27 minutes ago, riclag said:

Declassification of Docs don't lie! 6 ways to Sunday cabal was covering up & manufacturing

a scheme to take down TRUMP.

 

 

Thanks Chuck . Heres the release of the Durham Annex.

"The intelligence the FBI received also included information and analysis from purported Leonard Benardo emails that stated, in part":The Durham annex states, “Analysts and officers whom [Durham’s team] interviewed, and who were well-versed in the Sensitive Intelligence collection, stated that their best assessment was that the Bernardo emails were likely authentic".

 

https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/newly-declassified-appendix-to-durham-report-sheds-additional-light-on-clinton-campaign-plan-to-falsely-tie-trump-to-russia-and-fbis-failure-to-investigate

Bombshell  evidence,declassified docs in the link.

 

Soros' alleged ties to Russiagate exposed in declassified annex of Durham report

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/soros-alleged-ties-russiagate-exposed-declassified-annex-durham-report

Democrats are history!

 

 

7 minutes ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

Democrats are history!

 

 

Receipts don't lie! Many of the lies were all ready known,except for the Soro's connection.

Obamagate nearly started a civil war and probably led to the loons getting so worked up,

that they tried to assassinate Trump ,SCOTUS .Need accountability 

Heres how Politico is covering the scandal!

Silence !

https://www.politico.com/

 

Obama wikipedia - no update still

 

google "grassley release durham annex" 

no msm hits

Breaking!

 

With Soros, follow the money!

 

1 hour ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

Breaking!

 

With Soros, follow the money!

 

I don't think Bondi's Strike force is big enough, if /when they investigate ,Open Society's involvement . The bad Apple's basket is enormous  .

2 hours ago, riclag said:

Heres how Politico is covering the scandal!

Silence !

https://www.politico.com/

 

Obama wikipedia - no update still

 

google "grassley release durham annex" 

no msm hits

The purposeful silence of Legacy media reminds me of when the 

2 IRS Agents turn Whistleblowers , Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler

exposed the Hunter Biden/DOJ Tax cover up.

Silence for many weeks.

Some troll posts trolling about other members and the replies have been removed.

 

A post in which the quoted content had been altered and the replies were removed.

3 hours ago, riclag said:

The purposeful silence of Legacy media reminds me of when the 

2 IRS Agents turn Whistleblowers , Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler

exposed the Hunter Biden/DOJ Tax cover up.

Silence for many weeks.

Most of what the so-called whistleblowers claimed happened under Trump! 🤣

So it was a cover up by the Trump administration! 😆

More to come! Keep it comin! The more the better.Raw Intel,

FBI helping HC.

Remember Stroz & Lisa Page.

Remember Hillary sitting with her lawyers at the FBI interview.

Remember Lisa Monaco.

 

So did your leader, & current POTUS. Trump makes it his business to know his enemies and their every move. It's a recipe for success and the route ascension to the 47th POTUS. Trump deals in 3D chess, while the Muppet left plays tiddly winks between watching re-runs of Hee Haw. Liberals are feckless, insanely reactive and just plain stupid and Trump has crushed the fu*k out of them without breaking a sweat but only getting shot in the ear. 

 

 

On 8/1/2025 at 1:30 AM, riclag said:

Bombshell  evidence,declassified docs in the link.

 

Soros' alleged ties to Russiagate exposed in declassified annex of Durham report

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/soros-alleged-ties-russiagate-exposed-declassified-annex-durham-report

Because of the recent Obamagate/Russiagate Raw intel released involving  the SORO'S 

families involvement in the biggest political &  criminal scandal of Obama & others  attempts in Manufacturing a Treasonous Conspiracy. Congressmen Burchett is calling for Oversight to Subpoena George Soros and his attorney, Leonard Benardo. 

 

 

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/31/us/politics/trump-clinton-emails-russia-investigation.html?unlocked_article_code=1.a08.WmHr.TWoZEuTvFEKm&smid=url-share

 

Quote

The Trump-era special counsel who scoured the Russia investigation for wrongdoing gathered evidence that undermines a theory pushed by some Republicans that Hillary Clinton’s campaign conspired to frame Donald J. Trump for colluding with Moscow in the 2016 election, information declassified on Thursday shows.

 

Quote

 

Even as the releases shed more light on a seismic political period nearly a decade ago, Mr. Trump and his allies have wildly overstated what the documents show, accusing former President Barack Obama of “treason.”

The release of the annex was no exception. John Ratcliffe, the C.I.A. director, said in a statement that the materials proved that suspicions of Russian collusion stemmed from “a coordinated plan to prevent and destroy Donald Trump’s presidency.”

And Kash Patel, the F.B.I. director, who has a long history of pushing false claims about the Russia investigation, declared on social media that the annex revealed “evidence that the Clinton campaign plotted to frame President Trump and fabricate the Russia collusion hoax.”

 

In reality, the annex shows the opposite, indicating that a key piece of supposed evidence for the claim that Mrs. Clinton approved a plan to tie Mr. Trump to Russia is not credible: Mr. Durham concluded that the email from July 27, 2016, and a related one dated two days earlier were probably manufactured.

