On 12/4/2025 at 11:07 AM, Red Phoenix said:

Why is Every Newborn Forced to Get A Hepatitis B Vaccine?

Today at the 4-5 December ACIP meeting, we have a once in a lifetime chance to end this disastrous policy

Source: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every-newborn-forced-to-get-369

= = = 

Story at a Glance:

• The hepatitis B vaccine has been marred by controversy since its inception, particularly since it is now given to every newborn child despite less than one in a million children benefitting from this policy.

• Remarkably, much of that controversy (e.g., Congressional hearings, mainstream news programs, and HIV vaccine contamination concerns) has been largely forgotten.

• The hepatitis B vaccine has long been associated with autoimmune disorders, particularly demyelinating ones. While the medical community has insisted for over 50 years that this link remains unproven and requires “further research”, evidence demonstrates this process indeed occurs.

• While the hepatitis B vaccine has reduced acute cases in high-risk demographics (e.g., intravenous drug users), there is no evidence it has done the same in newborns (as applicable circumstances are incredibly rare) or reduced chronic hepatitis cases.

• TODAY, on Thursday 4 December, the blanket policy to give it to every newborn will at last be re-evaluated.

 

> The article is an abridged version of a longer article which details the atrocious history of the hepatitis B vaccine (and can be read here > https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every-newborn-forced-to-get).

Additionally a companion article on the pros and cons of each individual childhood vaccines can be read here > https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/determining-the-risks-and-benefits.

Finally, an article providing the extensive evidence vaccines cause a wide range of subtle and severe complications (e.g., making many chronic illnesses 3-10X more likely) can be read here > https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-much-damage-has-mass-vaccination

I would like to say that I strongly support you and Middle Stump not vaccinating your offspring. Better still not to have any offspring at all, you can help make the human gene pool stronger.

 

1 minute ago, rattlesnake said:

 

What do you think of it?

 

1 minute ago, rattlesnake said:

 

What do you think of it?

I think the Midwestern Doctor is a fraud. His approach is to make some alarmist claim (i.e. blood pressue medicines do more harm than good, sunlight doesn't cause skin cancer, statins are a scam) and then promise you how to cure your health ills naturally -- but only once you subscribe. He's also a big advocate of the Covid spike protein shedding myth, although he admits it should be medically impossible.

 

As for the HBV vaccine, if the US had an adequate health system, universal prescreening, and comprehensive prenatal care, there could be targetted use of the vaccine at birth. But it doesn't have any of those things.  That's the reason the CDC finally began recommending universal vaccination.

44 minutes ago, jaywalker2 said:

if the US had an adequate health system, universal prescreening, and comprehensive prenatal care, there could be targetted use of the vaccine at birth. But it doesn't have any of those things.

People have to take charge of their own health and that of their loved ones. Parents have to step up to the plate regarding their children's health welfare. Cannot even begin to trust white-coats who put $$$ before their charges.

 

A good health system informs and guides. Not forces and mandates.

 

Nature has the answers we seek. Not white-coats supping from the Big Pharma $$$ river. 

 

 

53 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

I would like to say that I strongly support you and Middle Stump not vaccinating your offspring. Better still not to have any offspring at all, you can help make the human gene pool stronger.

 

Translation: "May you and your children die". Such a nice, reasonable thing to say to a fellow human whose sole crime is to refuse a medical intervention. No surprise at all that this comes from a vocal critic of Trump "the fascist":

 

 

There is seemingly no limit to the absurdity of the modern man. Homo Absurdus.

1 hour ago, jaywalker2 said:

I think the Midwestern Doctor is a fraud. His approach is to make some alarmist claim (i.e. blood pressue medicines do more harm than good, sunlight doesn't cause skin cancer, statins are a scam) and then promise you how to cure your health ills naturally -- but only once you subscribe.

 

I am always mildly amused to see that making money only becomes a problem when people who refute The Dogma are concerned.

 

I presume you have no problem with using Pfizer products and trusting their claims on them?

 

As a friendly reminder, Pfizer makes tens of billions in annual turnover, and has paid $1.3 billion in criminal fines for off-label marketing, misleading claims, concealed safety concerns and kickbacks.

4 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

 

I am always mildly amused to see that making money only becomes a problem when people who refute The Dogma are concerned.

 

I presume you have no problem with using Pfizer products and trusting their claims on them?

 

As a friendly reminder, Pfizer makes tens of billions in annual turnover, and has paid $1.3 billion in criminal fines for off-label marketing, misleading claims, concealed safety concerns and kickbacks.

Another that mocks medical science over businesses making money whilst trying to save lives, which they do.

