3 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

That is a weak argument.....and you must know it.

 

I am generally averse to having bits chopped off.....especially without my permission......but if I had appendicitis ....well that is a whole other story.

 

Appendicitis can frequently kill, foreskins, tended to properly, do not kill.

I can't miss what I only had for one or two weeks as a baby.

 

I have already posted the problems uncircumcised males may have.

 

There are rational reasons for being circumcised. I have yet to see a single rational argument for keeping a foreskin.

 

Run that bit about weak arguments past me again.

4 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

I don't subscribe to the 'infectious disease' theory. In my book, there are not any. But her book, illustrates very simply, that; #1 they arrived on the scene long after the problem had gone. #2 There was a spike in the problem after the specific jabs were rolled out.

 

As for infection. I've not seen evidence that shows a sick person can make a well person sick.

 

And as Dr Roytas says in his book; '''Show me the evidence?'''

 

When exactly were these halcyon days of disease free humankind?

 

Why was there disease before it?

 

Where did those diseases come from?

 

What happened to make them go way?

 

Why did these diseases return?

Wikipedia

 

Pierre Kory is an American critical care physician who gained attention during the COVID-19 pandemic for advocating widespread off-label use of ineffective drug treatments for COVID-19, as president and co-founder of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC).[1][2] Kory testified twice to the U.S. Senate regarding COVID-19. During his testimony in December 2020, Kory erroneously claimed that the antiparasitic medication ivermectin was a "wonder drug" with "miraculous effectiveness" against COVID-19.[3][4]

 

I think no further comments necessary 😱

3 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

What's Poppy Cock?  The owners of Big Pharma are the money earners.

White-coats got plenty of bonuses for getting the gullible to roll up their sleeves.

2 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

I can't miss what I only had for one or two weeks as a baby.

 

I have already posted the problems uncircumcised males may have.

 

There are rational reasons for being circumcised. I have yet to see a single rational argument for keeping a foreskin.

 

Run that bit about weak arguments past me again.

 

Appendicitis....potential killer, absolutely requiring medical intervention

 

Chopping a bit off you willy because your parents wanted to......

 

Not really comparable.

3 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Then it might be better to give  more polite answer than,"But the mRNA jabs DO affect you cognitive ability, hence the many moronic responses in the threads I post",   as many are just believers in vaccines because they think they work, and have a high likelihood of possibly saving their lives, and have saved millions over the years, so many believe in them.

My statement that 'the mRNA jabs DO affect you cognitive ability' was not meant as an insult, but several independent studies (which I posted in previous threads) provide evidence of that fact.  

And yes you are correct that 'many are just believers in vaccines because they think they work', which is what Big Pharma and all their cronies in the medical establishment, Public Health and the compromised mainstream media want them to believe. 

When the REALITY around you does not align with the '100% safe and effective' vaccines, you can either double-down in your belief or start questioning the narrative.  My threads are meant to provide information to those that are opting for the 'path less traveled'...

 

1 minute ago, Stiddle Mump said:

White-coats got plenty of bonuses for getting the gullible to roll up their sleeves.

And are also there to help people with their research, which makes one happy their research saved lives. In the beginning, money wasn't as much a factor as now. The greedy got greedier over time. It's not gullible when you want to live longer and not succumb to  diseases that have killed millions over the years.

Just now, Will B Good said:

 

Appendicitis....potential killer, absolutely requiring medical intervention

 

Chopping a bit off you willy because your parents wanted to......

 

Not really comparable.

Did your parents do everything you wanted?

 

You are emotionally invested. I'm not.

 

4 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

My statement that 'the mRNA jabs DO affect you cognitive ability' was not meant as an insult, but several independent studies (which I posted in previous threads) provide evidence of that fact.  

And yes you are correct that 'many are just believers in vaccines because they think they work', which is what Big Pharma and all their cronies in the medical establishment, Public Health and the compromised mainstream media want them to believe. 

When the REALITY around you does not align with the '100% safe and effective' vaccines, you can either double-down in your belief or start questioning the narrative.  My threads are meant to provide information to those that are opting for the 'path less traveled'...

 

If you'd read that link, you'll see it was those who were already lower in cognitive ability that were hesitant. The smarter you are, the more you understand sciences and listen less to opinions, which are likely biased or there for profit gaining for themselves or others. Facts are facts, vaccines have saved millions, and the Covid ones could have also. 

Just now, Lacessit said:

Did your parents do everything you wanted?

 

You are emotionally invested. I'm not.

 

 

Did my parents do everything I wanted them to do?

