Illegal Migrants Accused of Raping Kids Release in Sanctuary State of Massachusetts

[Social Media]

 

Massachusetts has come under scrutiny for its handling of illegal migrants accused of serious crimes, including child rape, as state policies prevent authorities from holding individuals on ICE detainers alone. The situation has led to a surge in federal immigration enforcement, with the Trump administration targeting the state for mass deportation operations.

 

Since 2017, Massachusetts laws have restricted local law enforcement from detaining illegal migrants solely based on requests from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). As a result, numerous individuals facing serious charges have been released back into the community. In response, Tom Homan, President Trump's border czar, announced a significant immigration raid in the state last week, which resulted in 270 arrests. "Most of them are significant criminals," Homan stated.

 

 

The issue has become more pressing due to cases where illegal migrants accused of child rape have been granted extremely low bail, making it easy for them to be released before ICE agents can intervene. Worcester County Sheriff Lewis Evangelidis voiced his frustration with the system, stating, “It’s very frustrating for me to know I might have a drug trafficker or a violent offender getting bailed out of here, and I call ICE, and they’re like, ‘We’re busy with a couple situations, we can’t get there for a few hours.’ I can’t hold them.” His jail has housed two individuals charged with child rape in the past six months, both of whom were released on just $500 bail. “Most people would not think that’s an appropriate bail,” Evangelidis added.

 

One of the suspects ICE eventually apprehended was Jose Fernando-Perez, a Guatemalan national who had been charged with three counts of child rape by force. He was released more than two years ago after posting a $7,500 bail and later arrested in Farmington, Massachusetts. Similarly, Stivenson Omar Perez-Ajtzalan, another Guatemalan national, was arrested by ICE in January after previously being charged with aggravated child rape and released on a $7,500 bond. Another suspect, Juan Alberto Rodezno-Marin from Honduras, had been released without bail in December despite being charged with indecent assault and battery and assault to rape.

 

Evangelidis noted that ICE detainer requests for his jail have significantly increased. “We’ve seen the detainers triple in the last three years. We were in the 30s a couple years ago. We exceeded 100 in 2024,” he said. “To me, that means there are more people illegally in the commonwealth committing crimes.”

 

Homan also underscored the gravity of the issue, stating last month that nine individuals accused of child rape had been released from Massachusetts jails before ICE could detain them. Among the 270 individuals apprehended last week, there were “6 foreign fugitives, including four who were wanted for murder or to serve a criminal sentence for murder, along with drug traffickers, child sexual predators, and numerous other violent public safety threats,” Homan said in a post on X.

 

The former ICE director condemned Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey and Boston Mayor Michelle Wu for supporting sanctuary policies, arguing that they endanger the public. “They should be ashamed of supporting sanctuary policies,” Homan said. “They would rather release these animals back into the community rather than honor ICE detainers or notify ICE when they are scheduled to be released.”

 

“Releasing public safety threats back into the public, rather than working with ICE at the jails, puts the public at great risk,” he added.

 

Based on a report by NYP  2025-03-26

 

 

[steven100]

all nasty individuals ...  deport and ban.

[Gsxrnz]

Yeah, but the loony lefties have dropped pedophile from their lexicon and now call these deviants pillars of society "Minor Attracted Persons". 

 

And that's how society goes to hell in a handcart tout de suite. 

[renaissanc]

Realistically, nothing will change there until (Heaven forbid!) the children of the state governor, mayors, and their cronies are raped, murdered, etc. Then the penny will drop. In any case Trump is going to get rid of sanctuary states and cities soon, which will infuriate the Democrat-Marxists and their supporters. "Poor rapists! We must be kind to them!"

[Yagoda]

And they make it rough for a decent American to defend themselves by exercising their constitutional rights to carry a firearm.

 

The Democrats in Massachusetts are anti American and hopefully the citizens of the state will toss these bums out, or move to greener pastures like they do in NY and Caliufornia

[safarimike11]

6 hours ago, Social Media said:

 

Massachusetts has come under scrutiny for its handling of illegal migrants accused of serious crimes, including child rape, as state policies prevent authorities from holding individuals on ICE detainers alone. The situation has led to a surge in federal immigration enforcement, with the Trump administration targeting the state for mass deportation operations.

