1 minute ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

 
Of course you’re not.  Not even a USC 

 

Leftists you are.  Same the world over.

 

You make a prediction like one.  Watch another one.

 

 

 

Maybe I was not clear, as opposed to reading difficulty on your end.

I think there is a decent chance that Trump is setting up the Dems on the Epstein files.  May be totally wrong but I would not rule it out. 

"Do anything you want with me – roas' me, hang me, skin me, drown me – but please, Br'er Fox, don't fling me in dat brier-patch"

 

And for sure they want to run against Gavin Gruesome in 2028.

Always entertaining to see our resident clowns respond to these threads. I dug out those posts in five minutes. 

 

Our low IQ brigade have sailed past both Morning Joe Scarborough and Nina Turner attacking Newsom for his rank stupidity. 

 

If I could be bothered I could list many more high profile Democrats who are on the attack against Newsom for his utter dumbness. 

 

He's creating a civil war within the Democratic Party - shall I explain why? 

 

I promise if I do I'll use small words so the hard of thinking can understand. 

5 minutes ago, Miloki said:

 

Maybe I was not clear, as opposed to reading difficulty on your end.

I think there is a decent chance that Trump is setting up the Dems on the Epstein files.  May be totally wrong but I would not rule it out. 

"Do anything you want with me – roas' me, hang me, skin me, drown me – but please, Br'er Fox, don't fling me in dat brier-patch"

 

And for sure they want to run against Gavin Gruesome in 2028.

I can read fine.

 

The problem is you can’t write without writing in code or some other subliminal language.

 

Write clear, concise and to the point.

Just now, ThreeCardMonte said:

I can read fine.

 

The problem is you can’t write without writing in code or some other subliminal language.

 

Write clear, concise and to the point.

Yawn.

 

How's that?

4 minutes ago, theblether said:

Always entertaining to see our resident clowns respond to these threads. I dug out those posts in five minutes. 

 

Our low IQ brigade have sailed past both Morning Joe Scarborough and Nina Turner attacking Newsom for his rank stupidity. 

 

If I could be bothered I could list many more high profile Democrats who are on the attack against Newsom for his utter dumbness. 

 

He's creating a civil war within the Democratic Party - shall I explain why? 

 

I promise if I do I'll use small words so the hard of thinking can understand. 

You can do anything you want.  You’re a big boy now.

 

Just clear everything with your handler first.

Just now, Miloki said:

Yawn.

 

How's that?

Read your past posts.

2 minutes ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

Read your past posts.

 

Sorry you were not exposed to Uncle Remus as a child.  Tragic.

2 minutes ago, Miloki said:

 

Sorry you were not exposed to Uncle Remus as a child.  Tragic.

I survived.  
 

You’re still under the influence.

1 minute ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

I survived.  
 

You’re still under the influence.

 

Seems like an apt analogy for my original point, so I guess so.

 

I'm sure the Tar Baby isn't over everyone's head but you do you.

10 hours ago, JAG said:

Does it include substantially justifiable allegations of having sex with little girls?

 

Just thought I would ask...

. Can you name any politico suspected of paedophilia? Joe Biden, based on the allegations of his daughter? Who are you referring to? You have evidence, right?

9 minutes ago, Miloki said:

 

Seems like an apt analogy for my original point, so I guess so.

 

I'm sure the Tar Baby isn't over everyone's head but you do you.

Whatever you say Sambo!

1 minute ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

Whatever you say Sambo!

 LOL.  Now that was funny!

 

Keep up next time.

20 minutes ago, Miloki said:

 LOL.  Now that was funny!

 

Keep up next time.

You know Sambo?

4 minutes ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

You know Sambo?

 

Not personally but I know how to make butter.

3 hours ago, Yagoda said:

. Can you name any politico suspected of paedophilia? Joe Biden, based on the allegations of his daughter? Who are you referring to? You have evidence, right?

As ever @Yagoda, may I point out that this is a discussion forum, not a court of law. If it were you seem to have appointed yourself as judge, and defence council in this matter!

