Jump to content

Trump Warns Israel Would Lead Strike if Iran Refuses to Abandon Nuclear Ambitions


Recommended Posts

Posted
35 minutes ago, johng said:

Why can certain countries have nuclear weapons but not others ?

Because the first 5 got there first and are the original famous five permanent security council members.

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

If only there was a treaty with Iran not to produce nuclear weapons.

 

 

Crikey, looks like we’ve got Neville Chamberlin on the forum now; whatever next ¯\_()_/¯

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, johng said:

Why can certain countries have nuclear weapons but not others ?

 

My question was to another poster in response to their comment, and was specifically asking if they thought it was acceptable for Iran to have nuclear weapons; it was not about any other, or certain countries.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

 

Crikey, looks like we’ve got Neville Chamberlin on the forum now; whatever next ¯\_()_/¯

 

 


You obviously missed some history classes.

 

Neville Chamberlin didn’t unilaterally withdraw from any treaties.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, johng said:

less people will freeze to death ?plant life will love it..and maybe the dinosaurs 🦕 will make a come back

they seemed to do ok with higher temperature and carbon dioxide levels...before something wiped them out...(wasn't Trump)

A very possible scenario in the post-human world and it well may be Trump ruining yet another effort in his dotage.

Posted
3 hours ago, billd766 said:

Ask yourself why it is OK for Israel to have nuclear weapons but no no other country in the region is allowed to have them?

 

Not sure if you are just being a contrarian, or if you have simply not followed events in the middle east for the last 30 years or more; so just a little edification. Iran have been threatening to wipe Israel from the face of the earth for many years. These threats were made repeatedly by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad between 2005 and 2013 when he was President of Iran, and have just been repeated by General Ebrahim Jabbari, who has said "Operation True Promise 3 will be carried out. (True promises 1 & 2 were April 2024 & October 2024 respectively)

 

In April 2024 Iran launched, in an unprovoked attack, 170 drones, over 30 cruise missiles, and more than 120 ballistic missiles, indiscriminately at Israeli territory; then on 1st October 2024 Iran launched 200 ballistic missiles at Israeli territory, again indiscriminately, not targeting military installations. 

 

I wonder if you can guess what might happen to Israel if Iran acquired nuclear weapons, which you seem to be advocating; I guess it's because  you are an antisemite and a Hamas apologist, so the obvious eventuality would probably not bother you one jot.

 

There has been no verification that Israel has nuclear weapons, although I think it more likely than not.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Agree 2
Posted
9 hours ago, wombat said:

Like waving a red flag at a bull.

By the same token I don't want a dirty bomb made from Iran enriched Plutonium In the hands of a jihadi which is not only my greatest fear but a distinct possibility 

When you expect that danger is bigger: tomorrow, of.. when Iran gets 5 years the time to develop much more nuclear technology ?

One thing for sure: I do NOT trust the Westerners hating Iranian Ayatollas and their followers

  • Confused 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

The tooth fairy may be a more reliable choice than a criminal sociopath in the White House.

 

 its just a slogan occasionally trotted out for political messaging 

 

I rest my case, :clap2:

It's  like asking your dog if it "wants " a treat.. just to watch it start drooling, associate any topic with Trump &  out come the tail waggers 100% guaranteed. 

 

Congratulations being  easy to illicit a meaningless response. Does making such claims change anything ? nope. Mean anything ? nope.... Get a knee jerk response ? yup .. & thats all its intended to achieve,  an instant reaction nothing more.. Well done 

 

As for Nukes, they are another tool used for fear and to control a narrative by use of  language, MAD etc or some other media headline are trotted out with the simple message.. be afraid & mistrust  "THEM"  but we are the good guys . . of course you are... depending where you live  ...:whistling:

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
Posted
1 hour ago, cjinchiangrai said:

And Trump is a sociopath regardless of where you live. Do not expect him to honor the UK any more than Greenland. He is going to betray you to Putin in the end and the global economy is being trashed, not just the US. Between the corruption and the incompetence this is not going to end well for anyone but Putin.

 

Stop your tail wagging, Trump i couldnt care about apart from the entertainment value which i admit is hilarious .. or Putin who is not so funny. They are just talking heads &  as im not wedded to  any political ideology or nationalism I dont fuss about it or the global economy. its  all just a circus show anyway. Let the media political pearl clutchers & fools  waste their time if they like,not me thanks, got life to live which is much more fun and productive. 

 

PS Check your blood pressure regular m8 .Trump  living rent free in your head  & for another 3 yrs 9 moth  could be   unhealthy  :wai:

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 2
  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
17 hours ago, FritsSikkink said:

USA bullying and looking for more wars again.

 

The USA is not bullying anyone. it is attempting to prevent the unnecessary loss of life. Iran's mullahs have previously threatened to attack other countries. As a reminder, Iran attempted to  murder President Trump several times.

 

13 hours ago, Zaphod Priest said:

Or possibly looking for Armageddon.

 

More like trying to avoid Armageddon.

 

12 hours ago, This Guy said:

USA and Israel threatening a sovereign nation....who would have guessed.