 

I must assume that you envy those who provide employment and save lives at the same time.

 

It is people like you who would rather live in an era where life was way shorter, but, you never know, you may get your wish as you will never use a medication that may have made money, which is all medication......😉

 

I won't wish you good luck, because it is what you want.........🤗

3 minutes ago, transam said:

Another that mocks medical science over businesses making money whilst trying to save lives, which they do.

 

I must assume that you envy those who provide employment and save lives at the same time.

 

It is people like you who would rather live in an era where life was way shorter, but, you never know, you may get your wish as you will never use a medication that may have made money, which is all medication......😉

 

I won't wish you good luck, because it is what you want.........🤗

 

You need to reread the post of mine you quoted, as well as the post I was quoting myself, in order to understand the context and purpose of what I said. I am pointing out the hypocrisy and paradox encapsulated in the oft-repeated claim that a given doctor is malevolent because they earn a living from their activities.

31 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

 

Translation: "May you and your children die". Such a nice, reasonable thing to say to a fellow human whose sole crime is to refuse a medical intervention. 

I did not say that, I said I support his choice.

And why would he and his children die if vaccines don't serve any purpose and we're fine without them?? You'd tied yourself in a knot it seems.

 

Quote

 

There is seemingly no limit to the absurdity of the modern man. Homo Absurdus.

Yep, he is completely absurd - thanks for reminding me of that post.

This Anti vaccine machinery spreading faster than covid 19, will help the world to get rid of dead weight 👏

 

congratulations, and it is heavily sponsored by foreign forces who do not want the west to survive as it is now. They want us polarized and of the table 

 

 

To bored to write myself, AI helps 

 

 

While the primary drivers of the anti-vaccine movement in the West are domestic individuals and groups, intelligence and public health experts confirm that 

Russia and China have systematically amplified and exploited anti-vaccine sentiment through state-sponsored disinformation campaigns. These efforts are designed to sow distrust in Western institutions and promote their own vaccines and political influence rather than directly sponsoring the entire movement itself. 

 

Russia's Role

• Geopolitical Disruption: Russian state media, troll farms, and proxy outlets have long targeted the issue of vaccines to create social chaos and undermine trust in Western governments and healthcare systems.
• Targeted Campaigns: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Russia ran campaigns specifically to discredit the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, making unfounded links between the jabs and deaths in Europe and promoting their own Sputnik V vaccine as superior.
• Amplification of Domestic Voices: Russian accounts have engaged with both pro- and anti-vaccine groups to maximize polarization, effectively amplifying the messages of existing domestic anti-vaccine campaigners. 

 

China's Role

• Vaccine Diplomacy: China has used its state-controlled media to promote its own Sinovac vaccine while simultaneously spreading misleading narratives about the safety and efficacy of Western-developed vaccines.
• Undermining the West: Similar to Russia, China's disinformation efforts focus on undermining trust in Western institutions and vaccination strategies as a form of "vaccine diplomacy" and a zero-sum game for global influence.
• Reciprocal Disinformation: Reporting in June 2024 revealed that the U.S. military ran its own secret anti-vaccine campaign during the pandemic to discredit China's Sinovac in the Philippines, highlighting a reciprocal information war. 

 

Conclusion

Russia and China did not initiate the anti-vaccine movement, which has deep roots in domestic skepticism and influential individuals. However, they have actively used state resources to pour fuel on the fire, employing sophisticated information warfare tactics to exploit existing fears and amplify anti-Western narratives for their own geopolitical gain. 

 

 

 

1 hour ago, josephbloggs said:

I would like to say that I strongly support you and Middle Stump not vaccinating your offspring. Better still not to have any offspring at all, you can help make the human gene pool stronger.

 

The top pic is a white-coat concocting something to save the world from a virus; as yet undiscovered.

 

The pic below looks like the same lady doing some research.

11 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

 

You need to reread the post of mine you quoted, as well as the post I was quoting myself, in order to understand the context and purpose of what I said. I am pointing out the hypocrisy and paradox encapsulated in the oft-repeated claim that a given doctor is malevolent because they earn a living from their activities.

Good luck, I hope you can survive without any medication, which I doubt.........🥹

2 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

I did not say that, I said I support his choice.

And why would he and his children die if vaccines don't serve any purpose and we're fine without them?? You'd tied yourself in a knot it seems.

 

You were trying to be clever by implying (as several others regularly do on this forum) that antivaxxers should be left to live by their principles because, according to Darwinism, they will thereby seal their fate and die, as will their progeny.

 

This projected demise never materialises, but you state it is a desirable outcome… for the Greater Good of course.