 

I suggest that Trump is deeply involved in the whole Epstein matter. That is my opinion, based on a large amount of circumstantial evidence: his boasting about his "tastes" on various media, similar boasting of frequenting changing rooms at teenage girls "beauty pageants", photographs of him in the company of Epstein including ones of him (and Epstein) with young girls, and several depositions which have been made ( prior to his entry into politics) about his involvement and partaking, which have been buried by threats and large cash payments, but which nevertheless exist. All circumstantial I agree, but still public. Add to that the extraordinary and quite chaotic lengths his administration is going to in order to prevent the release of what is perhaps more concrete and damming evidence in the files they have admitted and then denied exist, and then bizarrely, if they don't exist, announced that they are deploying huge resources to reacting Trump's name from!

 

So, based upon that I have formed the opinion that the fragrant 47th President of The United States is in this scandal up to his spray tanned neck.  I fully accept that my views on this are heavily influenced by my general opinion that he is an amoral, deceitful, bullying narcissist; but they are my views. You don't have to like or accept them; continue to believe in his innocence, that is entirely your right. I have committed to one opinion, you are irrevocably following another. Hard evidence of his innocence could persuade me to change his mind, although granted not my opinion of his character. I rather doubt any amount of evidence could persuade you to change yours!

 

Now I don't expect that these allegations will ever be properly investigated, let alone come to trial. This would be a scandal on a scale greater than the one that ended Nixon's presidency, infinitely greater than the ones which swirled around Clinton. It would do such damage that it would rock the foundations of the US state, and drag in, quite possibly, many more than Trump himself, from across the political spectrum. Unless a very radical (Democrat) administration comes to power then those files, which would serve to confirm or deny these (my) allegations will remain hidden.

 

An interesting side note, I tried to quote @TedG alongside you preparing this post, but for some reason both his posts aimed at me cannot be quoted.

 

 

 

 

3 hours ago, Miloki said:

Yawn.

 

How's that?

Are you sleepy?

Awwww look Gavin has triggered the fascists lol 😂 it is funny making these guys actually look at the pidpiper they are kowtowing to!pricless!

1 minute ago, Tug said:

Awwww look Gavin has triggered the fascists lol 😂 it is funny making these guys actually look at the pidpiper they are kowtowing to!pricless!

  Newson has Trump and the minions apoplectic with this one. Oh by the way its a joke...

 

 

 

 

I'm surprised, if Gavin Newsom was the unmitigated unelectable disaster so many suggest, then presumably you would be all for him - but strangely you are not!

As a Centrist Dem I can tell you I don't like this guy. I never have, and I don't think he's done California any favors. However I love the fact that he's become Trump's biggest critic, and most of the stuff he says about Trump is true. But since Trump is a tiny minded, highly insecure man he can't handle criticism, and he loses his mind every time somebody says something unflattering about him, though he is certainly ripe for the insults. 

 

 

1 hour ago, JAG said:

As ever @Yagoda, may I point out that this is a discussion forum, not a court of law. If it were you seem to have appointed yourself as judge, and defence council in this matter!

 

I suggest that Trump is deeply involved in the whole Epstein matter. That is my opinion, based on a large amount of circumstantial evidence: his boasting about his "tastes" on various media, similar boasting of frequenting changing rooms at teenage girls "beauty pageants", photographs of him in the company of Epstein including ones of him (and Epstein) with young girls, and several depositions which have been made ( prior to his entry into politics) about his involvement and partaking, which have been buried by threats and large cash payments, but which nevertheless exist. All circumstantial I agree, but still public. Add to that the extraordinary and quite chaotic lengths his administration is going to in order to prevent the release of what is perhaps more concrete and damming evidence in the files they have admitted and then denied exist, and then bizarrely, if they don't exist, announced that they are deploying huge resources to reacting Trump's name from!

