Jump to content

Nestlé Brews Up Battle in Thai Coffee Market Amid Legal Dispute


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, DaRoadrunner said:

On a related subject. Has anyone found a coffee that is guaranteed to be mold free? Coffee beans being known for this contaminant.

Never had a problem with Bon Cafe beans. I use Dubai Esspresso, pale green label from Makro only, sofar as I know.

I never buy Nestlé products, since coming here.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

Who drinks this horrible concoction that even calls itself coffee? Certainly no one who knows what real coffee tastes like! The package should say "May contain traces of coffee.":post-4641-1156694572:

  • Haha 1
Posted

Buy Vietnamese coffee.

 

Nestle and the other big coffee movers and shakers have tried forever to enter that market but have struggled.

Posted
17 hours ago, Will B Good said:

Don't like coffee, but going to start drinking Nestle now.

 

Love Nescafe Red Cup!

  • Heart-broken 1
Posted
1 hour ago, hotchilli said:

Over priced and over here...

 

Actually - from memory, (pre 2015) the price of Nescafe Red Cup compared very favourably with its equivalent in the UK, Nescafe granules - in fact, considerably cheaper.

Posted
1 hour ago, Tropicalevo said:

Yes really.

They are by far way down the list of immoral and evil companies on the planet.

 

If you look at the next line in my post, you see why.

I have no fondness for Nestlé, but I do support fairness in business.

 

They are by far way down the list of immoral and evil companies on the planet.

Maybe you should read up on this evil corporation, especially on their actions in 'The Baby Formula Scandal'.

https://utopia.org/guide/crime-controversy-nestles-5-biggest-scandals-explained/

 

From the link:

Baby formula is one of the biggest and most controversial of all Nestlé products.

Since the company’s conception in 1867, Nestlé has convinced people its baby formula is better for infants than breast milk — a claim that is categorically false. They placed particular focus on marketing in developing countries in Africa, Latin America and Asia during the 1970s, sending saleswomen dressed as nurses to convince the mothers that their formula was better for their children than their own breast milk.

Many women, struggling to afford the expensive milk touted as better than what their bodies produced for free, diluted the formula with (often unsanitary) water, further reducing its nutritional value. Millions of infants died. Many more grew up nutritionally deficient, dramatically impacting the health and lifespan of swathes of the developing world — one of the worst scandals a corporation has ever publicly faced. Meanwhile, the company pocketed billions in revenue from baby formula and continues to do so. 

It’s worth pointing out that some women cannot breastfeed, and baby formula, when prepared correctly, is an adequate substitute for breast milk. However, Nestlé exploited women by forcefully deceiving millions regarding its superiority over breast milk. It failed to educate people about proper preparation and even paid off doctors and hospitals to bolster its bogus claims. 

Today, the misconception lives on, and baby formula remains a booming market. Despite global outrage now lasting half a century, as well as tons of new research into the harm caused by Nestlé baby formula and other Nestlé products, infant formula remains an $11.5-billion market — and growing. 

 

but I do support fairness in business.

And when have they ever been fair in business?

 

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
19 minutes ago, Bert got kinky said:

 

They are by far way down the list of immoral and evil companies on the planet.

Maybe you should read up on this evil corporation, especially on their actions in 'The Baby Formula Scandal'.

https://utopia.org/guide/crime-controversy-nestles-5-biggest-scandals-explained/

 

From the link:

Baby formula is one of the biggest and most controversial of all Nestlé products.

Since the company’s conception in 1867, Nestlé has convinced people its baby formula is better for infants than breast milk — a claim that is categorically false. They placed particular focus on marketing in developing countries in Africa, Latin America and Asia during the 1970s, sending saleswomen dressed as nurses to convince the mothers that their formula was better for their children than their own breast milk.

Many women, struggling to afford the expensive milk touted as better than what their bodies produced for free, diluted the formula with (often unsanitary) water, further reducing its nutritional value. Millions of infants died. Many more grew up nutritionally deficient, dramatically impacting the health and lifespan of swathes of the developing world — one of the worst scandals a corporation has ever publicly faced. Meanwhile, the company pocketed billions in revenue from baby formula and continues to do so. 

It’s worth pointing out that some women cannot breastfeed, and baby formula, when prepared correctly, is an adequate substitute for breast milk. However, Nestlé exploited women by forcefully deceiving millions regarding its superiority over breast milk. It failed to educate people about proper preparation and even paid off doctors and hospitals to bolster its bogus claims. 

Today, the misconception lives on, and baby formula remains a booming market. Despite global outrage now lasting half a century, as well as tons of new research into the harm caused by Nestlé baby formula and other Nestlé products, infant formula remains an $11.5-billion market — and growing. 

 

but I do support fairness in business.

And when have they ever been fair in business?

 

 

I should also add that in developing countries, Nestlé gave their baby formula the new mothers for free of charge, just for long enough for the mothers to stop producing breast milk, forcing them to have to pay for baby formula.

They did this knowing that in most cases the mothers could not afford to pay for the formula and they did not have access to uncontaminated water to mix the formula with.

 

Posted
3 hours ago, CallumWK said:

I have no horse in the game, but I have avoided any Nestle product for as long as I remember, and especially since the CEO of Nestle Mr Brabeck-Letmathe said that “access to water is not a public right”

 

 

Yes, now that you mention it, but are you aware that this figure was appointed this week as a temporary replacement for the president of the WEF?
That also says it all, I think.

Posted
2 hours ago, hotchilli said:

Over priced and over here...

Overpriced? This week I was in the Makro, Moccona is more than 30% more expensive.

 

2 hours ago, Tropicalevo said:

I do not drink Nestlé, but I do wish them well in this little enterprise.

If Thailand wants overseas investment and to trade with western businesses, they must learn to treat them fairly.

(I drink Chiang Rai coffee.  :thumbsup:)

There I have little hope that Thailand will allow it, how about Aldi and Lidl, with that they are throwing up their own glasses, not going to happen.
Incidentally, I have noticed that many foreign companies are now all Thai-owned, think Lotus, Makro and many others.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, PJUK88 said:

Disgusting product. Calling it coffee is a slander to real coffee.

It's a matter of taste,  used an expresso machine here for years but stopped using it because I can't get good coffee here, there used to be expresso from DE but after covid no longer available, and do you know what I drink now? Instant coffee from Nestlé.

Posted
47 minutes ago, Peterphuket said:

It's a matter of taste,  used an expresso machine here for years but stopped using it because I can't get good coffee here, there used to be expresso from DE but after covid no longer available, and do you know what I drink now? Instant coffee from Nestlé.

I don't know how wide a variation there is, but all of the Thai coffee I've ever drunk has been fabulous. I'm drinking my triple latte as I sit here. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
54 minutes ago, Peterphuket said:

Overpriced? This week I was in the Makro, Moccona is more than 30% more expensive.

 

There I have little hope that Thailand will allow it, how about Aldi and Lidl, with that they are throwing up their own glasses, not going to happen.
Incidentally, I have noticed that many foreign companies are now all Thai-owned, think Lotus, Makro and many others.

In the case of 7-11, the parent company is, I believe in Japan, the Thai business is a subsidiary owned and run independently. I imagine this is a common model. 

Posted
4 hours ago, CallumWK said:

I have no horse in the game, but I have avoided any Nestle product for as long as I remember, and especially since the CEO of Nestle Mr Brabeck-Letmathe said that “access to water is not a public right”

 

 

The ceo of Nestle, who has just taken over the chairmanship of the WEF as well. Should be a warning of things to come.

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...