are showing what I said to be correct.

 

[Liverpool Lou]

"Wealthy Britons Flee to Italy and Greece Ahead of Tax Hike"

 

No one is "fleeing", some are moving.

[RayC]

50 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

Like I said.........

 

You are just confirming what I said. With the exception of your last paragraph, as it contains exaggerations.

 

I don't understand why you come across as argumentative when you are showing what I said to be correct.

 

 

I am not questioning that you said, "UK citizens have every right to live anywhere in EU. They just need to go through a few easy procedures". It is there for all to see. 

 

What I disagree with is the accuracy of the statement. As I stated before UK nationals have every right to APPLY to live in the EU, they do NOT have every right to live there. To state the obvious, applying for residency and that application for residency being approved are two completely different things, and most UK nationals will not now fulfill the criteria necessary to be granted a long-stay visa in an EU member state.

 

The physical act of completing the application form may well be easy. The steps involving in securing the necessary documentation to satisfy the issuing authorities probably aren't so simple.

 

I originally stated that "The requirements vary by individual EU country but generally to apply for a long-stay visa, a UK national will need to have a) a job offer from a local company b) a close family relative who is a national c) an offer to study in the country d) a sizeable amount of money." I should have added a fifth category to cover Brits who were living in the EU prior to 31 January 2020, although I am unsure if their (almost) automatic right to residency has now expired? In any event, which part of this explanation is an exaggeration?

 

I am being argumentative because you will not accept that your original statement is incorrect. As soon as you do - either explicitly or tacitly by not replying to me - then I will stop.

[OJAS]

On 3/15/2025 at 7:00 AM, Social Media said:

A growing number of wealthy British families are rushing to relocate to Italy and Greece before April 5

 

And how many more might be planning to relocate to Thailand clutching passports containing brand new Long-Term Resident visas, I wonder???

 

[youreavinalaff]

1 hour ago, RayC said:

 

I am not questioning that you said, "UK citizens have every right to live anywhere in EU. They just need to go through a few easy procedures". It is there for all to see. 

 

What I disagree with is the accuracy of the statement. As I stated before UK nationals have every right to APPLY to live in the EU, they do NOT have every right to live there. To state the obvious, applying for residency and that application for residency being approved are two completely different things, and most UK nationals will not now fulfill the criteria necessary to be granted a long-stay visa in an EU member state.

 

The physical act of completing the application form may well be easy. The steps involving in securing the necessary documentation to satisfy the issuing authorities probably aren't so simple.

 

I originally stated that "The requirements vary by individual EU country but generally to apply for a long-stay visa, a UK national will need to have a) a job offer from a local company b) a close family relative who is a national c) an offer to study in the country d) a sizeable amount of money." I should have added a fifth category to cover Brits who were living in the EU prior to 31 January 2020, although I am unsure if their (almost) automatic right to residency has now expired? In any event, which part of this explanation is an exaggeration?

 

I am being argumentative because you will not accept that your original statement is incorrect. As soon as you do - either explicitly or tacitly by not replying to me - then I will stop.

Carry on all you like. My statement was true. Just as we have a right to live in Thailand, so long as we abide by the rules. That's true also.

[RayC]

8 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

Carry on all you like. My statement was true. Just as we have a right to live in Thailand, so long as we abide by the rules. That's true also.

 

Your statement was, is and will remain incorrect unless the law(s) governing UK nationals seeking residency in the EU change, or unless your statement amounts to nothing more than 'A UK national can fill in an application form for EU residency'; in which case it is effectively meaningless. The words 'UK' and 'EU' could be replaced by virtually any other nationality/ country and the statement would be true (and equally devoid of any substantive meaning). It certainly does not mean that the applicant will be given the right to reside in the country in question.