Louis Pasteur’s germ theory describes disease as caused by external factors, whilst Antoine Béchamp’s pleomorphic theory considers the internal environment as the most important contributing factor, stating that microorganisms have various life cycles and stages of development which can range between viruses, bacteria, yeast and fungi, depending on the type of microorganism and the environment it finds itself in.

 

Béchamp did not deny that the air carried germs, but he maintained that they were not primarily responsible, and certainly not required, for disease to develop. He posited that they are only present because of a compromised terrain. 
A good analogy was made by Rudolf Virchow: “Mosquitoes seek the stagnant water, but do not cause the pool to become stagnant.”

 

There is an interesting apocryphal story that Pasteur renounced his germ theory on his death bed, caiming that “Bernard is right. The microbe is nothing. The environment is everything.”
The renowned 20th century French-American microbiologist René Dubos (1901-1982) agreed with Bernard's principle: “Most microbial diseases are caused by organisms present in the body of a normal individual. They become the cause of disease when a disturbance arises which upsets the equilibrium of the body.”

Attached below 2 links to related threads from this sub-forum addressing the subject:

 

https://aseannow.com/topic/1376991-genes-germs-and-the-myth-of-the-invisible-enemy/#comment-20176631

 

https://aseannow.com/topic/1375143-vaccines-mythology-ideology-and-reality-2025/#comment-20135117

 

Quite often during discussions the 'terrain theory' is implicitly referred to.  But the subject deserves a more in-depth treatment, especially for those members not familiar with the concept behind the Terrain theory - vs the 'accepted' Germ theory.  

So I will shortly issue some articles addressing the subject.

5 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

 

Louis Pasteur’s germ theory describes disease as caused by external factors, whilst Antoine Béchamp’s pleomorphic theory considers the internal environment as the most important contributing factor, stating that microorganisms have various life cycles and stages of development which can range between viruses, bacteria, yeast and fungi, depending on the type of microorganism and the environment it finds itself in.

 

Béchamp did not deny that the air carried germs, but he maintained that they were not primarily responsible, and certainly not required, for disease to develop. He posited that they are only present because of a compromised terrain. 
A good analogy was made by Rudolf Virchow: “Mosquitoes seek the stagnant water, but do not cause the pool to become stagnant.”

 

There is an interesting apocryphal story that Pasteur renounced his germ theory on his death bed, caiming that “Bernard is right. The microbe is nothing. The environment is everything.”
The renowned 20th century French-American microbiologist René Dubos (1901-1982) agreed with Bernard's principle: “Most microbial diseases are caused by organisms present in the body of a normal individual. They become the cause of disease when a disturbance arises which upsets the equilibrium of the body.”

I agree that if - for example - there had been no Covid-19 viri in the air (or on surfaces or breathed out by infected persons etc), then no-one else would get infected with Covid.  But unfortunately it's completely unrealistic to remove ALL the pathogens... So vaccinations are required to help the body's immune system defend the body against these pathogens.

 

It would be a wonderful world if there were absolutely no pathogens.... (although no doubt overpopulation would occur....)

1 hour ago, simon43 said:

I agree that if - for example - there had been no Covid-19 viri in the air (or on surfaces or breathed out by infected persons etc), then no-one else would get infected with Covid.  But unfortunately it's completely unrealistic to remove ALL the pathogens... So vaccinations are required to help the body's immune system defend the body against these pathogens.

Monumental humbug Sir.

 

Why do you not do a little research before posting nonsense like this?

 

No one was infected with covid. It was all made up. The virus that supposedly caused the illness has never been found or seen. And it's not likely to be either, cause it don't exist.

3 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Monumental humbug Sir.

 

Why do you not do a little research before posting nonsense like this?

 

No one was infected with covid. It was all made up. The virus that supposedly caused the illness has never been found or seen. And it's not likely to be either, cause it don't exist.