 

Since 2017, Massachusetts laws have restricted local law enforcement from detaining illegal migrants solely based on requests from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). As a result, numerous individuals facing serious charges have been released back into the community. In response, Tom Homan, President Trump's border czar, announced a significant immigration raid in the state last week, which resulted in 270 arrests. "Most of them are significant criminals," Homan stated.

 

 

The issue has become more pressing due to cases where illegal migrants accused of child rape have been granted extremely low bail, making it easy for them to be released before ICE agents can intervene. Worcester County Sheriff Lewis Evangelidis voiced his frustration with the system, stating, “It’s very frustrating for me to know I might have a drug trafficker or a violent offender getting bailed out of here, and I call ICE, and they’re like, ‘We’re busy with a couple situations, we can’t get there for a few hours.’ I can’t hold them.” His jail has housed two individuals charged with child rape in the past six months, both of whom were released on just $500 bail. “Most people would not think that’s an appropriate bail,” Evangelidis added.

 

One of the suspects ICE eventually apprehended was Jose Fernando-Perez, a Guatemalan national who had been charged with three counts of child rape by force. He was released more than two years ago after posting a $7,500 bail and later arrested in Farmington, Massachusetts. Similarly, Stivenson Omar Perez-Ajtzalan, another Guatemalan national, was arrested by ICE in January after previously being charged with aggravated child rape and released on a $7,500 bond. Another suspect, Juan Alberto Rodezno-Marin from Honduras, had been released without bail in December despite being charged with indecent assault and battery and assault to rape.

 

Evangelidis noted that ICE detainer requests for his jail have significantly increased. “We’ve seen the detainers triple in the last three years. We were in the 30s a couple years ago. We exceeded 100 in 2024,” he said. “To me, that means there are more people illegally in the commonwealth committing crimes.”

 

Homan also underscored the gravity of the issue, stating last month that nine individuals accused of child rape had been released from Massachusetts jails before ICE could detain them. Among the 270 individuals apprehended last week, there were “6 foreign fugitives, including four who were wanted for murder or to serve a criminal sentence for murder, along with drug traffickers, child sexual predators, and numerous other violent public safety threats,” Homan said in a post on X.

 

The former ICE director condemned Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey and Boston Mayor Michelle Wu for supporting sanctuary policies, arguing that they endanger the public. “They should be ashamed of supporting sanctuary policies,” Homan said. “They would rather release these animals back into the community rather than honor ICE detainers or notify ICE when they are scheduled to be released.”

 

“Releasing public safety threats back into the public, rather than working with ICE at the jails, puts the public at great risk,” he added.

 

Based on a report by NYP  2025-03-26

 

 

Libtards still don't get it apparently.

[WDSmart]

Questions and remarks I have about these cases are:
1. Were the accusations for rapes done in the USA or the country they came from?
2. Have they been charged here in the USA for rape?
3. Almost everyone, no matter what the charge, even murder, is entitled to consideration of a bond. The bond increases with the severity of the charges. This is why I think in these cases of low bond, that these individuals were not charged with rape in the USA, but ICE is saying they have in the country they came from.
4. All of them, I assume, are only CHARGED with rape (either in the USA or their former country), but have not been tried so, in the USA, they are assumed to be innocent.
5. Like a lot of Trump's deportees, these people may have been suspected of something or even charged with it, but they have not been convicted of anything yet.

[safarimike11]

2 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

Questions and remarks I have about these cases are:
1. Were the accusations for rapes done in the USA or the country they came from?
2. Have they been charged here in the USA for rape?
3. Almost everyone, no matter what the charge, even murder, is entitled to consideration of a bond. The bond increases with the severity of the charges. This is why I think in these cases of low bond, that these individuals were not charged with rape in the USA, but ICE is saying they have in the country they came from.
4. All of them, I assume, are only CHARGED with rape (either in the USA or their former country), but have not been tried so, in the USA, they are assumed to be innocent.
5. Like a lot of Trump's deportees, these people may have been suspected of something or even charged with it, but they have not been convicted of anything yet.