 

In his report, Mr. Durham used the U.S. government’s knowledge of the supposed plan, via the Russian memos, to criticize F.B.I. officials involved in the Russia investigation for not being more skeptical when they later received a copy of the Steele dossier and used it to obtain a wiretap order. The dossier, a compendium of Trump-Russia claims compiled by a former British spy, stemmed from a Democratic opposition research effort and was later discredited.

 

“Whether or not the Clinton Plan intelligence was based on reliable or unreliable information, or was ultimately true or false,” Mr. Durham wrote, agents should have been more cautious when approaching material that appeared to have partisan origins.

 

Mr. Durham’s report also mentioned that Mrs. Clinton and others in the campaign dismissed the allegation as ridiculous, positing that it was Russian disinformation. But Mr. Durham banished to the annex concrete details he had found that bolstered her campaign’s rebuttal, burying until now the conclusion that the email he called the “Clinton Plan intelligence” was almost certainly a product of Russian disinformation.

The annex also cited a purported email from July 25, 2016, also attributed to Mr. Benardo. Referring to President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, the message claimed that a Clinton adviser was proposing a plan “to demonize Putin and Trump,” adding, “Later the F.B.I. will put more oil into the fire.”

That message identified the adviser as “Julie,” while the July 27 one said “Julia.” An accompanying Russian intelligence memo identified the aide as Julianne Smith, a foreign policy adviser for the Clinton campaign who worked at the Center for a New American Security.

But the trove of Russian files contained two different versions of the July 25 message — one that somehow had an additional sentence. And Mr. Benardo denied sending it, telling Mr. Durham’s team that he did not know who “Julie” was and would not use a phrase like “put more oil into the fire.”

Ms. Smith informed Mr. Durham in 2021 that she had no memory of proposing anything to campaign leadership about attacking Mr. Trump over Russia, although she “recalled conversations with others in the campaign expressing their genuine concerns that the D.N.C. hack was a threat to the electoral system, and that Trump and his advisers appeared to have troubling ties to Russia.”

The annex also shows that Mr. Durham obtained emails from several liberal-leaning think tanks mentioned in the Russian memos and did not find copies of the messages supposedly written by Mr. Benardo. The think tanks included the Open Society Foundations, the Atlantic Council, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the Center for a New American Security.

But Mr. Durham found other “emails, attachments and documents that contain language and references with the exact same or similar verbiage” to those messages. Those included a July 25 email by a Carnegie Endowment cyberexpert that contained an extensive passage about Russian hacking that was echoed, verbatim, in the purported July 25 message attributed to Mr. Benardo.

Mr. Durham also obtained text messages from Ms. Smith on July 25 showing that she had unsuccessfully tried to determine whether the F.B.I. had opened an investigation into the Democratic National Committee breach, although they did not mention Mr. Trump. And he obtained a July 27 email from Ms. Smith asking her colleagues at the think tank to sign a bipartisan statement criticizing Mr. Trump’s denunciations of the NATO alliance as reckless and too friendly to Russia.

Mr. Durham wrote that it would have been logical for someone to conclude that she played a role in efforts by the Clinton campaign to tie Mr. Trump to Russia. Her July 25 texts and July 27 email could be seen as support for the idea that such a plan existed, he added.

But ultimately, in weighing all the evidence, Mr. Durham concluded that the Russians had probably faked the key emails, the annex shows.

 

“The office’s best assessment is that the July 25 and July 27 emails that purport to be from Benardo were ultimately a composite of several emails that were obtained through Russian intelligence hacking of the U.S.-based think tanks, including the Open Society Foundations, the Carnegie Endowment and others,” it says.

 

The Russian intelligence memos first came to public attention in 2017 after The New York Times and The Washington Post explored a decision by James B. Comey Jr., the former F.B.I. director, to violate Justice Department procedure. In publicly addressing the investigation into Mrs. Clinton, he sharply criticized her use of a private email server but said no charges could be brought over it.

 

Mr. Comey later told Congress and an inspector general that he decided to be the face of the decision, rather than allowing Justice Department officials to do so, as is typical, in part because of something in the Russian memos. A Dutch spy agency had hacked the memos from a Russian spy agency’s server in 2016 and gave copies to the U.S. government.

 

Two of the memos described purported communications in January 2016 and March 2016 involving a top Democratic Party leader, Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, one with Mr. Benardo and the other with a different official at the Open Society Foundations. The memos indicated that the attorney general at the time, Loretta E. Lynch, was pressuring the F.B.I. about the email inquiry and sharing confidential information about it with the Clinton campaign.

 

But Mr. Comey and other officials also said they believed that the memos described fake emails, in part because the January one also said that Mr. Comey himself was trying to help Republicans win the election. In 2017, Mr. Benardo and Ms. Wasserman Schultz said that they had never even met, let alone communicated about Mrs. Clinton’s emails.

 

The Trump administration has also declassified and released a report by Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee that summarized unflattering claims about Mrs. Clinton from the Russian memos without flagging suspicions that the trove contained misinformation.