Hi Sticky Dump, thanks for your comments.  But remember your weekend release from the nuthouse will be over later today.  Better watch out 'cos the loony asylum minders will be coming for you with their strait jackets 🙂

1 hour ago, simon43 said:

Hi Sticky Dump, thanks for your comments.  But remember your weekend release from the nuthouse will be over later today.  Better watch out 'cos the loony asylum minders will be coming for you with their strait jackets 🙂

Thanks for your reply Sir.

 

What are vaccines actually for? According to the OP the 'Germ Theory' is not engraved in truth. It is just that; a theory. A theory that has devastated lives, killed millions and made people very rich. Held together by the $$$$.

13 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

 

Louis Pasteur’s germ theory describes disease as caused by external factors, whilst Antoine Béchamp’s pleomorphic theory considers the internal environment as the most important contributing factor, stating that microorganisms have various life cycles and stages of development which can range between viruses, bacteria, yeast and fungi, depending on the type of microorganism and the environment it finds itself in.

 

Béchamp did not deny that the air carried germs, but he maintained that they were not primarily responsible, and certainly not required, for disease to develop. He posited that they are only present because of a compromised terrain. 
A good analogy was made by Rudolf Virchow: “Mosquitoes seek the stagnant water, but do not cause the pool to become stagnant.”

 

There is an interesting apocryphal story that Pasteur renounced his germ theory on his death bed, caiming that “Bernard is right. The microbe is nothing. The environment is everything.”
The renowned 20th century French-American microbiologist René Dubos (1901-1982) agreed with Bernard's principle: “Most microbial diseases are caused by organisms present in the body of a normal individual. They become the cause of disease when a disturbance arises which upsets the equilibrium of the body.”

Are you studying the history of discredited scientific theories?

Probably interesting to some.

8 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

Attached below 2 links to related threads from this sub-forum addressing the subject:

 

https://aseannow.com/topic/1376991-genes-germs-and-the-myth-of-the-invisible-enemy/#comment-20176631

 

https://aseannow.com/topic/1375143-vaccines-mythology-ideology-and-reality-2025/#comment-20135117

 

Quite often during discussions the 'terrain theory' is implicitly referred to.  But the subject deserves a more in-depth treatment, especially for those members not familiar with the concept behind the Terrain theory - vs the 'accepted' Germ theory.  

So I will shortly issue some articles addressing the subject.

Awaiting with bated breath your intellectualness.

21 minutes ago, cdemundo said:

Are you studying the history of discredited scientific theories?

 

Yes. 'Discredited' is the currect term indeed, 'disproven' would have been inaccurate.

1 hour ago, rattlesnake said:

 

Yes. 'Discredited' is the correct term indeed, 'disproven' would have been inaccurate.

Regarding the Germ Theory. 'Made up' would be accurate.

 

And held in place by  $$$$$.

It would be interesting to hear more about Antoine Bechamp's pleomorphic theory and terrain theory.  

 

I read a bit about it but have never heard of this theory before.   So the internal environment of the human body is the ultimate determinant of health?  What kind of variables affect this?

 

Could you recommend further reading information or youtube type lectures?

On 11/2/2025 at 1:22 PM, Stiddle Mump said:

Thanks for your reply Sir.

 

What are vaccines actually for? According to the OP the 'Germ Theory' is not engraved in truth. It is just that; a theory. A theory that has devastated lives, killed millions and made people very rich. Held together by the $$$$.

 

And there it is..............."it's only a theory."

 

Jump off the roof of your condo, and keep telling yourself

"Gravity is only a theory.........gravity is only a theory....

...gra

On 11/1/2025 at 2:41 PM, rattlesnake said:

 

Louis Pasteur’s germ theory describes disease as caused by external factors, whilst Antoine Béchamp’s pleomorphic theory considers the internal environment as the most important contributing factor, stating that microorganisms have various life cycles and stages of development which can range between viruses, bacteria, yeast and fungi, depending on the type of microorganism and the environment it finds itself in.