Like I said above...

[Chomper Higgot]

There’s an easy fix for this.

 

Deport foreign criminals straight from prison.

 

It might upset the highly lucrative prison industry and stem the flow of donations it makes to politicians but it would save having to blame the police/courts.

 

 

[WDSmart]

1 minute ago, safarimike11 said:

Like I said above...

@safarimike11, What I am referring to in my previous comment could be found in just the first sentence of the article above:

"Massachusetts has come under scrutiny for its handling of illegal migrants accused of serious crimes, including child rape, as state policies prevent authorities from holding individuals on ICE detainers alone. "

Who is accusing these migrants of crimes? I think in these cases, it is ICE alone, based on some information they received from the migrant's former country. It is not an accusation of crimes committed in the USA, nor anything that has been proven in a court in the USA.

That's what I assume is true throughout the article.

[kingstonkid]

9 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

@safarimike11, What I am referring to in my previous comment could be found in just the first sentence of the article above:

"Massachusetts has come under scrutiny for its handling of illegal migrants accused of serious crimes, including child rape, as state policies prevent authorities from holding individuals on ICE detainers alone. "

Who is accusing these migrants of crimes? I think in these cases, it is ICE alone, based on some information they received from the migrant's former country. It is not an accusation of crimes committed in the USA, nor anything that has been proven in a court in the USA.

That's what I assume is true throughout the article.

You did not read the whole thing.  The only way you get bond is if you are arrested. IN THE USA

 

Forget about whether they are legal or illegal  DO you think that someone charged with multiple rape of under 14 should be walking the streets with no control

 

The bottom line is that these are people that have broken the law in the first place by being in the US illegally.  Now, they have compounded it by committing a crime and getting arrested.

 

I suppose also you think that MS13 and TDA are simply social cubs where people drink coffee and play tiffly winks

 

What should be done in your view

 

 

[Wrwest]

6 hours ago, steven100 said:

all nasty individuals ...  deport and ban.

Agree , following legal procedures.

[WDSmart]

17 minutes ago, kingstonkid said:

You did not read the whole thing.  The only way you get bond is if you are arrested. IN THE USA

 

Forget about whether they are legal or illegal  DO you think that someone charged with multiple rape of under 14 should be walking the streets with no control

 

The bottom line is that these are people that have broken the law in the first place by being in the US illegally.  Now, they have compounded it by committing a crime and getting arrested.

 

I suppose also you think that MS13 and TDA are simply social cubs where people drink coffee and play tiffly winks

 

What should be done in your view

 

 

I did read the whole thing. I didn't interpret what I read the way you did. I'll answer your questions above and comment in the order you listed them.

I do think EVERYONE, no matter what the charges are against them, should be assumed to be innocent and are eligible for a bond. That bond should be set according to the charges and the proof presented to the judge by the prosecuting attorney. IMO, the bond for people charged with rape of a child should be very high. But, as far as I can tell, these people are NOT accused of rape by a local community but are being charged with something else. ICE is the only agency accusing them with rape.

Yes, these people MAY HAVE broken the law by coming into the USA illegally, UNLESS they are REFUGEES. That is what they must do: go to court and present their case so a judge (or jury?) can decide if they are here illegally.

I had to look up "MS13" and "TDA," and now see they are criminal gangs in the USA (MS13) and other countries. I'm sure they are very nasty gangs, and anyone associated with them should be investigated. BUT, I don't think any agency can just assume someone is a member of one of those gangs without proof - and I don't believe tattoos are proof. A person could be a refugee fleeing a country that used to be a member of one of these gangs but is no longer.

In my view, as in all matters, the law should be followed when investigating, detaining, and ESPECIALLY in these cases, before deporting anyone.


