Jump to content

Nestlé Wins Legal Battle Over Nescafé Rights in Thailand


Recommended Posts

Posted

That stuff is vile.  Switch to Moccona, Birdy, Super ... anything but that.  Prefer their Hazelnut flavored when making a pitstop at 7-11 when O&A ... tasty stuff

 

image.png.7500d9e9c39a766debd85f896dea4421.pngimage.png.b98caf1869472428e6cc994b64b4e79d.png

  • Confused 3
  • Sad 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

 

What Thailand is now selling in Nescafe boxes, at higher prices, isn't real Nescafe. It's powdery like old time instant coffee.  

 

So will they lower the price if real Nescafe comes back?

 

Real Nescafe:

Screenshotfrom2025-04-1408-29-13.png.44ce5a279b2f08fd6080d4e2a875d4a0.png

Posted

Only Decaf for me these days, I go out to Starbucks 3 times a week that is about the best so far, Amazon dont do Decaf or 7/11, I would have thought the amount of coffee they sell daily they would have Decaf, maybe it's to expensive for them to buy, not many people want it, 

  • Sad 3
Posted
3 hours ago, Purdey said:

Decaf is like whisky without the alcohol. 

 

It's more like light beer.  I love a cuppa, but I can only drink one a day.  Decaf still gives me the jolt, but I get to drink several before the nerves protrude from my fingertips.

 

  • Agree 2
Posted
12 hours ago, Georgealbert said:

The ruling follows a long-standing dispute between Nestlé and the Mahagitsiri family, who co-founded Quality Coffee Products Co., Ltd. (QCP) in 1990.

 

That is one family you do not want to be fighting with in Thailand.

  • Confused 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, BKKBike09 said:

That is one family you do not want to be fighting with in Thailand.

 

I've got this vision of Nestle winning the battle and losing the war.  Like, for example, if they get rights to the Nescafe brand, but no Thai outlets will stock it on their shelves.  Because they don't want to mess with the family.

 

We'll see...

 

  • Confused 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, ukrules said:

What were they thinking? Did they actually think they could get away with stealing the name of one of the largest brands on earth?

Well they got away with it with Carlsberg...

  • Confused 1
Posted
4 hours ago, impulse said:

 

I've got this vision of Nestle winning the battle and losing the war.  Like, for example, if they get rights to the Nescafe brand, but no Thai outlets will stock it on their shelves.  Because they don't want to mess with the family.

 

We'll see...

 

"No Thai outlets"?  All outlets in Thailand are Thai.

Posted
4 hours ago, Mr Meeseeks said:

Similar things have happened to many Western brands, Pepsi, Carlsberg etc

Many similar things?  Etc.?  Huh?  You mean one western brand.  Nescafe won.

Posted
2 hours ago, JAG said:
3 hours ago, ukrules said:

What were they thinking? Did they actually think they could get away with stealing the name of one of the largest brands on earth?

Well they got away with it with Carlsberg...

Who got away with what?  Entirely different circumstances...Carlsberg was not stolen by a Thai company.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

"No Thai outlets"?  All outlets in Thailand are Thai.

 

True.  And I believe that a powerful family could get 7/11, Lotus, Tops and all the other "Thai outlets" to give Nescafe zero shelf space if they want to carry the rest of that powerful family's products.  So Nestle would have the rights to the name, but zero chance of selling any in LOS.

 

Whether that will happen or not remains to be seen.  I don't claim to know what it will look like, but I'm predicting Nestle will take it in the shorts in Thailand.  Winning the battle and losing the war.  Like Pepsico did.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, impulse said:

Nestle will take it in the shorts in Thailand.  Winning the battle and losing the war.  Like Pepsico did.

What, along the same lines as Nestle debacle, are you claiming happened to Pepsico?

  • Confused 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

What, along the same lines as Nestle debacle, are you claiming happened to Pepsico?

 EST.

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Mr Meeseeks said:

With Pepsi they stopped bottling the stuff at the bottling plants, breaking their agreement with their local distributors, thus stopping the supply.

They then used the bottling plants and distribution network to try to push their own cheap cola EST, which by no coincidence has the same colour logos as Pepsi. I believe that they gently 'encouraged' retailers not to stock Pepsi but stock their cheap cola alternative instead.

You really think that Pepsi is not widely available in Thailand?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...