This is a highly technical document which I am not equipped to assess.
It does not claim to make a statement of fact, but instead produces suggestive evidence that the so-called "spike-protein" used in the "vaccines" and alleged to come from a "virus" may have been a particle produced by the body itself.
I.e. this is a hypothesis.  But one of extreme importance since it questions the so-called "science" upon which the global Pandemic, and the response thereto, was based.

 

https://open.substack.com/pub/jonfleetwood/p/was-the-wuhan-covid-spike-really

 

If, as for myself, the technical stuff is mere jargon, I suggest skimming through to the document's conclusion.

When the Pandemic was in full swing, amongst the ostracised and censored medical professionals who contested the official narrative, there were some who questioned the very existence of the Wuhan virus.

They pointed out:
(1) the virus had never been isolated [viruses can be obtained in a seemingly inert crystalline form, only 'coming alive' within a living cell];  and
(2) electron-microscope images of the supposed virus were indistinguishable from those of a human exosome.

If a disease spreads, and scientists claim to have identified a virus that is responsible for that, and subsequently develop vaccines that reduce the spread, then I am going to go with the idea that there was a virus.

 

Our company tracked COVID-19 pretty closely, and it was clear from our data that the best defence against COVID-19 was previous infection, the more recent the better, and the second-best defence was vaccination.  I think we did a great job in fighting the dual enemies of COVID-19 infection and panic. We set up our own labs, we controlled activities on site and off-site, and minimised the project impact.  I don't think I have ever seen a company that "Got it done" like that.

As Dilbert's boss said:
"This report is ignorant, ill-conceived nonsense"
"Have you read it?"
"Why would I read rubbish like that?"

So I followed the link that the OP provided.

 

I think that their error is summarised in their final paragraph
"The pandemic began with one lung sample, one algorithm, and one assumption—that RNA in sick tissue must belong to a new pathogen."
My understanding, from being there at the time, was that the pandemic began with an international wave of illness resulting in fatalities whcih spread around the world.  I was there. Grok was not.

 

SC