 

[Oliver Holzerfilled]

40 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

Questions and remarks I have about these cases are:
1. Were the accusations for rapes done in the USA or the country they came from?
2. Have they been charged here in the USA for rape?
3. Almost everyone, no matter what the charge, even murder, is entitled to consideration of a bond. The bond increases with the severity of the charges. This is why I think in these cases of low bond, that these individuals were not charged with rape in the USA, but ICE is saying they have in the country they came from.
4. All of them, I assume, are only CHARGED with rape (either in the USA or their former country), but have not been tried so, in the USA, they are assumed to be innocent.
5. Like a lot of Trump's deportees, these people may have been suspected of something or even charged with it, but they have not been convicted of anything yet.

 

You were able to type all those words but somehow omit the five letter word "child" when the topic is child rape.  Why someone would do that is, for lack of a better word, curious. 

[WDSmart]

3 minutes ago, Oliver Holzerfilled said:

 

You were able to type all those words but somehow omit the five letter word "child" when the topic is child rape.  Why someone would do that is, for lack of a better word, curious. 

I don't consider rape (or murder) of a child any less of a crime than that of an adult. Do you? And if so, why?

[Cryingdick]

7 hours ago, WDSmart said:

Questions and remarks I have about these cases are:
1. Were the accusations for rapes done in the USA or the country they came from?
2. Have they been charged here in the USA for rape?
3. Almost everyone, no matter what the charge, even murder, is entitled to consideration of a bond. The bond increases with the severity of the charges. This is why I think in these cases of low bond, that these individuals were not charged with rape in the USA, but ICE is saying they have in the country they came from.
4. All of them, I assume, are only CHARGED with rape (either in the USA or their former country), but have not been tried so, in the USA, they are assumed to be innocent.
5. Like a lot of Trump's deportees, these people may have been suspected of something or even charged with it, but they have not been convicted of anything yet.

 

That's not quite how it works. If accused of a crime like that you would be extradited. What you wrote is so misguided and ignorant it is hard to know where to start. You are saying that any individual charged with rape either in the USA or abroad and has an active case should be allowed to remain in the USA? If they were convicted of rape in a foreign country they wouyldn't be eligible to be in the USA to begin with.

 

I guess you think people charged with rape are the epitome of a legitimate asylum claim and should be allowed to roam the streets indefinitely?

 

You should run for mayor somewhere in the USA. This is simply just moronic. That's a whole lot of warped thinking to make an excuse to keep rapists in the country.

[radiochaser]

8 hours ago, WDSmart said:

I don't consider rape (or murder) of a child any less of a crime than that of an adult. Do you? And if so, why?

You do not understand that a larger and stronger adult can physically overpower the child that he is raping?

 

You don't consider that rape of a child is less of a crime than the rape of an adult who is not physically incapacitated?

 

 

 

 

[hotsun]

8 hours ago, WDSmart said:

I don't consider rape (or murder) of a child any less of a crime than that of an adult. Do you? And if so, why?

Your thoughts are highly offensive. You must not have kids

[radiochaser]

8 hours ago, WDSmart said:

I don't consider rape (or murder) of a child any less of a crime than that of an adult. Do you? And if so, why?

 

4 minutes ago, hotsun said:

Your thoughts are highly offensive. You must not have kids

I have always thought it was worse.  

[hotsun]

1 minute ago, radiochaser said:

 

I have always thought it was worse.  

This guy lives in a bubble. No kids, only has had to ever worry about himself. Complete lack of consideration

[radiochaser]

2 minutes ago, hotsun said:

This guy lives in a bubble. No kids, only has had to ever worry about himself. Complete lack of consideration

The quality and content of his posts (not just in the thread but all the others too), displays the quality and content of his character!

[Tailwagsdog]

More all expenses paid holidays in El Salvador for these fine specimens of sub humans.

[georgegeorgia]

These people are "minor attracted people" 

They must receive counselling 

[WDSmart]

11 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

 

That's not quite how it works. If accused of a crime like that you would be extradited. What you wrote is so misguided and ignorant it is hard to know where to start. You are saying that any individual charged with rape either in the USA or abroad and has an active case should be allowed to remain in the USA? If they were convicted of rape in a foreign country they wouyldn't be eligible to be in the USA to begin with.

 

I guess you think people charged with rape are the epitome of a legitimate asylum claim and should be allowed to roam the streets indefinitely?

