Jump to content

Outcry in Seville: Botched Virgin Mary Restoration Sparks Tears and Fury


Recommended Posts

Posted
10 hours ago, Social Media said:

Local media captured the sentiment clearly. Diario de Sevilla noted that while the Virgin’s face appeared cleaner, “what most caught the attention, besides the clarity of her face, were her eyelashes, significantly more abundant and which, to a certain extent, changed the expression of her face, somewhat modifying the characteristic gaze of the Virgin Mary.”

If it had been a British restorer she might have had a trout pout?

  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Can we PLEASE have an explanation of which is which? The current display is most unhelpful. 

And can people please show a modicum of respect for the image in question. Please remember there are a lot of Catholics who may be offended by your silly comments. 

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Down 4
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Magictoad said:

Can we PLEASE have an explanation of which is which? The current display is most unhelpful. 

And can people please show a modicum of respect for the image in question. Please remember there are a lot of Catholics who may be offended by your silly comments. 

Maybe they should follow the Islams and not allow any photos or effigies of their 'leaders'. 

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

Who actually gives a fl**** f****?

 

Imaginary friend stuff, totally irrelevant to real life.

  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Magictoad said:

Can we PLEASE have an explanation of which is which? The current display is most unhelpful. 

And can people please show a modicum of respect for the image in question. Please remember there are a lot of Catholics who may be offended by your silly comments. 

What, sex pat Catholics in Thailand? Blessed are the cheese makers.

Posted
5 hours ago, Watawattana said:

If it had been a British restorer she might have had a trout pout?

And fake tits and tattoos.

 

And not a Virgin. 
Like Mary was not a virgin, she was a bare faced liar.

Posted
3 hours ago, Magictoad said:

Can we PLEASE have an explanation of which is which? The current display is most unhelpful. 

And can people please show a modicum of respect for the image in question. Please remember there are a lot of Catholics who may be offended by your silly comments. 

If Catholics are offended they should perhaps be reminded that worshipping an image is idolatry.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, soalbundy said:

Looks like the priest has been at her.........again, no wonder she's crying.

 nah...wrong gender and too old

Posted
6 hours ago, Purdey said:

Hey Macarena. (Ay!)

It's just an imaginary depiction. I am not sure anyone knows what she looked like.

Nobody knows what she looked like, every "image"/ depiction of Mary is just an artist's impression.

Posted
3 hours ago, Magictoad said:

Can we PLEASE have an explanation of which is which? The current display is most unhelpful. 

And can people please show a modicum of respect for the image in question. Please remember there are a lot of Catholics who may be offended by your silly comments. 

Respect for what.? A lump of concrete.?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member



×
×
  • Create New...