 

Really don't know how to respond.

Just now, Red Phoenix said:

never address the facts/evidence in the threads I post,

 

 

Best laugh of the day...hat off.

2 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

Did my parents do everything I wanted them to do?

 

Really don't know how to respond.

Give me one rational argument for keeping your foreskin.

 

Not now, of course. That would be quite painful and traumatic.

 

Do you think you would suffer PTSD from being cut one week after birth?

18 minutes ago, transam said:

...I don't think willy skin is any protection regarding running around in a birthday suit, we humans developed having willy skin, the same as 99% of land animals, and is still the same today, it is meant to be there.

Wouldn't you agree.......?  😉

 

For once I agree with you. 

Humans existed for thousands of years before that surgical religion-based mutilation was introduced.

 

Just like they have lived for thousands of years without the need for vaccines, masks and 'a pill for every ill'.  

27 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

The threads on the MRNA gen-therapies (it are not 'vaccines') that I start in this sub-forum, are NOT meant for the closed-mind sciency-following vax-propaganda believers.  The reactions from that group as good as never address the facts/evidence in the threads I post, but are mostly ad-hominem attacks, insults or non-sequitur responses. 

The threads I start are primarily meant for those AN members that only have access to the compromised mainstream media and Public Health authoritiy channels.  But when having some rational thinking left and seeing the devastation these jabs are doing their own or their loved ones health, are now somewhat doubting whether the vax-pushing actors 'have their best interest at heart'.   

I am not closed-minded in any kind of way. Neither am I obsessed with creating 100 threads about the same thing.

8 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

If you'd read that link, you'll see it was those who were already lower in cognitive ability that were hesitant. The smarter you are, the more you understand sciences and listen less to opinions, which are likely biased or there for profit gaining for themselves or others. Facts are facts, vaccines have saved millions, and the Covid ones could have also. 

Do some research and you will find that vaccine-hesitancy is HIGHEST in those with a University-degree or a PhD.  

2 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Give me one rational argument for keeping your foreskin.

 

It's mine.

 

There are always risks (quite serious ones) with any form of medical intervention, particularly when an incision is made.

 

It is for me to decide, in the absence of any immediate medical necessity, to have it removed.

 

The benefits of removing it are zero, if you are mentally capable of carrying out appropriate actions re: person hygiene

 

 

4 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

Do some research and you will find that vaccine-hesitancy is HIGHEST in those with a University-degree or a PhD.  

Which means the higher intelligence has some thinking more before they act. The smarter a person is the more they worry, thinking of all the possible outcomes, some being negative. Knew this years ago in most everything that requires thinking more.

1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

 

It's mine.

 

There are always risks (quite serious ones) with any form of medical intervention, particularly when an incision is made.

 

It is for me to decide, in the absence of any immediate medical necessity, to have it removed.

 

The benefits of removing it are zero, if you are mentally capable of carrying out appropriate actions re: person hygiene

 

 

So there is that one benefit, easier maintenance.

4 minutes ago, Gottfrid said:

I am not closed-minded in any kind of way. Neither am I obsessed with creating 100 threads about the same thing.

I do realize that my posts are a 'drop in the ocean' compared with the 24/7 vax-propaganda.  

But as StiddleMump wrote, I want to keep the kettle boiling as one thread will not be sufficient to make the brain-washed start considering that there might be some truth in those annoying fact-based articles that ring a different bell than the mainstream media.  

Just now, Red Phoenix said:

I do realize that my posts are a 'drop in the ocean' compared with the 24/7 vax-propaganda.  

But as StiddleMump wrote, I want to keep the kettle boiling as one thread will not be sufficient to make the brain-washed start considering that there might be some truth in those annoying fact-based articles that ring a different bell than the mainstream media.  

But many people that take vaccines aren't brainwashed but thinking of the possible negative outcomes of not taking a vaccination for a deadly disease. The lesser of two evils? Side effects come from all medicines, but without them the other side is possibly not being here any longer.

13 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Give me one rational argument for keeping your foreskin.

 

Not now, of course. That would be quite painful and traumatic.

 

Do you think you would suffer PTSD from being cut one week after birth?

 

Even if you do not experience any long-lasting effects from the trauma that you definitely will have when being mutilated, there is no - non-religious - reason to apply it as standard practice on new-born males.  

Same as with the mRNA vaccine, even if you do not experience any harm yet that you definitely will get when being innoculated, the practice is neither safe nor effective, and more importantly: totally unnecessary. 