 

You should run for mayor somewhere in the USA. This is simply just moronic. That's a whole lot of warped thinking to make an excuse to keep rapists in the country.

The problem with all this is there are two different legal authorities implied. One is federal (ICE) and one is local (DA). I'll respond to you in the order of your comments:

If someone in the USA is accused of a crime committed in the USA, the DA should handle the case in accordance with the law. If the person is not a citizen of the USA, they should not be automatically extradited. A decision on that should be made after the outcome of their trial, and that decision would be made by ICE.
If, during their investigation of a non-citizen, ICE discovers they have an outstanding warrant in another country or even a conviction, this would be presented and considered as part of the person's application for US residency. If a non-citizen is denied residency, then they can be deported.

Any person charged with a crime, whether it be jaywalking, rape, or serial murders, committed in the USA the DA should handle the case in accordance with the law. If the judge at the preliminary hearing, after hearing the details of the case, decides to grant the accused bail, then that is the judge's prerogative. The judge, however, does not have the prerogative to order them to be deported.
Any person charged with a crime, whether it be jaywalking, rape, or serial murders, committed before they came to the USA, ICE would be present and consider that as part of the person's application for US residency. If a non-citizen is denied residency, then they can be deported.

I don't want to run for any office in the USA or anywhere else. I want to live the rest of my life in Thailand.
I don't want anyone CONVICTED of rape to go unpunished. However, I also don't want anyone only ACCUSED of rape to automatically be punished. They should be assumed to be innocent and have a right to a trial. 

[WDSmart]

9 hours ago, radiochaser said:

You do not understand that a larger and stronger adult can physically overpower the child that he is raping?

 

You don't consider that rape of a child is less of a crime than the rape of an adult who is not physically incapacitated?

 

 

 

 

I consider the rape of or any unprovocked assault on anyone a very serious crime regardless of the victim's age or physical capacity. 

[Bkk Brian]

Just now, WDSmart said:

I consider the rape of or any unprovocked assault on anyone a very serious crime regardless of the victim's age or physical capacity. 

There is a big difference in reality and law when a child is a victim. Why do you keep ignoring that fact

[WDSmart]

9 hours ago, hotsun said:

18 hours ago, WDSmart said:

I don't consider rape (or murder) of a child any less of a crime than that of an adult. Do you? And if so, why?

Your thoughts are highly offensive. You must not have kids

I consider the rape of or any unprovocked assault on anyone a very serious crime regardless of the victim's age or physical capacity.

My "thoughts" (comments) only offend you because you either misunderstand or disagree with them.
I have eight children (four natural, three adopted, and one foster child), but they are all adults now. I now have 12 grandkids (most are now adults), and three great-grandchildren. 

[Woke to Sounds]

The Homanator kicking axrse, ridding the good people of Mass of these sleazeballs.

 

Too bad the Cultural Marxist loonies in the Mass govt don't get it.

[WDSmart]

5 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

There is a big difference in reality and law when a child is a victim. Why do you keep ignoring that fact

There is no difference in my perception of reality between the rape of a child and the rape of an adult.
I am not a legal expert, and I couldn't find an absolute answer online about whether the laws differ in these different cases, so I am not ignoring anything. Both child and adult rape are serious crimes and should be punished. Whether one would result in more punishment than the other, I don't know. I would not be surprised that most people think the same way you do about this, so a jury might well recommend a more severe penalty for child rape than the rape of an adult. Whether a judge would is more uncertain. I can only say that I think both are serious crimes and that they should be punished. 

[Bkk Brian]

Just now, WDSmart said:

There is no difference in my perception of reality between the rape of a child and the rape of an adult.
I am not a legal expert, and I couldn't find an absolute answer online about whether the laws differ in these different cases, so I am not ignoring anything. Both child and adult rape are serious crimes and should be punished. Whether one would result in more punishment than the other, I don't know. I would not be surprised that most people think the same way you do about this, so a jury might well recommend a more severe penalty for child rape than the rape of an adult. Whether a judge would is more uncertain. I can only say that I think both are serious crimes and that they should be punished. 

Then your perception is very wrong morally and against all international law. Quite disgusting