 

Béchamp did not deny that the air carried germs, but he maintained that they were not primarily responsible, and certainly not required, for disease to develop. He posited that they are only present because of a compromised terrain. 
A good analogy was made by Rudolf Virchow: “Mosquitoes seek the stagnant water, but do not cause the pool to become stagnant.”

 

There is an interesting apocryphal story that Pasteur renounced his germ theory on his death bed, caiming that “Bernard is right. The microbe is nothing. The environment is everything.”
The renowned 20th century French-American microbiologist René Dubos (1901-1982) agreed with Bernard's principle: “Most microbial diseases are caused by organisms present in the body of a normal individual. They become the cause of disease when a disturbance arises which upsets the equilibrium of the body.”

 

Don't forget "The Matrix" theory. 

ie that human beings ARE a virus.

You are never going to get a perfect environment as long as billions of people are polluting the environment on a daily basis. 

 

Maybe 10,000 years ago vaccines were not needed? 

 

Because people mostly hunted and didn't eat processed foods and didn't live in polluted cities and eat polluted fish? 

 

10,000 years ago maybe people didn't work in enclosed office spaces 8 hours a day with windows closed and air isn't circulating .... etc 

 

So a "compromised terrain" is unavoidable. 

 

 

3 hours ago, Mark Nothing said:

It would be interesting to hear more about Antoine Bechamp's pleomorphic theory and terrain theory.  

 

I read a bit about it but have never heard of this theory before.   So the internal environment of the human body is the ultimate determinant of health?  What kind of variables affect this?

 

Could you recommend further reading information or youtube type lectures?

 

I found this article to be very interesting.

 

The Germ Theory House of Cards

 

“There is no doctrine so false that it does not contain some particle of truth.  It is thus with microbian doctrines.” What Béchamp was referring to is that germ theory is dangerous precisely because it contains elements of truth within it. However, it is a bending of truth mixed with falsehoods. While germs and microbes do exist, they are not the outside pathogenic invaders as envisioned by Louis Pasteur. As demonstrated by Antoine Béchamp's research, these entities are found within us at all times, and they can either be a reflection of health or disease depending upon the internal terrain of the individual. When healthy, microbes live harmoniously within us, resulting in normal fermentation processes. However, if the conditions change due to imbalances from unhealthy living, these entities will evolve into other forms (bacteria, yeast, fungi, mold) as required by the body at the time to restore balance. This is known as pleomorphism, which is a central tenet of the terrain theory of disease that is in stark contrast to the germ theory of diseases’ monomorphic view.

 

https://viroliegynewsletter.substack.com/p/the-germ-theory-house-of-cards

3 hours ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

And there it is..............."it's only a theory."

 

Jump off the roof of your condo, and keep telling yourself

"Gravity is only a theory.........gravity is only a theory....

...gra

 

Fallacious reasoning, the certainty of the outcome does not affect the uncertainty of the mechanism. People used to think boa constrictors suffocate their prey to death, yet it was later discovered that they actually block their blood circulation. But the certain death of the prey was never questioned.

14 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

 

I found this article to be very interesting.

 

The Germ Theory House of Cards

 

“There is no doctrine so false that it does not contain some particle of truth.  It is thus with microbian doctrines.” What Béchamp was referring to is that germ theory is dangerous precisely because it contains elements of truth within it. However, it is a bending of truth mixed with falsehoods. While germs and microbes do exist, they are not the outside pathogenic invaders as envisioned by Louis Pasteur. As demonstrated by Antoine Béchamp's research, these entities are found within us at all times, and they can either be a reflection of health or disease depending upon the internal terrain of the individual. When healthy, microbes live harmoniously within us, resulting in normal fermentation processes. However, if the conditions change due to imbalances from unhealthy living, these entities will evolve into other forms (bacteria, yeast, fungi, mold) as required by the body at the time to restore balance. This is known as pleomorphism, which is a central tenet of the terrain theory of disease that is in stark contrast to the germ theory of diseases’ monomorphic view.

