Jump to content

Early assessment suggests US strikes didn’t destroy Iran’s nuclear sites


Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

No, you posted a very specific claim, why try to deny it?

 

 

Yes, my claim was that this didn't come from some "utter demented clowns on the Internet".

Correct.

Posted

Half of $1 billion to make a couple of big holes. A bargain really, when you considered it cost $1 trillion to catch Saddam.
 

”Mission Accomplished”?

 

Again?

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Yes, my claim was that this didn't come from some "utter demented clowns on the Internet".

Correct.

Your claim was false and your further denial is even more dishonest and shows that you cannot actually debate at all. This is not what really happened.

 

image.png.5de5f5b69442391339ad82ebbc9784d6.png

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

CNN, only the truly afflicted get their daily fill of fake news slop from these fake news activists haters. Think about it haters & losers before you get your balloon knot in tatters again.

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
5 hours ago, theblether said:

Two weeks ago - "Iran doesn't have a nuclear weapons program, Donald is delusional."

 

This week - "The attacks have only set back Iran's nuclear weapons program a few months, Donald is a failure." 

 

Or:

 

"Na, na, na, na, na - Iran moved their nuke capability before Donald's bombs hit." 

 

Source - utter demented clowns on the Internet. 

 

 

 

5 hours ago, candide said:

Proof? :biggrin:

 

It seems you are making stuff up again!

Crickets...... :biggrin:

Posted
4 hours ago, darbie-foos said:

fake news and the haters here hate, despise, loath Trump success. You all been had by CNN and the other fake news hoax pushing networks and because of your derangment Trump waltzed back into WH and is making stellar accomplishments nonstop. prove me wrong and be sure to contrast with the brain rotted Biden and his epic dumpster fire failures the past 4 years.

 

 

It's not fake news  it's a leaked preliminary assessment. :biggrin:

Posted
22 hours ago, cdemundo said:

I am not a big fan of Trump but I absolutely wish him success in his dealings with Iran.

 

Iranian mad mullahs have been a menace since 1979 and if they can be reined in I am in support of whoever can do it.

 

I can't understand anyone who doesn't support this.

 

The left wingers in America hate Trump so much they hope for failure of everything to justify their hatred.  They would applaud a collapse of our economy (remember they shouted joy about the short term drop in the stock markets) and here they hope against hope a military strike ordered against a clearly mad regime's nuclear ambitions failed.  In short - they are bat<deleted> crazy hating on Trump and will believe ANYTHING printed that disparages he or anything he was behind.

 

This isn't just disagreement of policy which is a laudable position.  This is crazed hatred.

 

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Down 4
  • Thanks 2
Posted

NY Times headline this AM:

 

Fate of Iran’s Enriched Uranium Is a Mystery
U.S. intelligence agencies had long assessed that, faced with the possibility of an attack on its nuclear facilities, Iran would try to move its stockpile.

Posted
24 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

NY Times headline this AM:

 

Fate of Iran’s Enriched Uranium Is a Mystery
U.S. intelligence agencies had long assessed that, faced with the possibility of an attack on its nuclear facilities, Iran would try to move its stockpile.

 

  Yes but that's 'fake news', don'tcha know?

 

  The Make Americans Goobers Again crowd thinks that only Trump's daily plethora of lies are what one should believe.  

 

  

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
1 hour ago, jimmybcool said:

 

The left wingers in America hate Trump so much they hope for failure of everything to justify their hatred.  They would applaud a collapse of our economy (remember they shouted joy about the short term drop in the stock markets) and here they hope against hope a military strike ordered against a clearly mad regime's nuclear ambitions failed.  In short - they are bat<deleted> crazy hating on Trump and will believe ANYTHING printed that disparages he or anything he was behind.

 

This isn't just disagreement of policy which is a laudable position.  This is crazed hatred.

 

From start to finish total nonsense.

Posted

An update on what this thread is based on (a preliminary report with low confidence leaked only days after the strikes) and a more updated assessment NOT from CNN.

 

  • Haha 2
Posted

From the above:

 

Q:   Sir, you cited a body of credible intelligence to suggest the damage at Fordo and other places. What is that referring to, and when can we see it?

 

SECRETARY OF DEFENSE PETE HEGSETH:  I was reading from the CIA director's statement, which came out last night. CIA — again, they do the BDA. They do the assessment. CIA can confirm that a body of credible intelligence indicates — it also goes on to say new intelligence from historically reliable and accurate sources and methods.

Posted
2 hours ago, dinsdale said:

An update on what this thread is based on (a preliminary report with low confidence leaked only days after the strikes) and a more updated assessment NOT from CNN.

 

 

It takes a "true believer" to accept the word of the local town drunk over the reporting of CNN....because alcoholics never lie.  But you do you.

 

"While drunk in his military uniform – a violation of military laws – Mr. Hegseth was so inebriated that his brother had to carry him out of a Minneapolis strip club. This occurred during a drill weekend with the Minnesota National Guard."


"Mr. Hegseth regularly became so drunk that he passed out, threw up, and had to be carried out of family events and public settings, sometimes shouting sexually and racially offensive statements."

 

https://www.reed.senate.gov/news/releases/reed-statement-on-abuse-allegations-against-pete-hegseth

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

My new hero is Gen Dan Caine (Chariman of the JCS). He said many of the B-2 Crew were graduates fo the USAF Figher Weapons School "where they do not play beach football or vollyeball".  Of course this is a dig at the Navy and the Top Gun movies.  I was very impressed with how he explained the mission unlike Sec Def who sounded like he was going after "the lying media"  with much of his time.  The contrast between Sec Def and Gen Caine was dramatic.  One is a dedicated professional who has served his country and the USAF for over 30 years and the other is just embarrassing. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, TheAppletons said:

 

It takes a "true believer" to accept the word of the local town drunk over the reporting of CNN....because alcoholics never lie.  But you do you.

 

"While drunk in his military uniform – a violation of military laws – Mr. Hegseth was so inebriated that his brother had to carry him out of a Minneapolis strip club. This occurred during a drill weekend with the Minnesota National Guard."


"Mr. Hegseth regularly became so drunk that he passed out, threw up, and had to be carried out of family events and public settings, sometimes shouting sexually and racially offensive statements."

 

https://www.reed.senate.gov/news/releases/reed-statement-on-abuse-allegations-against-pete-hegseth

 

 

Pitiful. What about the general? What about CNN using an early assessment with low confidence. What about later intellence. Your answer is simply attack the man and not the ball. Pitiful.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...