31 minutes ago, Zaphod Priest said:

 

That is one of the most spectacularly ignorant statements I've read in a long time.  It must take a lot of effort to be that scientifically illiterate.

Ignorant statements eh? Tell me where I'm going wrong if you could Sir?

 

Plenty of lies on the CDC www. Lies, that will be exposed before the end of the year I'm informed.

14 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

I'm unformed.

 

"uninformed".

A couple other addenda on this topic:

 

1. the report posted here (although you wouldn't know it from the OP post) dates back to early 2022, more than three years ago... and AFAIK there's been no widespread ruckus about such issues since then, whatever may have occurred in that singular case  for whatever reason.

 

 

And 2. the authors of the original journal article on the issue said they could not conclude a connection between COVID vaccinations and strokes based on what occurred with this one patient, unlike the anti-vaxer sentiments here or in the OP posted inflammatory anti-vaxer article.

 

What the medical doctors actually wrote in their conclusion was:

 

"Although we cannot infer a causal relationship between the vaccine and ischemic stroke based on this case alone, this association needs to be carefully monitored and caution may be needed in patients who have a stroke soon after the first dose. [emphasis added]

Conclusion

The relationship between the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and ischemic stroke needs to be carefully monitored."

 

https://www.strokejournal.org/article/S1052-3057(21)00638-8/fulltext

 

1 hour ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Nobel Prize winners

Which one of the Nobel winners support your denial of the existence of viruses?

 

Which one supports your belief that Koch's postulates from the 1880's are 100% the current gold standard?

 

Which one supports your misbegotten mRNA vaccine claims?

 

Please don't worry that my life is on hold awaiting your claim and its supporting evidence.

Meanwhile, we did have this report in the past month, and not based on the case of a single elderly woman who already had diagnosed heart problems:

 

Study finds no safety issues with most recent mRNA COVID vaccines

July 30, 2025

 

At a time when federal officials are calling into question the safety and necessity of COVID-19 vaccines, the mRNA COVID vaccine version used this past season showed no elevated risk of any of the 29 serious adverse events that researchers in Denmark assessed.

 

The nationwide cohort study, published this week in JAMA Network Open, included 1,585,883 people (54% female), of whom 1,012,400 (64%) received the updated mRNA COVID vaccines containing the JN.1 lineage. 

...

No increased risk of 29 adverse events

...

They found no statistically significant increases in the rate of hospital contacts for any of 29 adverse events during the 28-day period after patients received an mRNA vaccine.

 

(more)

 

https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/study-finds-no-safety-issues-most-recent-mrna-covid-vaccines

 

 

And further, there's plenty of broad-scale research evidence that COVID the infection (which the Japan patient wasn't tested for at the time) is more of a risk factor for stroke that COVID vaccination, and that COVID vaccination itself does NOT increase one's risk of having a stroke (with this report below coming more than a year after the Japan report in the OP)

Does the COVID-19 Vaccine Increase Your Risk of Stroke?

May 25, 2023

 

"Your risk of stroke after the COVID-19 vaccine doesn’t appear to be higher than the stroke risk in the general population. [emphasis added]  But, there does seem to be an elevated risk of stroke after having COVID-19, especially in the first 3 days after you become ill.

 

What is the risk of stroke after the COVID-19 vaccine?

 

Researchers have continued to study stroke risk after COVID-19 vaccination. So far, many have found that there’s no increase in the prevalence of stroke after getting the COVID-19 vaccine compared with stroke rates in the general population. [emphasis added]

 

For example, a 2023 study looked at stroke risk after vaccination with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in more than 4.1 million people. It didn’t find a higher rate of stroke in the 28 days after vaccination. This was true regardless of: age, sex, the type or combination of mRNA vaccines received."

 

https://www.healthline.com/health/stroke/stroke-after-covid-vaccine#vaccines-and-stroke-risk

 

50 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

And further, there's plenty of broad-scale research evidence that COVID the infection (which the Japan patient wasn't tested for at the time) is more of a risk factor for stroke that COVID vaccination, and that COVID vaccination itself does NOT increase one's risk of having a stroke (with this report below coming more than a year after the Japan report in the OP)

Does the COVID-19 Vaccine Increase Your Risk of Stroke?

May 25, 2023

 

"Your risk of stroke after the COVID-19 vaccine doesn’t appear to be higher than the stroke risk in the general population. [emphasis added]  But, there does seem to be an elevated risk of stroke after having COVID-19, especially in the first 3 days after you become ill.

 

What is the risk of stroke after the COVID-19 vaccine?

 

Researchers have continued to study stroke risk after COVID-19 vaccination. So far, many have found that there’s no increase in the prevalence of stroke after getting the COVID-19 vaccine compared with stroke rates in the general population. [emphasis added]

 

For example, a 2023 study looked at stroke risk after vaccination with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in more than 4.1 million people. It didn’t find a higher rate of stroke in the 28 days after vaccination. This was true regardless of: age, sex, the type or combination of mRNA vaccines received."

 

https://www.healthline.com/health/stroke/stroke-after-covid-vaccine#vaccines-and-stroke-risk

 

 

Phew! I'll tell my acquaintance in France who is left permenently disabled by a (officially acknowledged) shot-induced stroke, she'll be chuffed to know she has the honour of being a broken egg for the Pfizer Omelette of Greater Good. I would have also told my 28-year old neighbour here in Thailand, but she's already dead.

23 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

Each new case like this adds to the mountain of evidence that the public was sold a dangerous product under false pretenses — and manipulated into taking it, even when their own bodies were sending out warning signs.

 

She was 83 and suffering from "arterial fibrillation" for many years.

 

So an extremely fragile woman with a pre-existing heart condition. 

 

Perhaps they should not impose vaccines on this demographic. 

 

 

On 9/1/2025 at 5:09 PM, Stiddle Mump said:

If you want health, especially covid news; read my posts.

 

I only tell the truth. I've got my reputation to protect.

Doesn't the MMR vaccine get rid of Mumps?  555

3 hours ago, KannikaP said:

Doesn't the MMR vaccine get rid of Mumps?  555

Certainly not Sir.

 

We have to go back to Dr Enders 1954 experiments to see that all is not as the white-coats make it out to be. And 'make out' is the right word. So much of what we hear, watch and read is not Settled Science at all; but rather 'hoax science'. Calling it  'fraudulent science', would also be accurate.

 

The evidence to debunk the medical claims on vaccines is out there for all to see.

 

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/8309196-the-age-of-autism

 

https://www.dissolvingillusions.com

 

https://www.vernoncoleman.com/main.htm

 

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/25534664-the-poisoned-needle/

 

And!! A respected virologist explains the 'Gold Standards' in lab experiments; and why they are not followed by the virologists.

 

 

 

Found the relevant data related to this incident.......