Jump to content

Early assessment suggests US strikes didn’t destroy Iran’s nuclear sites


Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Leaked preliminary report expressing low confidence. "It could be limited or it could be very severe". CNN only ran with the "limited damage" assessment line and also didn't mention the "low confidence" aspect. The OP and others on this thread believed CNN. Later assessments now including Israel and the CIA are saying very severe.

more CNN ...

 

Trump Angrily Calls for CNN to Fire Reporter Over Story on Iran Nuclear Strikes: She Should Be ‘Thrown Out Like a Dog'

 

 

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Bkk Brian said:

What's he lying about?

take time to hear her out or chose to ignore. You know where my money is in that lol

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
Just now, sharot724 said:

take time to jear her out or chose to ignor You know where my money is in that lol

This is a discussion forum not video blog, you said 

 

"We all knew Trump will be Trump."

 

So what is he allegedly lying about?

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I am not a big fan of Trump but I absolutely wish him success in his dealings with Iran.

 

Iranian mad mullahs have been a menace since 1979 and if they can be reined in I am in support of whoever can do it.

 

I can't understand anyone who doesn't support this.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, jerrymahoney said:

In the video, Sen. Duckworth says Trump is lying about the movement of uranium pre-strike.

She claims that "we now know that 880lbs of highly enriched Uranium was moved, you can tell that from the footage and pictures."

 

Interesting that she has confirmed this and nobody else has but she reckons Trump is the liar.

 

Its a possibility it was moved but its certainly not confirmed.

  • Agree 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Cheers. Sadly those with Trump living rent free in their heads 24/7 will believe anything and everything that is designed to make Trump look bad and start daily threads about it. How many times do we see CNN, MSNBC and other MSM (the "fake news") as sources for their threads.

The guy on here are as equally pathetic as the threads they start and the news they believe

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

You asked a question. I answered.

I asked a question to the member who posted the link, I added some further information in the video to you that she lied.

Posted
13 minutes ago, cdemundo said:

I am not a big fan of Trump but I absolutely wish him success in his dealings with Iran.

 

Iranian mad mullahs have been a menace since 1979 and if they can be reined in I am in support of whoever can do it.

 

I can't understand anyone who doesn't support this.

Iran and Iraq have nothing to do with my Khao Soi dish. 

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Jeff the Chef said:

Such bollo x these wiki pages, especially quoting the WoPo, a blatant anti Trump Democrat backing outlet.

If Trump says something but gets the date wrong by a day, or a figure wrong, the wopo fact check him and says he lied, i dont see any other politician held to the same scrutiny as Trump, Both Biden and Harris lied in the debates, but only Trump was being fact checked.

Imo, anyone that quotes wiki of fact checkers is a gullible mug, and thats putting it politely so as not to break forum rules. 

Posted

Desperate feckless haters doing what they do when Trump scores a WIN and there is/are plenty of WINNINGs going on in America and around the globe thanks to to Trump and MAGA much to the chagrin of all you deranged butt-hurt losers aspiring to your woke ideology and Trump hating psychosis. U all lead such a pathetic and useless existence. There's in excess of 1300 more days of Trump MAGA WINNING to be had. U may want to consult with suicide prevention hotline in your jurisdiction, local. LOL

word of advice: stop inhaling the brainwashing fumes from your beloved go-to regime media spin activists at CNN and MSNBC. 

 

ha ha ha

 

 

 

  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

I feel that when Hesketh invited the Ayatollah onto a group WhatsApp Iran strategy call it could have had an effect on where the centrifuges went to.

  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, illisdean said:

Desperate feckless haters doing what they do when Trump scores a WIN and there is/are plenty of WINNINGs going on in America and around the globe thanks to to Trump and MAGA much to the chagrin of all you deranged butt-hurt losers aspiring to your woke ideology and Trump hating psychosis. U all lead such a pathetic and useless existence. There's in excess of 1300 more days of Trump MAGA WINNING to be had. U may want to consult with suicide prevention hotline in your jurisdiction, local. LOL

word of advice: stop inhaling the brainwashing fumes from your beloved go-to regime media spin activists at CNN and MSNBC. 

 

ha ha ha

 

 

 

Another hate post calling others "haters"! :coffee1:

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
22 hours ago, Wingate said:

If the bunker buster bombs had actually penetrated the chamber, there would be a radiation signature. There is none.

 

This "bunker" wasn't for storage, it was for the enrichment centrifuge processes, so nascent radiation levels would be negligible anyway. Think 'clean room'.

 

22 hours ago, Wingate said:

The other possibility is that Iran suspected the strike would come and moved all their U-235 beforehand.

 

They already admitted as much before any talk of strikes when inspectors discovered, or were told, that it wasn't where they last inspected it. Satellite imagery already recorded 'stuff' being moved in trucks.

 

22 hours ago, Wingate said:

It certainly seems all the 60% enriched U-235 Iran had last week, they still have.

 

You can take that to the bank. But even if US intelligence knows where it was moved to, how do they "obliterate" it safely?

  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Bkk Brian said:

.
@SecDef SLAMS the Fake News: "The skill and the courage it took to go into enemy territory, flying 36 hours on behalf of the American people... to take out a nuclear program is beyond what anyone in this audience can fathom. And then the instinct — the instinct of CNN... The New York Times is to try to find a way to spin it for their own political reasons, to try to hurt 
@POTUS or our country."

 

 

Oh, cry me a river, Pete, you incompetent clown.

Why are there reporters present? These performance pieces are for an audience of exactly one anyway.

Posted
4 hours ago, cdemundo said:

I am not a big fan of Trump but I absolutely wish him success in his dealings with Iran.

 

Iranian mad mullahs have been a menace since 1979 and if they can be reined in I am in support of whoever can do it.

 

I can't understand anyone who doesn't support this.

Don't confuse paying attention to facts with supporting Iran.

 

Actually, overstating the damage is in the interest of Iran, as it means downplaying the remaining risk.

 

Iran's communication is now that sites have been "badly damaged".

https://www.timesofisrael.com/iran-says-nuclear-sites-badly-damaged-amid-conflicting-reports-on-strikes-success/

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member




×
×
  • Create New...