Fun Quiz > Covid-19 mRNA Vax harm denial - At which stage are you?

[richard_smith237]

1 hour ago, Mark Nothing said:

We also have an ethereal power ready to be accessed and used on demand.

 

I suspect there may be a few dyslexics on this forum with prostate issues keen to improve their urethral power... 

[rattlesnake]

9 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

However, from a medical standpoint, he remains unqualified, lacking the necessary training to make authoritative judgements in this field - particularly when he dismisses vaccines in favour of “terrain optimisation.”

 

Okay, so let's go back to Dr. Redfield, who, according to your criteria, is fully qualified and credible with regards to the Covid vaccines and their effectiveness (or lack thereof). This is the last thing you said about him, in thread Anti-vaxers relying on discredited doctor's claims about COVID vaccines... again!, on May 15:

 

However, while Dr. Redfield has raised concerns about vaccine side effects, there is no verifiable evidence that he has claimed "Long Covid" is a cover-up for mRNA vaccine injuries. Reports making such claims often originate from sources that may not adhere to rigorous journalistic standards. Mainstream scientific consensus maintains that Long Covid is a legitimate condition resulting from COVID-19 infection, characterised by a range of symptoms persisting after the acute phase of the illness.

 

In summary, Dr. Redfield has voiced concerns about vaccine mandates and the need for transparency regarding vaccine side effects. However, attributing statements to him that Long Covid is a cover-up for vaccine injuries lacks substantiation from credible sources.

 

 

At the time, you did not address my reply to this post of yours in that thread. I am adding it below for your convenience, and ask you, in the name of your rigorous scientific criteria, to kindly give your opinion clearly regarding Dr. Redfield's statements:

 

 

46:40:
"I don't think the vaccine industry should have immunity. I think they should have responsibility like any other manufacturer of any other product for their product and I'm particularly concerned about this now because, you know, my clinical practice right now which I'm still in two half days a week, is largely Covid and Long Covid, but among my, quote, "Long Covid" patients are people that don't have long covid but they have mRNA vaccine injury, right, and there's not a clear path for them to have their injury recognized…"

 

Now put this into perspective with what he stated during a Senate hearing last year: he does not administer the mRNA shots in his own practice because he believes the Spike proteins they contain are “toxic to the body” and "the mRNA was persisting much longer than it should" in some patients. He confirmed it crosses the blood-brain barrier and that the jabs don't prevent infection and have side effects which were hidden by the authorities.

 

https://rumble.com/v56ws2r-sen.-ron-johnson-with-cdc-former-cdc-director-dr.-robert-redfield.html

[Red Phoenix]

16 hours ago, dinsdale said:

16 hours ago, frank83628 said:

Perhaps those with previous illness should have had the vax and isolated and leave the healthy to continue as normal

 

This is precisely what should have happened. It didn't because money was the prime motive. Not health care.

 

What you are advocating here (isolation of the vulnerable, and let the world continue as normal) was the proposed approach in the Great Barrington Declaration.  Despite hundred of thousands endorsements, that at first glance sensible - basically protect the vulnerable and create herd-immunity - approach was 'killed' by a mob of hysterics fearful of the Big Bad Virus, led by the evil Big Pharma cronies Collins and Fauci. 

At the time (October 2020) I signed that declaration.  Not because I was fearful of Covid-19 ('cases' were fraudulently boosted to increase the scare-factor, and actual figures showed that there was no global pandemic).  But I signed it because it was a far better alternative than the ridiculous one-size-fits-all mitigation measures that were to be forced on everybody, and were actually meant to pave the way for the disastrous 'vax-solution'. 

On hindsight I should not have signed that Great Barrington Declaration (even though it didn't make a difference), as even at the time I did not believe in its faulty premises.  But it was a choice for the lesser evil...

 

Prof dr Norman FENTON expressed this as follows: 

Also, unlike almost every other public covid dissident (“permitted” or otherwise presumably genuine) I refused to sign the widely acclaimed Great Barrington Declaration in October 2020. There were two reasons for this:

1. Even then, I did not believe there was a major pandemic; the GBD assumed there was.

2. Even if there was a major pandemic, I was repulsed by the idea that anybody should be forced into a lockdown. The GBD was recommending “targeted protection” for “the elderly and infirm”. So, while the GBD was asserting that the young and healthy should be allowed to to go about their lives as normal, it was also asserting that the elderly and infirm should be locked down even if it was against their will.

[frank83628]

Excess deaths since vaccine roll out are higher than ever before..... wonder what could be the cause

[SAFETY FIRST]

10 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

I am not "bothering you", just don't answer this and everything will be OK

This is the bloody exact reason I don't interact on AN forums.

You say you are not bothering me, I said you were.

How the bloody hell can you say this, these are signs of narcissism. 

 

I will make comment to the OP or article but that's it, I very, very seldom get into conversation, most here are just looking for an argument 

 

Now leave me alone 

[SAFETY FIRST]

14 hours ago, dinsdale said:

15 hours ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

Again, you're OFF TOPIC.

I'm not here for an argument. I choose not to interact.

 

Google is your friend, google can help you?

 

I'm responding to your comment therefore it must be your comment that's OFF TOPIC

You're talking infant cancer, I know nothing about this subject, I DON'T want to get into conversation. 

 

I know with my regular exercise, eating 3 to 5 servings of fruit and vegetables everyday, avoid processed, packaged foods, rubbish foods, remain happy, with my superior genes I will survive, I will SURVIVE 

 

BTW, having green eyes is important 👀

[rumak]

19 hours ago, dinsdale said:

You never post anything other than tripe. No cited articles and no counterarguments of any substance, simply ad hominem, insults and puerile comments complete with the obligatory negative emojis. Quite frankly in all these years I can't remember an example where you've actually directly answered a poster's question. In actual fact you contribute nothing of any substantive nature to any discussion.

 

As i have recently pointed out .... and others before me... this member is the epitome of a TROLL.  Here is an applicable definition of our beloved master troll :  "A peer reviewed study claims that every internet troll has a different backstory and therefore different reasons for feeling the need to troll a community or an individual on the internet.  Often lonely  , sex deprived, and needing attention , the degree to which the troll suffers can often be measured by how many emojis they use to try to hide their inability to verbally communicate .  It is also the sign of a very very small pee pee."