Jump to content

US Expat in Thailand Faces 10 Years for Threatening US Senator


Recommended Posts

Posted
15 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

Untitled-design-2025-04-11T152101.838.jpg

Photo courtesy of The Hill

 

In a troubling case intertwining political fervour and unlawful threats, Eric Charles Welton, a 53-year-old American living in Thailand, is facing up to 10 years in a US federal prison. This follows his reported admission to making death threats against US Senator Thom Tillis and his staff, spurred by frustrations over repetitive political emails.

 

According to the US Department of Justice, Welton has pleaded guilty to charges of threatening a federal official in connection with their duties. His sentencing is set for July, where he could face a substantial prison term for his actions.

 

The alarming saga unfolded with a series of aggressive phone calls. In September 2021, tensions peaked when Welton contacted Senator Tillis’s office in Raleigh, North Carolina, making vivid and violent threats. Among his menacing remarks, he reportedly threatened to “put a bullet through each of [their] heads” and “mow down” the entire state, prompted by dissatisfaction over unsolicited emails.

 

 

 

Daniel Bubar, Acting US Attorney, condemned Welton’s actions as both “despicable” and an “affront to our democratic system.” FBI Special Agent Robert DeWitt highlighted the severity of the threats, noting that such behaviour aims to erode democracy and will not be tolerated.

 

Senator Tillis, a Republican who has been subject to increased threats amid political tensions of the Trump era, has been proactive in countering intimidation. His office, releasing audio clips of threatening messages, pledged to take legal action against any attempts to target him or his team.

 

On April 10, Tillis's office expressed gratitude to law enforcement for their diligence and stressed the importance of accountability in an era where hostility towards public servants is becoming alarmingly common. Welton’s case serves as a stark reminder of the severe consequences tied to making violent threats against public officials, regardless of the motive behind them, reported The Thaiger.

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

-- 2025-04-11

 

image.png

 

image.jpeg

He's a case for a mad house than prison. Anyway not the brightest candle at all

  • Like 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, Iron Tongue said:

Really?

Perhaps you should review the dissolution of democratic rights rights in the EU.  

Simply expressing disagreement with the govt can now earn jailtime and national censorship.  Or you don't think what's happening in the UK, Germany, and France counts?

 

And you aren't aware of how democracy is alive in the US?  Didn't Trump just get (re)elected and sworn-in as President "47?  

 

 

Found the fredumb<deleted>er. Only MAGA I support is "Make Americans Go Away". 

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
14 hours ago, jvs said:

How do you take pornography out of schools?

Good question. When I was a kid at school in the late 1940s/early 1950s black and white, postcard size porn  pics imported from France were widely circulated. The idea that youngsters have only recently become exposed to porn is nonsense.

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 2
Posted

I do not support the US making any rulings on anyone for their views, BUT... if there were actual threats involved, I do support rulings in that case.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

Update:  Some serious backtracking going on!

 

"Chairman of the House Committee on Military Affairs Wiroj Lakkhanaadisorn (People's Party) said on Friday the Third Army Region may not have been careful in lodging a lese majeste complaint with police which led to the arrest and brief detention of American scholar Paul Chambers earlier this week.
He said the matter may affect bilateral ties with an important nation that has a huge trade relations with Thailand at a critical junction when it's not even apparent what alleged royal insult Chambers had committed. The committee is thus summoning generals from the Third Army Region to clarify to the committee on April 24." (Khaosod)

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

I guess the "pornography' question depends on how you define "pornography."  Dictionary.com defines it as "sexually explicit videos, photographs, writings, or the like, whose purpose is to elicit sexual arousal."   https://www.dictionary.com/browse/pornography          There seem to be lots of other "definitions" floating around.  A lot of people seem to use words the same way that other people who hold the same beliefs as they do, without actually bothering to locate the real meaning.  Ignorance is a contagious social disease, and it's rampant in the U.S. 

  • Confused 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

Good question. When I was a kid at school in the late 1940s/early 1950s black and white, postcard size porn  pics imported from France were widely circulated. The idea that youngsters have only recently become exposed to porn is nonsense.

Interesting. Thanks for enlightening me. I had never heard before that the schools circulated pornography to the school children before, as they do now and even assign homework with pornographic books to children. I guess I hadn't kept up with the reality of the situation in thinking that school districts in the past didn't impose pornographic materials into the curricula making it, in some cases, required reading of the students, as some school districts have been revealed to have been doing lately. But, even if school officials or teachers widely circulated pornographic postcard sized pics to students in the 40's and 50's, I think you'll find that there is a MASSIVE difference between that and the pornography that the teachers and school districts have assigned to schools these days, with very explicitly graphic stories, with pictures. In particular, they prefer to promote homosexual pornography and to even explicitly encourage the students to explore for themselves what they are learning in the assigned homework. The kind of stuff you mention from the 40's and 50's is like kindergarten level compared to post grad university level pornography. Although, I admit that I had not heard of schools widely circulating pornography to their students in the 40's and 50's, I have EXTREME doubts that it bore any resemblance to the kind of pornography being assigned to students in these recent times.
Sorry to say that I also doubt your version of events, unless you are meaning to say that kids got their hands on these pictures and passed them among themselves, that it wasn't from the schools. Of course, that sort of thing has likely been going on for millennia. But that isn't the issue and nobody is arguing or doubting that. That's why I took it that you were comparing apples to apples and meant that pornography was being distributed by the schools back then too and not making a vain attempt to compare apples to oranges.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




  • Topics

  • Popular Contributors

  • Latest posts...

    1. 0

      Bachelor’s degree in the Philippines

    2. 134

      Trump spares smartphones, computers, other electronics from China tariffs

    3. 50

      The 30+30+30 leasing contacts in Phuket is over

    4. 90

      British Fugitive Arrested in Phuket After Violent Brawl in Bangkok

    5. 134

      Trump spares smartphones, computers, other electronics from China tariffs

    6. 3

      Superficies or Usufruct

  • Popular in The Pub

×
×
  • Create New...