 

https://viroliegynewsletter.substack.com/p/the-germ-theory-house-of-cards

What a pleasure to read a science article with actual professionals who actually provide untarnished data.

 

These scientists are immune from the brainwashing and consensus of our current day scientists.

 

What is your take on Antoine Bechamp's microzyma? 

 

He proposed that these tiny living organisms, that are contained in the blood, are the fundamental building blocks of all life.  And that they can change due to a compromised internal environment leading to disease.

2 hours ago, Mark Nothing said:

What a pleasure to read a science article with actual professionals who actually provide untarnished data.

 

These scientists are immune from the brainwashing and consensus of our current day scientists.

 

What is your take on Antoine Bechamp's microzyma? 

 

He proposed that these tiny living organisms, that are contained in the blood, are the fundamental building blocks of all life.  And that they can change due to a compromised internal environment leading to disease.

I think Bechamp was 150 years ahead of his time.

 

My take; our bodies don't do things for nothing. Not only that; the things they do is always for the good health of the body. If not the good health; then to limit any negativity, and to get back to optimal health as the norm.

 

Enzyme activity is essential for life. Some have exotic names, but essentially they are the link between chemicals and energy. They are a catalyst within, that allow everything to function as it should. However, it is now thought that they react favorably to bio-electricity. That is inhaled/inspired and also taken into our bodies is other ways. Sun, earth, and rain.

 

Nature is everything, Without it we are nothing.

19 hours ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

And there it is..............."it's only a theory."

 

Jump off the roof of your condo, and keep telling yourself

"Gravity is only a theory.........gravity is only a theory....

...gra

So you deny the existence of pathogens. Those being identified microbiological organisms which cause symptomatic illness with specific manifestations 

You deny the existence of "immune" systems despite generic progressions in response to most identified "infections" regardless of prior physical fitness status such as the black plague which killed millions regardless of social status and presented with equally generic physical manifestations giving rise to the  name.

Measles, chicken pox, mumps, tetanus, leprosy ........all presenting in identical physical manifestation despite prior  variable health status.

In pre medieval and medieval times when "bad  air" , witches  or  evil spirits dominated explanation for disease and infection it can be acknowledged that ignorance was bliss.

Do you have Bliss ? 

 

9 minutes ago, 0ffshore360 said:

So you deny the existence of pathogens. Those being identified microbiological organisms which cause symptomatic illness with specific manifestations 

You deny the existence of "immune" systems despite generic progressions in response to most identified "infections" regardless of prior physical fitness status such as the black plague which killed millions regardless of social status and presented with equally generic physical manifestations giving rise to the  name.

Measles, chicken pox, mumps, tetanus, leprosy ........all presenting in identical physical manifestation despite prior  variable health status.

In pre medieval and medieval times when "bad  air" , witches  or  evil spirits dominated explanation for disease and infection it can be acknowledged that ignorance was bliss.

Do you have Bliss ? 

 

 

Dude!  Germs are only a theory.

 

A chiropractor said so.

8 hours ago, Mark Nothing said:

What a pleasure to read a science article with actual professionals who actually provide untarnished data.

 

These scientists are immune from the brainwashing and consensus of our current day scientists.

 

What is your take on Antoine Bechamp's microzyma? 

 

He proposed that these tiny living organisms, that are contained in the blood, are the fundamental building blocks of all life.  And that they can change due to a compromised internal environment leading to disease.

 

I think it is not only extremely interesting, but it was validated by a lot of competent scientists. It was ignored in favour of Pasteur's germ theory for motives which were not driven by objective science (and there is a strong parallel to be drawn with Copernicus and the heliocentric model here).