2 minutes ago, transam said:

Good luck, I hope you can survive without any medication, which I doubt.........🥹

 

You have not understood what I said.

4 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

The top pic is a white-coat concocting something to save the world from a virus; as yet undiscovered.

 

The pic below looks like the same lady doing some research.

Oh dear, looks like you may have an eye problem, sadly, that will be bad news for you with no medical help....😒

Just now, rattlesnake said:

 

You have not understood what I said.

I don't understand much of what you say, as I think you are a bit..........................

3 minutes ago, transam said:

I don't understand much of what you say, as I think you are a bit..........................

 

That's okay, transam.

CDC in 1991: Healthcare workers think the Hep B jab is too risky for themselves, so let's give it to all babies instead.

Source: https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/cdc-in-1991-healthcare-workers-think

= = =

H/t to James Lyons-Weiler, PhD who posted the below clipping from the NYT dated March 1st, 1991 on X 

In his post he points out that any claims made that the reason for giving this injection to babies (rather than offering it to adults) were related to efficacy (or any other scientific rationale) are clearly untrue.

The article evidences that the actual reason was that adults - including healthcare workers - were reluctant to receive it due to the potential risks outweighing the benefits1.

The official response to that was: give it to babies instead, and the Hep B vaccine was officially duly added to the schedule the same year.

Recall that pursuant to the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act 1986 (which had been passed a few years earlier), manufacturers of vaccines on the childhood schedule were immune from civil lawsuits for damages related to vaccine injuries or death.

This is the totalitarian biomedical-industrial complex in action.

 

https://x.com/lifebiomedguru/status/1998019167765569638

11 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

 

What you call a "source of knowledge", I call an interesting take which certainly makes a lot of sense.

 

Who was she "disproven" by?

You know very well that her comment on Hepatitis was  a lie and that when confronted with the lie refused to apologize or to acknowledge it. Idiots and malicious individuals have repeated the lie,

 

“If you don't have hepatitis B then your baby's not going to have hepatitis B”; “there's 16 times the amount of aluminum that the FDA says can poison a baby”    Source:The Liz Wheeler Show, Liz Wheeler, 2022-03-23

 

Absolutely wrong.  Although mother to child transmission is a leading route of infection, screening does not always  identify an infected person. More specifically, child-to-child transmission another major route of infection because children's behaviour. They cry, drool, vomit, spit, sneeze and cough.  Contact with these fluids transmits the infection.

 

Adults  are less likely to develop chronic hepatitis when infected as adults. Unfortunately, the data shows that 90% of infants and 30% of children under the age of 6  will develop chronic Hepatitis.  25% of infants infected at birth will die prematurely of hepatotis related causes. 

 

As for the nonsense claim  on aluminum, she apparently pulled the number from her anal orifice. The idiots who repeat this claim ignore the fact that aluminum is a natural element found in food, water, and soil and that everyone ingests aluminum on a daily basis. The CDC  offers  a dose  of reality with the fat that the amount in vaccines is small, often less than 0.5 mg per dose, and infants receive more aluminum from breast milk or formula than from vaccines in their first six months.  It is excreted from the body. The  aluminum binds to the blood protein transferrin, filtered by the kidneys and excreted in urine. 

 

 

 

 

52 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

Unfortunately, the data shows that 90% of infants and 30% of children under the age of 6  will develop chronic Hepatitis.  25% of infants infected at birth will die prematurely of hepatotis related causes. 

 

Please provide your sources for these claims.

1 hour ago, rattlesnake said:

 

Please provide your sources for these claims.

 

Why? It is not as if you have  the intellectual capability or academic training to comprehend the documentation. Nor would you acknowledge the factual evidence.  The members of the cult of ignorance use any platform and means to spread false information and claims. This isn't a debate in a civil society. It is  a battle of good v. evil and the cult of ignorance wishes to return society to the dark ages. Spreading false claims about vaccines offers the marginalized substrata of society, a chance to feel important, and I am not going to play.

1 hour ago, Patong2021 said:

 

Why? It is not as if you have  the intellectual capability or academic training to comprehend the documentation. Nor would you acknowledge the factual evidence.  The members of the cult of ignorance use any platform and means to spread false information and claims. This isn't a debate in a civil society. It is  a battle of good v. evil and the cult of ignorance wishes to return society to the dark ages. Spreading false claims about vaccines offers the marginalized substrata of society, a chance to feel important, and I am not going to play.

 

What you should have written is that according to official data, infants and children who are infected with hepatitis B are more likely to develop chronic disease, including about 90% of infants and 30% of children ages 1 to 5.

 

Decent effort nonetheless, do keep it up.