Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Court Rejects Petition Against Anutin Over Road Use for Aircraft

Featured Replies

 

image.jpeg

Picture courtesy of Khaosod.

 

The Constitutional Court has unanimously rejected a petition alleging that Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul misused public roads as an airstrip for private business purposes. The decision, announced on 17 September 2025, effectively ends the case brought forward by petitioner Niyom Nopparat. The court ruled the complaint could not be accepted as legal procedures were not followed.

 

The petition was filed under Section 213 of the Constitution, case number 86/2568. Niyom claimed that media reports dated 15 June 2025 suggested Anutin, while previously in office, had sought authorisation to use a public road for aircraft landings and take-offs linked to a private company’s activities. The allegation argued this breached ethical standards and contravened several constitutional provisions, including Sections 160 (4)(5), 213, 219, and 235.

 

Niyom requested that the court terminate Anutin’s membership of the House of Representatives, revoke his ministerial position and disqualify him from standing for future elections. However, the Constitutional Court noted that the petitioner had not first submitted the complaint to the Ombudsman as required by the 2018 Organic Act on Constitutional Court Procedures, Section 46, paragraph one. This failure meant the case did not meet constitutional requirements under Section 213.

 

As a result, the court found the petition inadmissible under Section 233 of the Constitution. Judges reached a unanimous decision to reject the complaint, meaning the allegations will not be considered further. The outcome spares Anutin from immediate political or legal consequences arising from the claims.

 

The decision underscores the procedural safeguards in constitutional cases, emphasising that complaints must first be routed through the Ombudsman before reaching the Constitutional Court. Analysts suggest the ruling may discourage future direct filings of a similar nature.

 

Looking ahead, the matter is considered closed unless new proceedings are initiated through the proper channels. No further legal action has been announced by the petitioner following the ruling.

 

 

Key Takeaways

 

• The Constitutional Court unanimously rejected the petition against Anutin on 17 September 2025.

• The complaint was dismissed because it had not first been submitted to the Ombudsman, as required by law.

• The ruling prevents further consideration of the allegations and leaves Anutin unaffected politically.

 

Related Stories

 

DSI-probes-alleged-illegal-runway-built-over-public-land-at-private-airport

 

DSi-probes-illegal-‘vip-runway’-built-over-public-land-in-Nakhon-Ratchasima

 

image.png  Adapted by Asean Now from Khaosod 2025-09-18

 

 

image.png

 

image.png

 

 

 

That's why everyone wants to be PM..

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.