 

I am pasting a paragraph of the article about microzima, for the convenience of the readers of this thread:

 

According to an excellent article by Merinda Teller, MPH, PhD for the Weston A. Price Foundation, much of Béchamp’s work centered on the biological role of fermentation. Bechamp brought about awareness to the tiny elements within the blood that he could view under the microscope in all living things. He decided to call these elements “microzymas,” which he had derived from zyme, the ancient Greek word for a ferment. Bechamp spoke of the microzymas as the “primary anatomical elements of all living beings” as well as “the beginning and end of all organization.” He viewed these particles as living entities precisely due to their “power of movement and production of fermentation.” Because of his studies into the microzyma, Bechamp realized that disease did not come from germs in the air invading from the outside. Disease was produced within the body due to an unfavorable internal environment brought about by poor nutrition, drugs, alcohol use, toxins, and various other factors. In other words, Bechamp viewed disease as multifactorial and saw the microbes as a response by microzymas coming from within that were brought about by the changes in the internal environment. Pasteur, on the other hand, viewed these entities as coming from outside of the body which fueled his belief that there were specific invading microbes associated with specific diseases.

The bitter competition between Louis Pasteur's germ theory and Antoine Bechamp's Pleomorphic theory is fascinating. Bechamp even accused Pasteur of plagiarising his work.

 

I would like to add a powerful element, from my experience, that confirms Bechamp's theory of creating a positive internal environment which lead to health, free of disease.  Your inner world of mental toughness, including spiritual concepts such as thoughts, emotions, goals has a profound positive affect on the internal environment and Bechamp explains brilliantly why.  I would say the lion's share compared to the other physical world items mentioned.

 

Interestingly enough in 1876 Bechamp was appointed Dean of the Catholic School of Medicine at the University of Lille Nord Du France. In my opinion Bechamp is trying to scientifically proove why the Holy Bible is such a masterful tool with his pleomorphic theory.  Even more unusual the Catholic church and Pasteur collaberated to have Bechamp's written works placed on the index of prohibited books, index Librorum Prohibitorum.

11 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

 

I think it is not only extremely interesting, but it was validated by a lot of competent scientists. It was ignored in favour of Pasteur's germ theory for motives which were not driven by objective science (and there is a strong parallel to be drawn with Copernicus and the heliocentric model here).

 

I am pasting a paragraph of the article about microzima, for the convenience of the readers of this thread:

 

According to an excellent article by Merinda Teller, MPH, PhD for the Weston A. Price Foundation, much of Béchamp’s work centered on the biological role of fermentation. Bechamp brought about awareness to the tiny elements within the blood that he could view under the microscope in all living things. He decided to call these elements “microzymas,” which he had derived from zyme, the ancient Greek word for a ferment. Bechamp spoke of the microzymas as the “primary anatomical elements of all living beings” as well as “the beginning and end of all organization.” He viewed these particles as living entities precisely due to their “power of movement and production of fermentation.” Because of his studies into the microzyma, Bechamp realized that disease did not come from germs in the air invading from the outside. Disease was produced within the body due to an unfavorable internal environment brought about by poor nutrition, drugs, alcohol use, toxins, and various other factors. In other words, Bechamp viewed disease as multifactorial and saw the microbes as a response by microzymas coming from within that were brought about by the changes in the internal environment. Pasteur, on the other hand, viewed these entities as coming from outside of the body which fueled his belief that there were specific invading microbes associated with specific diseases.

Excellent analysis. The microzyma, contained in the blood, and fermenting is especially interesting.  The life force of human beings is contained in the blood. 

 

The scientists say blood has 4 components.  55% consists of plasma ultrafiltrate (called living water in the Holy Bible or urine to laymen). Funny how different players give it different names and purposes.  Kind of like they are adding an element of confusion on purpose.  Our "experts" label it a dirty, useless waste product.  The Holy Bible labels it God's gift to humanity. One party has to be exactly wrong. 44% red blood cells. And 1% white blood cells and platelets.

