.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png.8488ab72b8bb2e508209bfe3211b6e08.png)
Thai Tourists Escape Charges in Cannabis-Luggage Mix-Up in Japan - video
-
Recently Browsing 2 members
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
48
Obese People on Plane Seats.
Strange, because thats only been possible for the last year or two after the train through Laos was completed. Maybe he went as far as China 20 years ago, but not Thailand. I've actually done the whole trip, London to Singapore, but on different trips, not all at once. The longest I did in one trip was Europe to Beijing. -
5
Hawaii Sinking at Alarming Rate: Scientists Warn of Devastating Flooding
Next we'll hear of the "Perils of Man-Made Global Sinking." Of course, there is a solution for that. Just sell all the land, like Oahu, to billionaires and force the commoners to higher ground "for their own safety," of course! -
5
Giving the Russians a piece of my mind.
No. I can confirm that this is/was not me and peter. He is now on soi 6, stoned out of his mind doing god knows what - I am in my apartment about to cook dinner. regards, bob. -
-
84
So whats your favorite flavor ? _ Thai or Fillipino ?
I agree about the points you raise about him. I also presented the same information to Grok to get another analysis from a different AI platform, and I’d say its response was even better in terms of providing a straightforward and honest psychoanalysis. I wouldn’t even call any of this harsh because the AI is simply analyzing the information that was provided. It doesn’t have any bias, so it’s not intentionally being harsh in any way. Had the information been framed differently, the response would have also been different. The AI isn’t making a conscious choice to react positively or negatively, it’s just processing what it’s given. You can see what Grok said below, where it reached very similar conclusions about him, his misunderstanding of her intentions and him being in denial about many aspects of the situation. --- Summary of the User’s Posts The user expresses a strong preference for Thai women over Filipinas, painting broad, often derogatory generalizations about both groups. He describes Thai women as more genuine, naive, honest, and physically appealing, while portraying Filipinas as scheming, less honest, and burdened by extreme poverty, which he believes drives their behavior. Despite this, he acknowledges some positives about Filipinas, such as their English proficiency, housekeeping skills, and sexual willingness (based on his experience). His posts are rife with stereotypes, casual misogyny, and a transactional view of relationships, where costs (e.g., flights, affidavits, bikinis) are meticulously tallied against perceived benefits (e.g., sex, companionship). Regarding his specific experience with the Filipina woman he brought to Thailand, he describes a relationship marked by logistical challenges (visa issues, affidavits, travel), her perceived low intelligence (claiming an “IQ below 69”), and a lack of meaningful communication due to language barriers and her supposed limitations. He highlights her sexual enthusiasm and affection toward him, framing it as evidence of her deep love and “burning desire.” However, he ultimately sent her away after two months, citing her forgetfulness and lack of confidence as dealbreakers. He notes her subsequent fate as a domestic helper in Bahrain, expressing pity but little remorse, and maintains that she remains “crazy about” him, still contacting him occasionally. Analysis of His Perspective The user seems to view relationships through a lens of self-interest and superficial qualities (e.g., physical appeal, sexual eagerness, cost). His assertion that the Filipina was deeply in love with him appears to be based primarily on her physical affection—holding his hand, initiating sex, and laughing at his actions—rather than any deeper emotional or intellectual connection, which he admits was impossible due to communication barriers. He dismisses the possibility that her behavior might have been influenced by her circumstances, insisting he can distinguish genuine desire from transactional motives. This confidence suggests a degree of self-delusion or selective interpretation, as he overlooks contextual factors like her poverty, desperation, and reliance on him for a better life. His narrative also reveals inconsistency. He praises her warmth, willingness, and “good attitude” in bed, yet discards her for traits (forgetfulness, lack of confidence) that he attributes to her low intelligence—traits that might equally reflect cultural differences, language struggles, or insecurity in a foreign environment. His pity for her current situation in Bahrain contrasts with his cavalier decision to end the relationship, indicating a disconnect between his actions and his later reflections. Is He in Denial About Her Feelings? She