Not threatening anyone. Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism. They are acting to protect themselves against the world's principal supporter of terrorism. As a reminder, Iran sent its Republican Guards and proxy army  Hezbollah to prop up Assad's horrible regime. The end result was 600,000 war dead, and 14 million+ refugees Iran has supported Yemen's Houthis in its overthrow of the legitimate government of Yemen and the subsequent war with the KSA. The result has been 400,000 dead, 4.5 million refugees and a nation in the grips of  famine.

 

9 hours ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Not a good idea to telegraph war plans, especially for other countries. What if Iran attacks first? Or Russia?

 

They are warning Iran  that there will be consequences of building nuclear weapons. Iran has already  attacked first through its proxy armies, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthis etc.

 

9 hours ago, johng said:

 

According to the IAEA  Iran is in full compliance  it does not posses nuclear weapons at the moment  but could do in a short time    however that would be very difficult to achieve without throwing out the IAEA inspectors first...so when they throw out the inspectors  is time to worry  and Israel and US have a few weeks to launch their own low yield nuclear first strike against Iran's enrichment facilities...and then.......??????

 

Really? Please provide a reference to "full compliance", because the report says different.   The IAEA last  report  states that it has not visited some Iranian nuclear reactors in 4 years. The report goes into details on the lack of compliance and details multiple concerns that indicate the opposite of what you claim. How can you say that the IAEA has said there is full compliance when the report says the exact opposite?    https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/24/11/gov2024-61.pdf

 

Page 4: C.1. Verification and monitoring of Iran’s nuclear-related commitments - Other Reactors Unavailable (unverified)  since February 2021

 

Page 8:  Since 16 February 2021, the Agency has not been able to verify Iran’s total enriched uranium stockpile precisely on any given day, needing to rely instead on a small proportion of the total being based on Iran’s estimates.

 

Page 10: Iran’s decision to remove all of the Agency’s equipment previously installed in Iran for JCPOA-related surveillance and monitoring activities has also had detrimental implications for the Agency’s ability to provide assurance of the peaceful nature of Iran’s nuclear programme.

 It has also been more than three and a half years since Iran stopped provisionally applying its Additional Protocol. Therefore, throughout this period, Iran has not provided updated declarations and the Agency has not been able to conduct complementary access to any sites and other locations in Iran. The production and accumulation of high enriched uranium by Iran, the only non-nuclear weapon State to do so, adds to the Agency’s concerns. 

 

Your comment about throwing out inspectors is laughable, since  many have already  been forced to leave and none  have been inspecting for months. Whenever an inspector finds something, Iran bans the inspector blocking follow up an dfurther investigation.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/return-barred-inspectors-iran-unlikely-iaea-chief-says-ship-has-sailed-2024-09-25/

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Sad 3
Posted
19 hours ago, Social Media said:

“Israel will obviously be very much involved in that. They’ll be the leader of that. But nobody leads us, but we do what we want to do.”

 

The incoherent ramblings of this old fool become more demented and illogical by the day.

 

If I would not know, that the Americans are really strongly against being led by some old and deranged guy with dementia, I would think we have a blooming case of it right in front of our eyes?!

 

But if it is not dementia, maybe it is collective daddy issues of the US electorate -- you know, they secretly long for the weird smelly uncle getting much too touchy-feely when drunk during a family BBQ, telling all his wisdoms about taxes, foreigners and all the other bad influences around.

  • Confused 1
Posted
10 hours ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Not a good idea to telegraph war plans, especially for other countries. What if Iran attacks first? Or Russia?

 

Trump has proven now many times that he is a dog that barks but has no bite (and even in this case wants others to fight and do the dirty work for him -- the face of Netanyahu looked like he was sucking on a lemon during the Oval Office interview).

 

This alone will prevent the others attacking prematurely... and the US will implode under the weight of his dumbness all by itself, just give it a little time.

 

I privately think that China is actually increasing its military with a plan, but it is not Taiwan: I would guess the true direction of their expansion will be Siberia with all its natural resources. So they just need to kick the ball along for a little while more, confusing everybody with their anti-Taiwan rethoric. But I think they plan already the next step ahead: after they have gotten the ressources they need for true industrial expansion from Siberia and the USA has neutered itself, Taiwan will not even need to be invaded, as they will be standing alone and naked in the rain.

 

Not a happy scenario at all, but American idiocy has made a fairly stable world with three superpowers keeping each other in check nearly impossible, so we will see a hard reset to a different stable situation, with the USA having taken themselves out of the game and Russia havign proven to the world that they are not being able to usurp more than a few farmers villages per month.

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
14 hours ago, renaissanc said:

To those here who call the US a bully and sympathise with the mad mullahs with their nuclear war bunkers, ask yourselves: If Iran manages to produce nuclear weapons, would they use them? If they use them, what will happen to mankind? You are a part of mankind, remember. Maybe it's better to prevent the mad mullahs from producing nuclear weapons.

Iran will be able to make few nukes compared to the west. If Iran used them, there would be little left of Iran, and most of the West will be untouched.

The mullahs may be unpleasant people, but they are not mad.

 

Seems Trump is not the only western person that loses their common sense when it comes to the  M E.

 

PS, even if they used a dirty bomb in a western city, the origin can, I believe, be ascertained by the scientists, and if from Iran see my first sentence.

 

Let's not forget that Iran isn't the only non western country to have nukes.

  • Agree 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...