 

So I tested the hypothesis.  Ingesting varying fermentations from minutes of aging to mutiple years, of living water and applying topically to cuts or bites. 7 years now. Living water goes through a distinct fermentation process just as Antoine Bechamp reports. It turns black like cocacola, gets extremely strong tasting like fire water, then after about a year it mellows to complete smoothness. It is living.  Even outside the human body in a container or vessel.  More confirmation where truth is located and who is dispensing falsity. 

 

Results have been wildly successful.  Total and complete elimination of all ailments.  And the awakening of a spiritual awareness that appeared out of nowhere leading to intense study of the unseen realm and full implementation of the concepts and beliefs.

 

Likewise, from my experience germ theory is false and has done incredible damage to humanity.  The trap is real.  Exiting the ensnarement requires sacrificing the demon cult's  poisonous belief system and updating to truth.  Bechamp is a genius.

 

 

4 minutes ago, Mark Nothing said:

Excellent analysis. The microzyma, contained in the blood, and fermenting is especially interesting.  The life force of human beings is contained in the blood. 

 

The scientists say blood has 4 components.  55% consists of plasma ultrafiltrate (called living water in the Holy Bible or urine to laymen). Funny how different players give it different names and purposes.  Kind of like they are adding an element of confusion on purpose.  Our "experts" label it a dirty, useless waste product.  The Holy Bible labels it God's gift to humanity. One party has to be exactly wrong. 44% red blood cells. And 1% white blood cells and platelets.

 

So I tested the hypothesis.  Ingesting varying fermentations from minutes of aging to mutiple years, of living water and applying topically to cuts or bites. 7 years now. Living water goes through a distinct fermentation process just as Antoine Bechamp reports. It turns black like cocacola, gets extremely strong tasting like fire water, then after about a year it mellows to complete smoothness. It is living.  Even outside the human body in a container or vessel.  More confirmation where truth is located and who is dispensing falsity. 

 

Results have been wildly successful.  Total and complete elimination of all ailments.  And the awakening of a spiritual awareness that appeared out of nowhere leading to intense study of the unseen realm and full implementation of the concepts and beliefs.

 

Likewise, from my experience germ theory is false and has done incredible damage to humanity.  The trap is real.  Exiting the ensnarement requires sacrificing the demon cult's  poisonous belief system and updating to truth.  Bechamp is a genius.

 

 

 

Very interesting.

The 2019 article, "Germ Theory vs Terrain, the Wrong Side Won the day", written by Merinda Teller, PhD, had some real gold nugget quotes.  Thank you for the article.

 

"The sooner we get over Pasteur's fake science of germ theory the better."

 

"The scientific bias in favor of Pateur's germ theory has not served the interests of citizen's health."

 

"The main benefit of Pasteur's germ theory was in the fact that it was both superficially plausable and financially exploitable."

 

"Most of the early companies benefitting from germ theory were chemical companies designing synthetic products to kill and immobilize parasites."

 

"Pasteur's greatest claim to fame is the calamitous prostitution of science and medicine to commercial interests."

 

"Our scientific experts are unwilling to step out of the lucrative mindset of germ theory."

 

"There is no sane reason to include dna of other animal species into vaccines.  The microzymas of animals provide no benefit to human beings.  This weakens the immune system and weakens the human body to be more prone to the underlying disease"

 

"The false model of health espoused by Pasteur and his false germ theory is pushing us all into disability and death."

 

"We can not allow our scientific reasearchers to receive direct or indirect funding from pharmaceutical companies."

1 hour ago, Mark Nothing said:

The 2019 article, "Germ Theory vs Terrain, the Wrong Side Won the day", written by Merinda Teller, PhD, had some real gold nugget quotes.  Thank you for the article.

 

"The sooner we get over Pasteur's fake science of germ theory the better."

 

"The scientific bias in favor of Pateur's germ theory has not served the interests of citizen's health."

 

"The main benefit of Pasteur's germ theory was in the fact that it was both superficially plausable and financially exploitable."