 

So, based upon that I have formed the opinion that the fragrant 47th President of The United States is in this scandal up to his spray tanned neck.  I fully accept that my views on this are heavily influenced by my general opinion that he is an amoral, deceitful, bullying narcissist; but they are my views. You don't have to like or accept them; continue to believe in his innocence, that is entirely your right. I have committed to one opinion, you are irrevocably following another. Hard evidence of his innocence could persuade me to change his mind, although granted not my opinion of his character. I rather doubt any amount of evidence could persuade you to change yours!

 

Now I don't expect that these allegations will ever be properly investigated, let alone come to trial. This would be a scandal on a scale greater than the one that ended Nixon's presidency, infinitely greater than the ones which swirled around Clinton. It would do such damage that it would rock the foundations of the US state, and drag in, quite possibly, many more than Trump himself, from across the political spectrum. Unless a very radical (Democrat) administration comes to power then those files, which would serve to confirm or deny these (my) allegations will remain hidden.

 

An interesting side note, I tried to quote @TedG alongside you preparing this post, but for some reason both his posts aimed at me cannot be quoted.

 

 

 

 

That's actually not an insane, batsh*t crazy take and you are open to the possibility of being wrong.  Have not read any other posts of yours on the subject, nor know how many you have made. That may change my mind.

 

I think you are probably wrong.  I think your standards are possibly too high and not applied equally to the alternatives.  I voted for the antiwar candidate which I believe is Trump.  I have been disappointed before by every other President.  He makes me nervous sometimes, no doubt.  But I do think it's really important to him.  No brainer on immigration for me, what Biden did without debate was treasonous.  Trying to bring industry back, possibly getting rid of income taxes.  Dismantling the deep state.  What happened to Trump in his first term was wrong, no matter what you think of the guy.  It was a coup.  Covid was a wakeup call for me, the Federal government is too out of control.

 

Anyway, we'll see.  There is no alternative.  And economically, we're screwed anyway.  Trump has to thread the needle.  Not sure he can, but I'm done with business as usual.  We needed this, hope he's the real deal.  He is certainly one of the most lucky people on the planet for some reason.

 

 

 

 

The Super-Gov with another take-down, Gav for Prez!😁

 

 

18 hours ago, theblether said:

 

 

Yeah, about that.....😆

 

 

 

Troll post removed.

 

@theblether rule 9. You will not post disruptive or inflammatory messages. You will respect other members and post in a civil manner. Personal attacks, insults or hate speech posted on the  forum or sent by private message are not allowed.

 

10. You will not post troll messages. Trolling is the act of purposefully antagonising  forum members by posting controversial, inflammatory, irrelevant or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking other members into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.

The Super-Gov keeping it real:

 

 

7 hours ago, JAG said:

 

I suggest that Trump is deeply involved in the whole Epstein matter.

I suggest you are a liar but let's settle the issue. write an article setting forth your findings and publish it. Send a copy to Trump and your lawyers

27 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

I suggest you are a liar but let's settle the issue. write an article setting forth your findings and publish it. Send a copy to Trump and your lawyers

I suggest  you have fallen under the influence of some Trump voodoo juju. 

8 hours ago, JAG said:

 This would be a scandal on a scale greater than the one that ended Nixon's presidency...and drag in, quite possibly, many more than Trump himself, from across the political spectrum. 

 

Please pick one version of your cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs Epstein conspiracy theories and just stick with it.  The other day you said it was "inescapable" that people in the Biden camp are involved now you're waffling that its "possibly" more from across the spectrum.

 

 

 

1 hour ago, marin said:

I suggest  you have fallen under the influence of some Trump voodoo juju. 

Why? Why not publish his findings? Publicly, as opposed to the anonymity of a Forum. Could it because it is a lying, meretricious libel that would subject him to liability?

 

How stupid is this: "Yeah Trump is a paedo but the Dems never told anyone".

 

No one beleives that except idiots.

 

How about you?

This is the problem with this brigade of filth. They have no proof but they'll growl like Yeti's forevermore. 

 

Don't give this scum the time of day because as I said - for their fever dream to come true it involves harm to children. That;s how sick they are. 

 

But always tremember - one of their standard bearers, George Stephanopolous, was at Epstein's welcome home party after he was released from prison for a pedophile offence. Explain that.