After the special counsel investigating the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia, Robert S. Mueller III, issued his final report, the attorney general at the time, William P. Barr, assigned Mr. Durham to hunt for evidence proving Mr. Trump’s conspiracy theory that the investigation had stemmed from a deep-state plot against him.

 

In 2020, as The New York Times has reported, after Mr. Durham failed to find evidence of intelligence abuses, he shifted to instead trying to find a basis to blame the Clinton campaign for the fact that Mr. Trump’s campaign had come under suspicion of colluding with Russia.

Mr. Durham was never able to prove any Clinton campaign conspiracy to frame Mr. Trump by spreading information that it knew to be false about his ties to Russia, but he nevertheless used court filings and his final report to insinuate such suspicions. He brought charges of false statements against two people involved in outside efforts to scrutinize possible ties between Mr. Trump and Russia, both of which ended in quick acquittals

 

 

https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/6d15e0e33b27f7e3/c842303b-full.pdf

 

 

More to Come 

 

No matter how the left spins it, the evidence is irrefutable.

The 6 ways to Sunday cabal had it in for Trump.

Oh and  those Insurance Plans of Stroz/Lisa Page, completely devoid of the conversation below.

The Russians didn't make that up.

 

 

7 hours ago, MicroB said:

But ultimately, in weighing all the evidence, Mr. Durham concluded that the Russians had probably faked the key emails, the annex shows.

 

“The office’s best assessment is that the July 25 and July 27 emails that purport to be from Benardo were ultimately a composite of several emails that were obtained through Russian intelligence hacking of the U.S.-based think tanks, including the Open Society Foundations, the Carnegie Endowment and others,” it says.

Funny that MAGAs are trying to use the annex in order to claim there was no Russian interference! 🤣

3 hours ago, riclag said:

More to Come 

 

 

 

Kash patel...

 

 

Odd? The anchor baby never uses his proper name......Kashyap Pramod Patel......I wonder if Trump knows it?.....he certainly knew Obama's full name.

 

 

8 hours ago, riclag said:

Because of the recent Obamagate/Russiagate Raw intel released involving  the SORO'S 

families involvement in the biggest political &  criminal scandal of Obama & others  attempts in Manufacturing a Treasonous Conspiracy. Congressmen Burchett is calling for Oversight to Subpoena George Soros and his attorney, Leonard Benardo. 

 

 

 

I was wondering why they did not already include Soros in their fake conspiracy theory! 🤣

On 8/1/2025 at 9:48 AM, riclag said:

The purposeful silence of Legacy media reminds me of when the 

2 IRS Agents turn Whistleblowers , Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler

exposed the Hunter Biden/DOJ Tax cover up.

Silence for many weeks.

The Great Reveal ! News media  would be confessing their own role if they cover the Obamagate Manufactured  lies.

 

More facts debunking the lefts spin!

 

33 minutes ago, riclag said:

More facts debunking the lefts spin!

 

More debunking NYT.

 

 

38 minutes ago, riclag said:

More facts debunking the lefts spin!

 

And, of course, Kash Patel is not known for being a liar! 🤣🤣🤣

They/them want everybody to look over there again!Good job Dan, Make the media who have been coordinating with the conspirators work so strenuously to spin the accused that they too will be held accountable.

 

Good ole Catherine Herridge, x Fox & CBS reporter still got the receipts

for Case Building. (Sent to the Deputy FBI Director).

 

Credit where credit is do! Catherine  should receive a Pulitzer !

 

For the MAGA lies propagandists..... 🤣

 

"The newly unclassified 29-page document from Durham, made public this week, contains a deflating conclusion for Gabbard. It confirms that Russian spies were behind the emails that were originally released as the result of a Russian cyber-hack of internal Democratic information channels and which Trump supporters believed showed the campaign of Hillary Clinton, his 2016 opponent, conspiring to accuse him of colluding with Moscow.

“The office’s best assessment is that the July 25 and July 27 emails that purport to be from Benardo were ultimately a composite of several emails that were obtained through Russian intelligence hacking of the US-based thinktanks,” Durham writes."

 

Durham disclosures further undermine Gabbard’s claims of plot against Trump

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/02/tulsi-gabbard-trump-john-durham-report

 

 

 

 

Mike it seems we've seen this before! , Fool me once ,shame on you ,it ain't working the second time. 

 

1 hour ago, riclag said:

Mike it seems we've seen this before! , Fool me once ,shame on you ,it ain't working the second time. 

 

Pathetic! It comes directly from your idol (Durham). 

 

The office’s best assessment is that the July 25 and July 27 emails that purport to be from Benardo were ultimately a composite of several emails that were obtained through Russian intelligence hacking of the US-based thinktanks,” Durham writes."

 

Durham disclosures further undermine Gabbard’s claims of plot against Trump

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/02/tulsi-gabbard-trump-john-durham-report

2 hours ago, riclag said:

Credit where credit is do! Catherine  should receive a Pulitzer !

 

 

 

....and they are still calling you a liar......where are the Epstein files you were so desperate to see released?......oh, before Trump told you to S T F U......spineless, anchor baby.