 

"Most of the early companies benefitting from germ theory were chemical companies designing synthetic products to kill and immobilize parasites."

 

"Pasteur's greatest claim to fame is the calamitous prostitution of science and medicine to commercial interests."

 

"Our scientific experts are unwilling to step out of the lucrative mindset of germ theory."

 

"There is no sane reason to include dna of other animal species into vaccines.  The microzymas of animals provide no benefit to human beings.  This weakens the immune system and weakens the human body to be more prone to the underlying disease"

 

"The false model of health espoused by Pasteur and his false germ theory is pushing us all into disability and death."

 

"We can not allow our scientific reasearchers to receive direct or indirect funding from pharmaceutical companies."

 

Indeed. Yet the germ believers will not even consider it. The core issue is belief and everything that goes with it.

In the house of cards article there was a quote by Dr Simon Louis Katzoff, from his 1921 book titled, Timely Truth on Human Health that was very insightful.

 

"Germs do not cause any disease, but there was more harm in the fear of germs."

 

The poisonous beliefs embedded in the brain act like a radioactive poison emanating throughout the body changing the microzymas from harmonious health to poisoned disease.  The person unaware of this process actually instigates and manufactures the ailment.  

 

 

9 minutes ago, Mark Nothing said:

"Germs do not cause any disease, but there was more harm in the fear of germs."

 

We saw a good example of that during Covid, with all these people wearing mask with their disastrous consequences on health.

A spiritual poisoning is incredibly powerful as we learned.  It has been a real eye opener seeing how powerful the forces are in the unseen realm.

 

Interestingly enough those pulling it off, the counterfeit experts, have just reverse engineered Holy Bible principles.

 

The more I ponder it the more I think vaccines are saline solution.  And the implantation of disease occurs via spiritual poison by our "experts" embedding poisonous beliefs strong enough that people psyche themselves out and create the very circumstance they fear.

2 hours ago, Mark Nothing said:

A spiritual poisoning is incredibly powerful as we learned.  It has been a real eye opener seeing how powerful the forces are in the unseen realm.

 

Interestingly enough those pulling it off, the counterfeit experts, have just reverse engineered Holy Bible principles.

 

The more I ponder it the more I think vaccines are saline solution.  And the implantation of disease occurs via spiritual poison by our "experts" embedding poisonous beliefs strong enough that people psyche themselves out and create the very circumstance they fear.

 

I think it's probably a combination of both. But there definitely is a spiritual poisoning which leads people to not only harm themselves, but also wish harm on – and dismiss and mock harm already incurred by – other people. It's plainly obvious in the vaccine threads, where a post about serious vaccine injury will be met with laughing emojis. The people posting these emojis are clearly possessed by a nefarious energy.

On 11/1/2025 at 7:41 PM, rattlesnake said:

 

Louis Pasteur’s germ theory describes disease as caused by external factors, whilst Antoine Béchamp’s pleomorphic theory considers the internal environment as the most important contributing factor, stating that microorganisms have various life cycles and stages of development which can range between viruses, bacteria, yeast and fungi, depending on the type of microorganism and the environment it finds itself in.

 

Béchamp did not deny that the air carried germs, but he maintained that they were not primarily responsible, and certainly not required, for disease to develop. He posited that they are only present because of a compromised terrain. 
A good analogy was made by Rudolf Virchow: “Mosquitoes seek the stagnant water, but do not cause the pool to become stagnant.”

 

There is an interesting apocryphal story that Pasteur renounced his germ theory on his death bed, caiming that “Bernard is right. The microbe is nothing. The environment is everything.”
The renowned 20th century French-American microbiologist René Dubos (1901-1982) agreed with Bernard's principle: “Most microbial diseases are caused by organisms present in the body of a normal individual. They become the cause of disease when a disturbance arises which upsets the equilibrium of the body.”

 

Where fear warns, science clarifies—and trust lights the way.