Just now, Red Phoenix said:

Give me one rational argument for keeping your foreskin.

I was born with it.

Seriously I had a friend who had the operation to remove it when he was 25 - he was in extreme pain for weeks.

 

26 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

I do realize that my posts are a 'drop in the ocean' compared with the 24/7 vax-propaganda.  

But as Stiddle Mump wrote, I want to keep the kettle boiling as one thread will not be sufficient to make the brain-washed start considering that there might be some truth in those annoying fact-based articles that ring a different bell than the mainstream media.  

We, who feel passionately about the welfare of humans, owe it, not just to ourselves, but to everyone, to try our best to inform. If we can get just a few to stop. and think, it is well worth it. 

 

Red, and others, encourage members, and guests, to do their own research.

 

The members who constantly post horrid personal attacks, and silly-billy remarks, usually, have no interest in researching anything. But even these sheep, would now question the need for a jab, for them and their loved ones, should another pandemic arrive.

 

Nature has all the answers.

24 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

I want to keep the kettle boiling as one thread will not be sufficient to make the brain-washed start considering that there might be some truth in those annoying fact-based articles that ring a different bell than the mainstream media. 

So, why do you call people that don´t agree with your view brain-washed? You are running propaganda for telling everyone that vaccines kill, while the fact is that they save more lives than they kill.

44 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

I can't miss what I only had for one or two weeks as a baby.

 

I have already posted the problems uncircumcised males may have.

There are rational reasons for being circumcised. I have yet to see a single rational argument for keeping a foreskin.

Run that bit about weak arguments past me again.

 

Wow, that's a real cracker > You can't miss what you only had for one or two weeks as a baby?  

Just ponder the enormity of that statement...

 

Why then not also remove the appendix immediately at birth, as that will ensure you won't get appendicitis. 

7 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

We, who feel passionately about the welfare of humans, owe it, not just to ourselves, but to everyone, to try our best to inform. If we can get just a few to stop. and think, it is well worth it. 

 

Red, and others, encourage members, and guests, to do their own research.

 

The members who constantly post horrid personal attacks, and silly-billy remarks, usually, have no interest in researching anything. But even these sheep, would now question the need for a jab, for them and their loved ones, should another pandemic arrive.

 

Nature has all the answers.

 

But even these sheep.......

 

Oh the irony

Sudden infant death syndrome not caused by vaccines. The cause of sudden death syndrome is unknown but babies not having their vaccine is a definite cause of death to which you are contributing.

All your conspiracy theories about vaccinations actually harm not just the stupid individuals who believe them but they damage the community and society at large.  Because herd immunity is required.  Now that parents are not giving their kids measles shots we are seeing death by measles for the first time in decades. 

It's a horrible way to go and completely unnecessary given that we have and excellent vaccine to protect against measles. 

Please stop using this platform for your unsubstantiated, crazy ideas. Why don't you take them to a medical forum instead?

POLIO VACCINE has saved so many people from so much pain, misery and death it makes your ramblings look pathetic. 

1 minute ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

Wow, that's a real cracker > You can't miss what you only had for one or two weeks as a baby?  

Just ponder the enormity of that statement...

 

Why then not also remove the appendix immediately at birth, as that will ensure you won't get appendicitis. 

Or a bit of lobotomy if it is thought the babe was a 'wrong un'.

 

These beautiful babies don't need anything, but mother's milk, love and a comfortable environment. 

 

Keep the filthy jabs away from kids i say.

35 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

It's mine.

 

There are always risks (quite serious ones) with any form of medical intervention, particularly when an incision is made.

 

It is for me to decide, in the absence of any immediate medical necessity, to have it removed.

 

The benefits of removing it are zero, if you are mentally capable of carrying out appropriate actions re: person hygiene

 

 

I said rational reasons.

 

Anyone would think you are talking about major heart surgery. It's not.

 

Back to the same argument as the anti-vaxxers, I see.

3 minutes ago, Gottfrid said:

So, why do you call people that don´t agree with your view brain-washed? You are running propaganda for telling everyone that vaccines kill, while the fact is that they save more lives than they kill.

Nope, do some independent research instead of simply swallowing what the vax-pushers want you to believe. 

mRNA shots have killed and are still killing and harming many more lives that they 'saved'.  

The truth is slowly but inevitably emerging, despite the billions of US $ of propaganda trying to convince you that they were the best thing since sliced bread.  And the relentless efforts to push ever more new mRNA shots and boosters, are falling flat (except for the cultish believers, that refuse to open their eyes to the reality all around them).