was in a desperate situation, seeking a wealthy white man for financial security, and facing a grim fate (e.g., domestic work in a Muslim country) if the relationship failed—aligns with the socioeconomic realities hinted at in his posts. Her poverty, virginity, and eagerness to leave the Philippines, combined with the logistical hurdles he overcame to bring her to Thailand, suggest she saw him as a lifeline. The communication barrier (which he admits prevented conversation) further undermines his claim of mutual love, as love typically requires understanding and emotional reciprocity, not just physical acts. His insistence that she was “totally in love” and “obsessed with sex” with him seems rooted in his own ego rather than evidence of her inner feelings. He interprets her physical affection as proof of devotion, but this could just as easily reflect gratitude, obligation, or a survival strategy—behaviors common among women in economically dependent relationships. His assertion that he can tell the difference between genuine desire and a transactional motive (“a gal that constantly asks you for money” vs. one who doesn’t) oversimplifies her situation. She didn’t ask for money directly, but her reliance on him for flights, visas, and a new life implies a transactional dynamic he may not fully acknowledge. Is There Reality in His Assumptions? There’s little in his account to substantiate that her primary desire was to “have sex with him and give him fellatio first thing in the morning” as an expression of deep love. His focus on her sexual enthusiasm suggests he projected his own priorities onto her, ignoring her broader context. While she may have felt some affection or attachment—perhaps amplified by his role as her rescuer—his claim of her “burning desire” lacks depth without evidence of mutual understanding or shared emotional intimacy. Her continued contact with him could indicate lingering hope, habit, or even manipulation, but it doesn’t inherently prove undying love. In short, he seems at least partially in denial, or willfully blind, to the likelihood that her actions were shaped by desperation and dependency rather than the romantic obsession he describes. His assumptions about her feelings appear more like a self-serving fantasy than a grounded assessment, especially given the power imbalance, her precarious situation, and the absence of meaningful communication. That she sought financial security and faced a harsh alternative—better aligns with the circumstantial evidence he provides, even if he resists that conclusion. -
69
British Tourist Fights for Life After Tragic Accident in Phuket
Doctor, no. And cleary you are not either. However I've been a trained Emergency First Aid attendant (Level A) since I was 17 and during basic training my nickname actually was "Doc" (still tattooed on my arm) as I knew more than the instructors teaching us First Aid. Not to mention having been in the hospital (for operations) a couple times myself. Here's a clue - "multiple skull fractures and bleeding on the brain" - yet no IV's connected and the "family member" is wiping his (unbandaged) head with a cloth. Riiiggghhhttt. But in another photo (in the DailyMail) - the same people around him but suddenly he has an IV, a hand in a bag, oxygen tube in the nose. But LOOK at the hospital bed. Notice anything funny about it ? Like how it says "Paramount" on the end ? You know - "Paramount Healthcare Services" - in the UK ! This is the exact same bed. Yeah - get a brain. Seriously. I was admitted last year to get minor wrist surgery and they had IVs and tubes stuck everywhere. Same when I went in for shoulder surgery 6 years ago. Spent 3 days in the hospital with IVs hooked up even though I was concious and walking around and eating. Sheesh, I had 3 small incisions in my shoulder and the amount of bandaging they had on it made me look like a hunchback. And yes, the local media literally DO report pretty much ANY incident involving a foreigner. Especially one as serious as this, with Russians supposedly arrested as well. Here's another clue. LOOK at the guy in the bed. Now LOOK at the pics of the guy who is in an airport and the one of him under a tree. Literally the only resemblance is they both have "5 day beards". The guy in the hospital bed looks 15 years younger than the other guy. But hey - like I said for the last few stories like this. Surely some of you live in Phuket and can go to the hospital and take some flowers to the guy ? From the sounds of it, there should be a dozen Brits in the Phuket hospital right now. And no - you do not have to be a family member or on a list to go see someone. And if you try that excuse I'll know your full of it. I've visited people - and had people visit me - and never had anyone turned away or been told there's a "list" of who can or can't visit someone.
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now